Thursday, April 30, 2009

Surprise! Census Comes Early, With A GPS To Map Your FRONT DOOR

The 2010 census has started in 2009.

I have already confronted two census workers this year.

The first, in February, was an older lady who came to the door and asked if she could get some information. I let her and her laptop in and answered some questions, refused on others and she said OK, it was not mandatory and left.

The second was just last week . A man parked out front for a while and then drove next door to an unoccupied house that I also own and stopped, got out and went to the front door. I walked over and asked if I could help him. He explained he was from the census and wanted to know if anyone lived in the house. I told him no but he still wanted to know the street address number of the house. I said I didn't know as I have never had to use it and he thanked me and left.

Both appeared to be just average people, hired hands for the government doing a job they were paid for. I didn't see if they had a GPS unit.


From: Right Soup

I know, you thought the census (now well in control of Rahm Emanuel) didn’t start until 2010! Well, seems that workers have begun already, coming door-to-door with handheld GPS units and questions about every garage and storage barn on your property. Robert LaMacchia, head of the Census Bureau’s geography division, says they’ll capture the latitude and longitude of the front door of every house, apartment and improvised shelter they find.”We will actually knock on doors and look for hidden housing units,” he says. “We will find converted garages; from the outside, it may not look like anybody lives there.” This is so the census will end up with the geographic coordinates — accurate to within 10 feet — for about 110 million residences.

The US Census Bureau is currently going door-to-door, nationwide, to place YOUR front door “coordinates” into a Global Positioning System (GPS) for marking/mapping purposes; without your consent - and if you are not home - without your knowledge. Now, why does anyone need GPS Coordinates on every front door in America? Who is really doing this? What good reason can they possibly have for such an expensive project? Listen to this interview with citizen Jane Lesko on the Power Hour and find out more. (The interview starts about 7/8 of an inch in on the podcast slider)

From Channeling Reality:

The U.S. Census Bureau is doing an Address Canvassing Operation using GPS- equipped handheld computers to GPS every front door of homes, apartments, converted garages, homeless shelters, and anything they believe that someone might live in, in America, so that the Bureau can send every household a Census Questionnaire in March of 2010. (There are other people we have spoken to who believe that the GPS front doors of America may be used for MILITARY purposes and that this is a violation of privacy. They want the exact location of your front door.)

The U.S. Census Bureau awarded Shreveport, La.-based Michael Baker Jr. Inc. an estimated $10 million contract for data collection services that involve Global Positioning System (GPS) technology.

From the Baker Website:

The company, an engineering unit of Michael Baker Corp., won the multi-year award to support the bureau’s Geography Division in updating a key geographic data system. Baker has been a partner to the United States military since the 1940’s, supporting Department of Defense (DoD) operations spanning the globe. We understand the culture and know the demands and responsibilities facing installation commanders.

We’ve mastered support processes by focusing top architectural, planning, engineering, and geospatial and mapping talent to supply cost-effective, timely and innovative solutions that are aligned with the diverse missions of each military organization. While force structures, weaponry and missions change, Baker helps keep America’s military installations fully mission capable. Baker is putting life cycle planning concepts for a multitude of federal, state, and local clients. Since 1972, our all-risk, all-hazards approach has helped clients plan and prepare for natural disasters, technological emergencies, internal/external risks, and terrorist threats. Our diverse staff of emergency planning and response specialists, planners, engineers, and architects supports a broad range of multi-discipline projects.

Baker (NYSE Amex: BKR), founded in 1940, provides professional engineering and consulting expertise for public and private sector clients worldwide. The Company’s markets of focus include Aviation, Defense, Environmental, Facilities, Geospatial Information Technologies, Homeland Security, Municipal & Civil, Pipelines & Utilities, Transportation, and Water. Services span the complete life cycle of infrastructure and managed asset projects, including planning, design, construction services, asset management, and asset renewal.

The Census, in it’s own words, has been “re-engineered”, including the mandate to “Collect and tabulate long-form data every year throughout the decade through a large household survey (The American Community Survey).”

ACORN signed on as a national partner with the U.S. Census Bureau in February 2009 to assist with the recruitment of the 1.4 million temporary workers needed to go door-to-door to count every person in the United States — currently believed to be more than 306 million people.

The 2010 census will be the “short form”, however, there is the clever subterfuge of the “American Community Survey” which is purposely not called a census and is sent to a “sampling” of US homes such that each home receives one not more than once every five years. Its what they used to call the long form as the 2010 census will only contain the short form. Here is a link to the questions on the survey.

