Saturday, August 23, 2008Len Hart
According to official NTSB Flight Data, Flight 93 could not possibly have crashed in the field in PA. The flight data flatly contradicts Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911. Guess which one is lying!
I recently posted that NTSB data indicates Flight 77 never dropped below 273 feet! Therefore, Flight 77 could not have crashed into the Pentagon. The Pentagon is only 71 feet tall. Secondly, according to the black box data, Flight 77 could not have damaged the light poles. 77 was much too high (the poles are only 40 feet) and on the wrong trajectory. Now, Damien, a regular contributor to this blog, has put together an exhaustive survey of equally disturbing holes in the official theories concerning Flight 93 which we have been expected to believe crashed in PA. Following is Damien's report --a damning critique and proof that that the Bush cabal cover stories about Flight 93 are simply impossible and violate the recently discussed "Occam's Razo' by raising infinitely more questions than Bush's theories have been able to explain.
Following is Damien's report:
The evidence discrepancies from Flight 77 are echoed in the absurdities of Flight 93. This from Pilots for 911 Truth:1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.
2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.
3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.
4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.
5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests.
That's right, the flight data recorder has the plane impacting upside down at 40 degrees to the horizontal. You could google all day and never find an image showing where the huge tail hit the ground! You will only ever see vertical impact photos. The only photo shows a smoke plume more consistent with a smaller ordinance explosion. There are no heavy kerosene fumes filling the sky. According to FDR data there was 17.01 tons (5,500 gals) of fuel left at time of impact. Yet the EPA found no ground contamination from jet fuel. Unbelievable!
"We (were) literally surrounded by debris, and there's a very strong odor of scorched earth," witness Jim Parsons reported. "It doesn't smell like jet fuel, it smells like ... How do you describe it? Burned earth. It smells like burned earth." - Pittsburgh Channel (09/11/01)
The impact hole is 75' wide and the aircraft is 125' feet wide. (See also here)
The volume of debris is too small. The only photos released by the authorities showing small debris. Multiple witnesses at the Shanksville site reported on the lack of debris. The FBI claims that it recovers 95 percent of the plane and sent it on to United Airlines. That would be about 60 tons of plane debris. I defy anyone to produce evidence that 60 tons of plane debris was taken from Shankesville or forwarded to UA. Lies!
Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller reported that they had found "unspecified human remains and enough minuscule pieces of plane debris to fill one-third of a dumpster." That's right, 1/3 of a dumpster! This dumpster!
The "recovered" remains, allegedly from Fl93, are anomalous and are suggestive of evidence tampering. -- A terrorist passport found in the streets of New York that "survived" the WTC attacks and a Koran and materials recovered from Mohammed Atta's car all apear to be staged evidence, as does the unmarked red bandana and terrorist driver's licence recovered at Shanksville. When 200 airline seats are totally destroyed you don't expect to find unmarked red bandanas and bibles!
The human remains (600 lbs) does not compare with the passenger weights (4 tons). Modern, high temperature crematoria take 2 hours to burn bodies yet we are expected to believe that 4 tons of human remains disappeared ("vaporised") in an instant leaving only 150- 600lbs of tissue shreds. The temperatures were simply not high enough to dispose of that volume of human remains in such a small time frame. If the bodies burned above ground they would have left a recognizable offensive smell (burnt tissue like at a BBQ) that would have been noticed just like at other aircraft crash sites. Carbon based objects such as humans, luggage and seating require oxygen to burn. If they were burned above ground they would have produced larger amounts of smoke than was seen. Had they passed into the ground they would not have burned because there was no oxygen; they might have been shredded, but not consumed by fire. So if the seats burned above ground then 200 seat frames would be there somehwhere. They're not. Instead, we have this.
Officially, the largest piece found of Fl 93 was a seven-foot-long piece of the fuselage skin, including four windows. Given that the wings are 125' wide with a 40' high tail then that's a load of baloney right there!
There is no verifiable evidence chain of custody on the debris, human remains or FDR.
The FBI refused to allow either the FAA or NTSB carry out investigations required of them by law and which they had undertaken as standard procedure for ALL previous aircraft crashes occuring in the US over many decades. The FBI did NOT carry out any forensic evaluation of the crash nor permit anyone else to do so. That's a profoundly unprofessional course of action given that one caller from Fl 93 late in the flight said a bomb had possibly blown up in the plane.
Neither the NTSB or the FAA handled the evidence, only the FBI. Isn’t that their job? -- yes it is, but they have no legal authority to prohibit, hinder or obstruct legally mandated inquiries by the FAA and the NTSB that should have taken place. They were forbidden from doing so. The FBI also had clear obligations in regard to the handling of evidence which they failed to fulfill. The usual investigative procedures in regard to flight crashes and the handling of evidence were not followed in regard to 911.
Whatever happened at Shanksville, the official 911 account is baloney! In Aug 2006 a Russian plane, almost identical in size to Fl93, crashed in Siberia. They recovered 140 bodies and huge amounts a debris. But nothing like that at Shankesville. --Damien
Clearly, nothing said by the Bush administration about 911 has been true.Also see: NTSB Flight Data: Flight 77 Could Not Have Crashed into the Pentagon
Conan Doyle, by way of his character Sherlock Holmes, left us an invaluable and valid lesson in logic: ''When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!" Thanks to the efforts of thousands of folk though out the nation and the world, one must now conclude hat Bush's official conspiracy theory of 911 is not only impossible, it is a deliberate and consistent lie!
- There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that 'Arab Hijackers' were on board Flight 77. That is 'no evidence', let alone proof!
- There was never any evidence to support the 'Bush' claim that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon; indeed, official NTSB data indicates that Flight 77 COULD NOT have crashed into the Pentagon.That's a major, if not fatal, hole in his theory.
- In New York, Building 7 is seen to have fallen in a 'controlled demolition', admitted to by Larry Silverstein who said the building had been 'pulled'.Why is this still debated?
- Also in New York, numerous witnesses reported evidence of either THERMATE or THERMITE at the wreckage of the TwinTowers! Certainly, kerosene fires could not have and didn't create the 'controlled demolition', in which both towers collapsed precisely into their own footprints.
It is said that those falls were the first of their type. Certainly, unless another inside job is planned, no other towers will ever fall so precisely as the result of a airliner crash and/or a kerosene fire.
The only intelligent conclusion: neither collapse in New York was the result of an airliner crash.
911 was a crime.
Evidence of that crime was ordered destroyed by George W. Bush. That, in and of itself, is yet another crime. Moreover, there is a prima facie case of 'obstruction of justice' against GWB right now in connection with 911. There is probable cause to begin a federal grand jury investigation of the role he most probably played in helping to plan and execute 911. There is also the possibility that it was planned by higher-ups in his administration and Bush, himself, merely signed off on it with the expectation that it would make of him a dictator, like the Riechstag Fire helped Hitler create a Third Reich.
As far as I am concerned, the impossible --Bush';s official theory --has been eliminated; therefore, what remains however implausible is the truth. I don't think I have to spell that out for you. The time has come to demand that the federal grand jury in White Plains New York 'round up the usual suspects' and put them under oath! If and when they lie under oath, charges of perjury and obstruction of justice must follow.
"If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." (George H.W. "Poppy" Bush)It's never too late to do the right thing!