Thursday, November 6, 2008

Dealing with The Great Mirage

The Greanville Journal

November 5th, 2008

President Elect Barack Obama in Chicago, shortly after being declared the projected winner of the 2008 election. After Nov. 4, the Obama brand may be the world’s most valuable brand.

Peeling away the layers of the Greatest Show on Earth

The Obama victory presents the authentic Left with a genuine challenge, one just as tricky as if John McCain had been pronounced the victor in the latest exercise in American managed elections. At a point when the Empire’s massive moral, political, and economic crimes had begun to threaten the continuing legitimacy of capitalist rule; when the old machinery of rhetoric and delusions that allow the US corporate oligarchy to rule pretty much undisturbed by the demands and needs of the masses was beginning to show signs of fatigue, they seem to have found a savior in Barack Obama, the ideal politician toplant hope, confound skeptics at home and replenish luster to America’s name abroad.

Still, no matter what his supporters or enemies may say or wish to believe about the man, Barack Obama’s career is not that of a fiery reformer, let alone revolutionist. Obama is first and above all a cautious centrist, an opportunist in the Clintonian mould, and therefore a skillful accommodationist to the powers that be. Obama’s temperament is calculating, triangulation comes naturally to him, his fire in the belly (for a former community organizer) seems to be missing, or curiously muted, and his unspoken motto seems to be “get along by going along.” That should be obvious from the affectionate manner–some have even called it “boosterist”— in which the empire’s toxic tentacles, most notably the corporate media, embraced him from the start, during the 2004 Democratic Party coronation, which marked his debut in Big Party Politics.

Considering the shabby and disrespectful treatment accorded genuine critics of the status quo such as Ralph Nader or Dennis Kucinich, among others, this unmerited adulation, this sudden infatuation by the press, should have alerted us that not all was what it seemed with Obama.

Thus, whatever we may want to read in this election, and far too many people—after the long night of reaction and ruthless conservatism that culminated with the Bush-Cheney regime—would like to read the arrival of a messiah and a new era in American politics, the fact remains that Obama remains a mirage where the symbolic —first Black chief executive in the White House—far exceeds the substance, not to mention the record. And therein lies the risk of a long period of successful demagoguery on behalf of the system’s policies, with a salesman of perhaps unmatched talents at the top, one capable of selling us policies of mild meliorism in critical areas such as health and the environment as if they were audacious accomplishments or the very limits of what this nation can do.

This site has carried numerous pieces analyzing Obama [see below], many penned by leading African American intellects with long track records of uncompromising activism on behalf of Black people and ordinary Americans, and by equally astute white observers. On the whole the balance is less than encouraging. It appears that most unbiased progressive commentators who have followed Barack Obama’s career closely reach for their pen not so much to praise Obama—leaving the fluff aside there’s so far little to praise except for his onetime opposition to the Iraq War (since diluted)—but to denounce him.

Warning signs

Obama—let this be said for him—does not hide his establishmentarian leanings. Not surprising then, that this November 5th, the day after a memorable election, there’s already talk in the Obama camp of the “need for national unity”, “bipartisanship”, “harmony”—and similar words that sound awfully good to a country exhausted by a whole generation of extreme rightwing divisionism, a country yearning to heal this rift—but whose connotations in the current context may mean something entirely different than what the public understands.

Tell me who you hang out with and I’ll tell you who you are

But “unity”, like “freedom” can mean many things, depending on the context. Fact is, the early call for unity offers us critical clues to Obama’s true political personality, for behind such ostensible high-mindedness the new president gives himself the freedom to pick a cabinet and entourage of advisers from precisely the same old discredited quarters (the reigning plutocracy or its hangers on) that gave us Iraq, the financial meltdown (and subsequent open-ended theft of the treasury to the tune of trillions), plus rapid immiseration of tens of millions of Americans, not to mention the rape of the environment and obscene levels of inequality for a nation still formally defined as a democratic republic. (Wall Street, not known for high principles, gave hundreds of millions to the Democratic ticket this year). Yes, expect Republicans in key positions in an Obama regime. All for the sake of national harmony. And Obama will not end the primacy of the Zionist Neocons (he just named Rahm Emanuel, a notorious Democratic party insider and fierce Zionist as Chief of Staff) in Washington, nor Israel’s deforming influence on US foreign policy, for he already paid AIPAC the obligatory visit to guarantee obeisance to this powerful lobby’s viewpoints and priorities. (Admittedly, as things stand in the Empire at this point, he has little room to maneuver any type of defiance.)

More worrisome, as both Obama and Biden have frequently intimated under the guise of preparing the people for the “hard road ahead” and the “tough things we need to do in order improve our national security against all enemies,” this administration may actually end up presiding over a significant expansion of the current wars in the Middle East to new theaters inside Pakistan itself and beyond.

In sum, those who expect the Israeli lobby, the eternal militarists, the free-market wackos, the professional patriots, the corporate lobbyists, the Wall Street mob, etc., to be thrown out of the temple in an Obama administration, will be sorely disappointed. For their expectations are—to put it charitably—grossly unfounded as perhaps one of the most discomfiting features of Obama’s victory is that, as the prescient Ralph Nader puts it in the video interview we reproduce below, this is a “landslide without a mandate.” Meanwhile, under the slogan already in ample circulation, “in America anything is possible,” the corporatists have recharged (albeit momentarily) their franchise and are busy rebuilding their tattered legitimacy. The work for those who yearn for real change, for real democracy, has never been more urgent, but with Obama in the White House, the obstacles may be paradoxically greater.—Patrice Greanville


And check also these related essays on Obama:

Barack Obama and the Winds of War: Turning Right \ By BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford \

Obama’s Audacious Deference to Power | Paul Street

Barack Obama: Hypocrisy on Health Care |


No comments:

Post a Comment