Why does the government (and ACORN) need to have the GPS coordinates of your FRONT DOOR? Your house is probably on Google Maps already. But the front door? Sounds like a jackboot convenience to me. This is a developing story, and several reports of those who have already been visited by the GPS squad can be found in this forum thread.

Source: Right Soup

Thanks to Saladin for the link.

The Law of Compensation Regarding Conservatives and Zionism.

A comment from a previous post recommended A World Of Our Own. Here is an interesting essay. Food for thought.

You cannot gain national power in this country without the approval or consent of Jewish power. You’re best off if the Jews fully support you. But, if the Jews don’t like you or your views, you must at least win their consent or mild approval. And for conservatives the only way to win this approval is by supporting Zionism 100%. Doing so the conservative candidate will win support from conservative Jews, who though outnumbered by liberal Jews, are very rich and influential. He will also face less hostility from liberal Jews who, though opposed to conservative values and policies, are pro-Zionist and would know that the conservative goy politician at least knows how to kiss Jewish ass. Liberal Jews may be more critical of Israel than conservative Jews are, but liberal Jews range from the likes of Alan Dershawitz, an ardent Israel Hawk, to the Nation magazine which, despite its harsh criticism of Israel, believes in the ‘right of Israel to exist’(which means no ‘right of return’ for displaced Palestinians and no right for Palestine to exist on the land which Israel now occupies).

Anyway, the point is gaining national power is impossible without either the support or some degree of approval of the Jews. Since most Jews(oligarches of the media and academia)are opposed to conservative values and policies, how may conservatives reduces the hostility from the vastly powerful Jewish community? Zionism is the only answer. Since even liberal Jews love Zionism, conservatives can make themselves acceptable, if not exactly appealing, to the Jewish power brokers who pull the purse strings and run much of the academia/media.

The Law of Compensation says THE MORE CONSERVATIVE A CANDIDATE IS ON SOCIAL ISSUES, THE MORE ZIONIST HE MUST BE ON THE ISSUE OF ISRAEL. The more a candidate opposes stuff like ‘gay marriage’, open door immigration policy, affirmative discrimination, miscegenation(or miscegenocide of the white race), gun restrictions, and multiculturalism, the more he must embrace Israel dearly and nearly and early and curly. That is the nature of the bargain in current politics. If you oppose the social or political policies that Jews favor in America, you must compensate by supporting Israel 100%, 200%, or 300%.

Even among ‘conservative’ Jews, a good many support GOP mainly for the reason that it happens to be more pro-Zionist than the Democratic Party. If Zionism were to go away as an issue, I suspect half the Jewish Republicans would join the Democratic Party. So, even though 18% of Jews voted for McCain in 2008, if the issue of Zionism were taken off the table, it probably would have been 90%. Jews are 2-3% of the US population, but 60% of donations to the Democratic Party come from Jews, and 35% of donations to the Republican Party comes from Jews. Even though Republicans receive less from Jews than do Democrats, Jews are still the biggest donor group for the GOP. If Jews are 2% of the US population, then conservative Jews are .4% of the US population. Yet, 35% of the donation to McCain’s campaign came from Jews. So, both parties are beholden to Jewish money and power. People think Mitt Romney is a rich guy, but he only made $250 million, which is laughable chump change to Jews who make up over 48% of all the billionaires in this country.

So, sucking up to Jews is an absolute necessity in this country. Meritocracy is a good thing, but it doesn’t just favor the most qualified individuals; it favors certain groups over others because certain groups have more individuals possessed of certain talents. For example, meritocracy in sports had led to domination by blacks. And, meritocracy in academics and business had led to the domination of Jews. Yes, individual blacks and Jews succeeded above the rest–and there are plenty of blacks who failed in sports and plenty of Jews who never grew rich. But, the fact is certain sectors do become dominated by individuals who share a common background, common race or ethnicity. Since people of the same ethnicity or race tend to share similar values, assumptions, and ideas, the end result of meritocracy is not the triumph of individualism but the triumph of certain groups over others. Sports is about triumph of black power over non-black power. As such, blacks are worshiped by white boys and white girls as the alpha-male race. White men have become sheepish white boys groveling before the big tough cool black dudes, and white girls wanna put out to black studs and give birth to little Obamas.
Business world has seen the triumph of Jewish power. Jews get to own and control business, come up with financial tricks, and make billions; when the system collapses due to their financial crookedness, they use the government to bail them out. Since media operations require lots of talent and brain power–and lots of money–, Jews were bound to gobble up all the media as well. Some say there’s Fox TV and point out that Murdoch isn’t Jewish, but the cultural department of Fox Inc. has been headed by a liberal Jew. Also, Fox has been as corrupting as Hollywood with little in the way of conservative values. Also, Sean Hannity and those Talk Show conservatives are a bunch of blowhard idiots who suck up to Israel night and day. They are all a bunch of slaves to Jewish power just the same.

