Monday, May 26, 2008

The Assassination Of Barack Hussein Obama...Can It Be Stopped?

Monday, May 26, 2008

Were Hillary's recent comments concerning Robert Kennedy's assassination wishful thinking? No doubt others are having similar thoughts as his nomination is all but certain and they perceive their interests threatened.
Some of the most catastrophic events in our nations history come as complete surprises to our government. The attack at Pearl Harbor, the assassination of John F. Kennedy and September 11, 2001. In our more recent history the targets of assassins have been charismatic agents of change. John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Bobby Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and Yitzhak Rabin for example. All of these men were perceived threats to the status quo with the exception of Reagan. The objective of his would be assassin was simply to impress movie star Jody Foster. To put this in terms our government can understand, the terror threat against Presidential Candidate Obama is bright red. He is the first serious and charasmatic black presidential contender in our nations history(strike one) and his most fundamental message is that of change(strike two). But most importantly the Zionist status quo is uncertain about him. All security alarms should now be sounding loudly.

Although there may be many who would wish to harm this candidate, let me offer up a criminal profile of his most likely assassin(s) for our law enforcement agencies.


His most likely assassin would be an agent of Israel or a citizen of America with allegiances to this foreign government. The motive, to eliminate a presidential candidate that Israel believes is not completely servile to its interests. For example in a recent article Justin Raimondo offered this:

In the face of this nationwide upsurge of Obama-mania, the War Party is making threatening noises, such as in this piece in the Jerusalem Post reporting Malcolm Hoenlein's visit to Israel, where he announced that Obama's candidacy may represent a threat:

"All the talk about change, but without defining what that change should be is an opening for all kind of mischief. Of course Obama has plenty of Jewish supporters and there are many Jews around him. But there is a legitimate concern over the zeitgeist around the campaign."

What sort of mischief is Hoenlein talking about? Obama's expression of compassion over Palestinian suffering? Is the zeitgeist that he is concerned about a shift in attitudes about the ethics of ethnic cleansing or the morality of the oppression within a Jewish State? What's next holding Israel to some standard of decency? That could be disastrous. Israel will never stand for it.


Those carrying out the assassination or observing those that will carry it out (much like the Mossad spies observing the hijackers before 9/11), will have military intelligence backgrounds and experience spying for Mossad. They will be assisted by Israeli telecommunications companies who are in the pocket of the Israeli government and specifically in the service of Israel's chief spying agency. Rest assured that the assassination will be blamed in some form or fashion on Arab or Muslim terrorists or anti-Semites somewhere, probably Palestinians. The assassination will be timed to coincide with an international crisis also provoked by Israel. This provocation will likely involve an air attack on Iran at which time America will be expected to rally behind its alleged friend and ally, Israel. Thus the media scrutiny of the death of a mere presidential hopeful will not be as great.


Now is the time of Senator Obama's greatest vulnerability. He lacks the significant protection he may someday have as president. His every telephone communication is being monitored by Israel. His headquarters is likely bugged by Israel or their servants. Just like before 9/11 there are now more than enough Mossad spies here to take care of business. His every conversation and movement monitored by Mossad.. Some of his campaign advisors likely report to the same nest of spies at the Israeli embassy that AIPAC spies Rosen and Weissmann reported. Obama is now an easy target. And even if the assassination is bungled, Israel has the assurance that any investigation leading to its door steps will be dropped by the Bush Administration. Killed in precisely the same way as when the plug was pulled on the investigation of the Urban Moving Company spies arrested on September 11, 2001. Those spies had been monitoring the movements of the Hijackers for over a year. And of course in the same way that it's Justice Department will drop the prosecution of AIPAC spies Rosen and Weissman before the trial begins in April. And we all know that our ethnocentric main stream media will not report any news related to these stories or any other critical of Israel.

So to those secret service agents charged with the protection of our presidential candidates and those FBI and CIA agents who were outraged when ordered to drop the investigation of Israel's duplicity in the 9/11 attacks on our nation, be on the lookout. Don't let these murderous bastards get away with another one.

Fox News advocates killing Obama. Shouldn't someone be arrested?

Added: May 25, 2008
While commenting on Hillary's RFK gaffe, Liz Trotta on Fox News Channel first referred to Barack Obama as "Osama" and then laughed that they should both be killed.

***Sign the Petition to Have Liz Trotta Fired***

Marc Parent

Is This AIPAC Member Wearing Clothes?...You Decide

No complaints please this is a Freud and actually on a wall in a museum.

Our treason fest begins June 2, 2008...Meet us in Chicago!

Jews have a Biblical claim to Palestine. Like Irish Catholics have a Biblical claim to Rome.

Jews were a people without a land and Palestine was a land without a people. Disregard all of those Palestinian refugee camps.

There can be no peace until the Palestinians recognize Israel's right to exist. Even though we stole 70 percent of their land in 1948 and have attempted to steal the rest of the West Bank and Gaza since we occupied it after the 1967 war.

AIPAC has no more influence on Congress than other Washington Lobbies "don't worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America."...Ariel Sharon

Israel is a liberal democracy. One of the few in the Middle East. If you ignore the fact that a population equal to the number of Jews in Israel are imprisoned in Gaza and the West Bank which are occupied and controlled by the Israeli Democrats.

The AIPAC member above is fully dressed. You decide.

Why Are These Brooklyn Gangsta's Still Free?

The Rubashkin's, owners of the Postville Iowa Agriprocessors Kosher plant raided on May 13, 2008.

It's been almost two weeks now since a hoard of Feds representing most of our law enforcement agencies descended on a Kosher meat packing plant in Postville Iowa. While most of the Rabushkins illegal employees were herded like cattle off to where ever those poor folks go after such raids, so far as we can tell the Rabushkins are still free range birds.

There seems to be abundant evidence that the father son duo had knowledge of what was going on at the plant. Shlomo the Rabbi son worked at the plant for Christ sake. The paychecks of the illegals were color coded. The plant employed children and otherwise completely ignored our labor laws. The company paid less than minimum wage and often shorted the employees for the hours they actually worked (go ahead and complain and see what happens). And I'm not even going into the meat hook beating and other exploitation of these people. And what about the methamphetamine lab??? Ah, if only a few years ago those PETA undercover cameras were focused on human abuse rather than bovine abuse perhaps this inhumanity to man could have been discovered earlier.

Once again I am asking myself, how cheaply can our politicians be bought? Lets take a look at who these gangstas have made political contributions to in the past. We all know that justice under the Bush administration can be purchased. That is what politicization of the Justice Department is all about. This may give us some idea why these birds are still free range. Here we go.

Sholom Rubashkin, whose family owns the company, since 2000 has made $23,750 in federal campaign contributions, according to Federal Election Commission records.

That includes $5,750 to the Republican Party of Iowa from 2002 through 2004.Rubashkin also gave $2,000 to Rep. Tom Latham, an Ames Republican, in 2004; $1,500 to candidate William Dix in 2006; $3,000 to candidate Stan Thompson from 2001 through 2004; $2,000 to Sen. Charles Grassley of New Hartford in 2004; and $2,500 to former Rep. Jim Nussle in 2000 and 2002.Grassley collected another $2,000 each from Abraham Rubashkin, Leah Rubashkin and Ryfka Rubashkin, all of Postville, in August 2004.

Exemption from our laws for a piddly twenty four grand, I'll take some of that action. Where should I send my check?

No comments:

Post a Comment