Adding Insult to Injury:
Americans Taxpayers Forced to Support
Zionist Criminal Gang Behind 9-11
The current financial crisis in the United States involves some of the very same Zionist criminals and entities that I pointed out in my recent chapter, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11."
The collapse of their criminal scams on Wall Street could result in more information coming out about the Zionist gangsters behind 9-11. Such outrageous criminal scams cannot be kept hidden for long.
The government loan of $85 thousand millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars ($85 billion) to keep afloat Maurice Greenberg's criminal operation, American International Group (A.I.G.), brings into the spotlight one of the key individuals in the Zionist criminal network behind 9-11.
The criminal head of A.I.G.
As I wrote in the chapter that was published in July 2008:
KROLL, GREENBERG & THE ISRAELIS
Rebuffed in 1987, the Mossad team of Malkin and Shalom didn't give up on Isser Harel's prophecy of 9-11, which meant getting the Port Authority security contract. They simply changed tack and decided to work in a less obvious manner, through dedicated and corrupt American Zionists like Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg. Shalom went to work for Kroll, according to the online 9/11 Encyclopedia entry for Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the CEO of the American International Group (A.I.G.) insurance company…
In 1993, Maurice Greenberg became a partner and co-owner of Jules Kroll's company when A.I.G. bought 23 percent of Kroll. Greenberg is very close to Henry Kissinger, who became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987.
Greenberg was deeply involved in China in the 80s, where Henry Kissinger was one of his representatives, according to the 9-11 Encyclopedia. Through the China trade, Greenberg became close to Shaul Eisenberg, the leader of the Asian section of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, and agent for the sales of sophisticated military equipment to the Chinese military, it reports. Eisenberg was also the owner of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv...
Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll are connected to the key players of 9-11 in so many ways that their connections would fill a book. For the purpose of this chapter, however, there are a few key connections that need to be underlined:
1. Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll became partners in 1993, the same year Kroll Associates "was chosen over three other companies to advise the Port Authority on a redesign of its security procedures." "We have such confidence in them that I have followed every one of their recommendations," Stanley Brezenoff, the Port Authority executive director, told the New York Times in 1994.3. Greenberg's son, Jeffrey W. Greenberg, became CEO of Marsh & McLennan (MMC) in 1999 and chairman in 2000. The first plane of 9-11 flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA, part of Greenberg's company. Mark Wood, an eyewitness, said: "It looked like a mid-sized executive jet and the way it turned suggested it was being aimed deliberately at a target."
2. Kroll controlled security at the World Trade Center complex in 2001 and was responsible for hiring John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism for the FBI, who died on 9-11, reportedly his first day on the new job.
There is much more information about Maurice Greenberg's ties to 9-11 in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11."
Bollyn, Christopher, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11," July 24, 2008
|The WTC 7 Cover Up|| || |
|Written by Christopher Bollyn|
|Tuesday, 16 September 2008|
The Criminal Cover-up
of the 9-11 Demolition
of Larry Silverstein's WTC 7
The owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, a senior Zionist leader and fund-raiser,
told PBS that he decided to "pull it" before watching the tower fall.
NIST's Fraudulent "Final Report on the Collapse of WTC 7"
A Criminal Fraud at Taxpayer Expense
By Christopher Bollyn
After nearly seven years, the U.S. government (NIST) has finally released its "Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7."
As I expected, the NIST report is a cover up and fabrication that has wasted several years and millions of taxpayer dollars to provide a fraudulent explanation about why Larry Silverstein's 47-story WTC 7 collapsed nearly seven hours after the twin towers collapsed on 9-11.
View collapse of Silverstein's tower at:
The Indian "scientist" Sivarag Shyam-Sunder (from New Delhi) and other so-called scientists from NIST desperately attempt to explain with their fraudulent fabrication how the steel-framed skyscraper owned and built by Larry Silverstein (and other Israelis) fell into its own footprint as the result of a few minor fires, while other high-rise towers, such as the Windsor building in Madrid, burned more intensely for more hours - and remained standing.
S. Shyam Sunder and his pile of lies about WTC 7.
The NIST team should be considered accomplices
in the criminal cover-up of 9-11.
The NIST study is a excellent example of what Dr. Steven Jones calls "pathological science." Pathological science starts from an unproven assumption, e.g. WTC 7 collapsed due to a few sporadic fires, and seeks to prove that this is actually what happened. Such attempts, usually government funded, rely on computer simulations in which the critical parameters are tweaked until the desired result occurs, in this case until the tower collapses. That is not science; that's fraud.
...your results are completely speculative and have no connection with the reality of what happened to that building. You are simply “adding epicycles” to a theory based on a false premise.
Dr. Wyndham concluded:
Your theory, if believed, has extremely serious consequences for the steel building construction industry and society in general. For this reason, it is doubtful whether anyone will embrace it. On the contrary, there is likely to be a public reaction that will expose its falsity. In addition, a vast and growing number of citizens of this and other countries are now on the march toward a truthful and independent accounting of 9/11. Your theory lacks scientific credibility. It is certain to be repudiated by future generations if not this one.
I don't intend to wait for future generations to expose this fraud. In a very similar "study" (i.e. computer manipulation), the Swedish state funded the Vinnova computer simulation of the Estonia ferry catastrophe of 1994. Scientists were chosen to participate in the Vinnova project only if they agreed beforehand to support the official version. How very scientific.
Stephen A. Cauffman,
"Program Manager" for NIST's
Cover-Up of the WTC 7 Demolition
The recently concluded Swedish state-sponsored Vinnova study is very similar to NIST's "pathological science." The Swedish report honestly admitted that it was necessary to artificially release air from the vessel in their simulation in order to reduce its buoyancy, i.e. to make the vessel sink. This shows they were unable to achieve their intended result and proves that the official version that the ferry capsized and sank without a hole in the hull is false.
The draft final reports are available on the NIST WTC website, http://wtc.nist.gov.
My response on the NIST final report on WTC 7 follows:
Open Letter to NIST in Response to the
"Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7"
PAPER BEATS STEEL?
An American Protests the
Fraudulent NIST Report Posing as Science
Madrid's Windsor Tower burned like a torch...
for many hours at temperatures above 800 degrees Celsius...
yet remained standing.
3. The report does not mention Larry Silverstein's public comment about "pulling" the building. How can you ignore Silverstein's admission that the building was "pulled," i.e. demolished?
In a PBS documentary, Larry Silverstein, the owner of WTC 7,
admitted to having "pulled" the tower before watching it fall.
Unfortunately, gentlemen, the "probable collapse sequence" in your final report about WTC 7 report is not only improbable, it is absolutely impossible.