This is why Ayn Rand-ism is worthless to the white gentile race. It doesn’t help us. In sports and pop culture(which has become a kind of pornographic gladiator sports), blacks rule totally thanks to meritocratism. In business, Jews rule. There’s nothing left in it for us. In Ayn Rand fantasies, the great titans are usually tall, handsome goy men, but look at our society, look at reality. The titans of culture and business are funny looking Jews. And, though they make their fortunes through the cutthroat Ayn Rand way, they hold and push leftist or liberal views that empower them even further.

Their leftism is opportunistic, tribal, and idealistic. It’s opportunistic because bigger government is simply another means for rich folks and their kids to rule society politically as well as economically. It’s tribal because it’s in the Jewish interest to make US more diverse so that Jews can play different groups against one another like Jerry Springer plays white and black trash guests on his show. (This is why Mel Gibson said, "Jews start all wars"). . Also, it’s in the Jewish interest to castrate white men into white boys and to divide white women and white men. Destroy the cultural, sexual, and historical unity of white men and white women, and the white race is finished. This is the REAL aim of feminism. It’s not about women power. It’s about brainwashing white women to side with Jews, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, gays, and other ‘victim’ groups against the Evil White Male. Notice that feminists go easy on instances of non-white male oppression of women. Indeed, feminists get more worked up about white conservative males who believe in full freedom for women than against Muslim males who treat their women like property or against black males who treat their women like whores.

Anyway, the Law of Compensation is something we must be aware of because it has poisoned the well of conservative politics. And, no one was a bigger poster boy of the danger of this rule than George W. Bush. We know that Bush’s social policies were detested by the Jewish community. I didn’t like some of them myself as the Christian Right is pretty stupid. Anyway, the fact is Bush’s social policies were very conservative in certain areas. Jews in this country are mainly interested in social and domestic issues, even more so than in Israel. Jews want us to accept ‘gay marriage’, open borders(and illegal ‘immigration’), multiculturalism which blames white people for all the problem of the world(Jews excepted of course), radical feminism(which divides white man and white woman), gun restrictions, and interracism(whereby white women are goaded and encouraged to give birth to black babies). Many white conservatives are opposed to these Jewish policies. As such, the Jews denounce white conservatives as ‘racists’, ‘xenophobes’, ‘homophobes’, ‘sexists’, and other stupid slurs they pulled out of their hairy arses. Since Jews are so powerful, how can conservatives hope to succeed on the national political stage against the might of the Jewish controlled liberal media? The only way is to woo the Jew is by being even more Zionist than the Jews themselves. And that was the essence of Bush’s foreign policy.

Jews hated Bush, but they tolerated him because he was a foreign policy puppet of Neocon Zionists. Though neocons and liberal Jews don’t see eye to eye on many issues, there is a Jewish camaraderie between the two groups. And, both sides agree mostly if not 100% on Israel. Though liberal Jews at NY Times, CNN, ABC News, New Republic, Time, and Newsweek will insist that they were duped into supporting the Iraq War because the Bush administration lied about intelligence reports, they really supported Bush’s war because they thought it would be good for Israel. Neocons and Jewish liberals came together to support Bush’s war in the hope of re-making the Middle East so that Israel will be safer. And if Iraq War had turned out well, liberal Jews would not be complaining that no WMD were found. They would be happy that the Middle East had been made safe for Israel. They would have lauded Bush on the war. Of course, they would still hate Bush on social issues and look for some other reason than the war to unseat him. But, the fact is Bush won some degree of Jewish consent if not support when his foreign policy turned out to be overwhelmingly pro-Israel.

And, we see this over and over among nearly all national conservative politicians. The more they espouse conservative social values and policies, the louder they scream about how Israel is dear to us, precious to us, close to us, and blah blah. You’d think they care more for Israel than for the US. This is why Ron Paul never had a chance. Whatever his faults and merits, he stood for policies at odds with the Jewish community and had the guts to criticize Israel. He violated the Law of Compensation. So did Pat Buchanan. If you’re gonna go against the Jews on social policy, you MUST compensate by groveling before the Jews on the issue of Israel. Ron Paul and Buchanan violated the Law.
Problem with Bush is he took this too far and embarrassed the Jews. He was such an ass-kisser of the Jews on the issue of Israel that more and more people around the world began to think, "JEWS REALLY DO CONTROL AMERICA." People on both the Right and Left all over the world saw Bush as a toady of Israel and American Jews. They saw Bush’s strings pulled by Neocon Jews.

