Saturday, August 30, 2008

The Collapse of WTC 7 - Christopher Bollyn

Christopher Bollyn

August 30, 2008

After nearly seven years, the U.S. government is finally coming out with its tortuous explanation as to how the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed seven hours after the twin towers collapsed on 9-11.


View collapse of Silverstein's tower at:
http://www.libertyforlife.com/images/911/wtc7an.gif

It will be interesting to hear how Shyam Sunder from New Delhi and other foreign-born scientists of NIST explain how the steel-framed skyscraper owned and built by Larry Silverstein (and other Israelis) fell into its own footprint as the result of a few minor fires, while other high-rise towers, such as the Windsor building in Madrid, burned intensely for more than 24 hours like a torch - and remained standing.


Shyam Sunder and his pile of lies about WTC 7

The NIST study promises to include computer simulations in which the critical parameters are tweaked until the desired result occurs, in this case until the tower collapses. In the similar Vinnova "study" (i.e. manipulation), the Swedish state funded a computer simulation of the Estonia ferry catastrophe of 1994 in which scientists were chosen only if they agreed beforehand to support the official version. How scientific.

The "program manager" for the NIST study of WTC 7 is a 46-year-old named Stephen A. Cauffman from Falls Church/Arlington, Virginia.


Stephen A. Cauffman,
"Program Manager" for NIST WTC 7
Cover-Up

The Vinnova study admits that it was necessary to artificially release trapped air from the vessel in order to reduce its buoyancy, i.e. to make the vessel sink. In other words, the official version that the ship capsized and sank without a hole in the hull is false.

In both cases, Estonia and 9-11, the "scientific" government-sponsored studies are conducted for only one purpose: to support the version of official lies. Talk about wasting taxpayers money!

The NIST studies of 9-11 are more of the same "pathological science" in which "scientists" are paid to prove the official version of events. How utterly pathetic.

Evidently, NIST prefers foreign rather than American-born scientists who might resist such backwards methodology and pathological science.

Here are the official details about the NIST presentation to occur later today on the Internet:

WTC 7 Technical Briefing

On August 26, 2008, from 11:00 am – 1:30 pm EDT (16:00 London time), NIST will hold, via live video webcast, a detailed technical briefing on the investigation of the collapse of WTC 7. A link to the webcast will be available on the NIST WTC website, http://wtc.nist.gov.

Release of Draft Final Reports on WTC 7 for Public Comment

On August 21, 2008 at 11 am EDT, NIST released the draft final reports on WTC 7 for public comment.

The three draft final reports are:

1. Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A)
2. Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1-9)
3. Global Structural Analysis of the Response of World Trade Center Building 7 to Fires and Debris Impact Damage (NCSTAR 1-9A).

The draft final reports are available on the NIST WTC website, http://wtc.nist.gov.

The public is invited to submit comments on the reports by any one of three methods: (1) via e-mail to wtc@nist.govThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ; (2) by fax to 301-869-6275; or (3) by regular mail to:

WTC Technical Information Repository
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8611
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8611

Source: http://www.bollyn.info/home/news/news//

No comments:

Post a Comment