Jews are always hungry for more power in reality, but they want to appear powerless in public. They want to own billions but want to act like they just walked out of a shtetl or a Nazi death camp. But, Bush’s slavishness to Jews on foreign policy made Jews look very powerful. A book like "Israel Lobby" would have been dismissed at any other time, but it received a degree of positive attention because it became obvious who holds the REAL power and wealth in America during the Bush era.
It must be said the ‘Israel Lobby’ is a misnomer. It should be called the USrael lobby as there is no distinct barrier between Israel and the US. Jews go back and forth from NY, LA, or Washington DC to Israel. Israel is more powerful in Washington DC than all the other countries combined. It is more powerful and influential than any of the 50 American states. This is not because US is under Israeli occupation but because it’s under Jewish-American occupation. Israel is powerful in the US because Jewish Americans are powerful. If US had no Jews, Israel would have no power over us. But, American Jews hold the media, academia, and the purse strings.
They’ve been telling us over and over that Israel is special to us. We didn’t decide this on our own. No, Israel’s importance to us was fed to us by the Jewish media and academia. We’ve told that we love Israel because Israel is a democracy like ours, Israel was founded much like the US was, Israel has been a staunch ally during the Cold War, etc. These are not OUR thoughts and sentiments. No, they are thoughts and feeling dictated to us by the Jewish media. Following the logic and reasons given by Jews as to why we love Israel, we can make a counter-argument on the same grounds. If US was founded upon rebellion against oppressive authority, we could just as well side with Palestinians who could be compared to American colonialists and minutemen. If democracy is so dear to us, we can say Palestinians are fighting for equal rights, equal dignity, and equal claim to their ancestral land. If the issue of Cold War allegiance is what makes Israel dear to us, then let us remember that NO GROUP in the US did more to spy for the USSR, aid and abet radical leftist groups, stir up black rage and hatred against whites, supported Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, and undermine our efforts in Vietnam than Jewish-Americans. Jews were the biggest thorn on our side during the Cold War era. Jews were by far the most radical, most anti-American, the most communist-sympathizing group in America. So, the reasons that are given as to why we love Israel are not our own reasons; they are reasons foisted upon us by the Jewish media. If we need to understand anything, it’s that we must stop allowing Jews to think for us. We must think on our own according to what’s good for OUR interests. Jews in America and Israel are not good for our interests.

Anyway, Bush went overboard with the Law of Compensation. Jews want politicians to support Jewish interests but don’t want them to look beholden to Jews. That would mean that Jews are indeed powerful. Bush made Jews look all-powerful. Much of the Bush hatred around the world had an element of distrust, resentment, and even hatred of Jewish-American power. Many Europeans envy and hate Hollywood and American pop culture’s control over the world. Their criticism of American policies is often really an attack on Jewish-American power. But, as Jews are linked to the Holocaust and due to Europe’s long history of antisemitism, Europeans would rather not say it so openly. Europeans did notice that Bush was 200% pro-Israel and his foreign policy seemed guided and controlled by neocon Jews. Also, the world wondered why liberal Jewish institutions supported the war. Why did NY Times and New Republic give their thumbs up and fan the war fever? Why was much of the liberal Jewish media coverage of the war so favorable(in the early stages)? We know why. The Jews thought the war would stabilize the Middle East and that it would be good for Israel. Jews, both neocons and liberals, wanted to show the world how an America-guided-by-Jewish-power could fix the world’s problems. But, the war went very badly. The world began to say ‘we told you so’ and started to blame America for its arrogance and hubris. This is when liberal Jews all jumped ship and tried to put all the blame on Bush. They acted all innocent and said they’d been duped by Bush the liar. The neocons couldn’t jump ship so easily as they had positioned themselves within the GOP power structure. But, even neocons who had been behind the war found various excuses to support Obama in 2008. Yep, it’s the Jewish way. No principles, no loyalty. Just their conniving self-interest.

Iraq War or no Iraq War(and its political fallout), the Jews would have supported Obama anyway. Obama is their boy. He’s the child of black male/white female sexual union. He is the template of what Jews want to happen to all of white America. Jews want white males to be emasculated into metrosexual quasi-homos and white females to open throw themselves at black men. This will destroy white power forever, and Jews will be All-Powerful forever. Jews want to control a black guy who would morally and spiritually lord over a bunch of pussified, sappy, dorky, and self-loathing white boys and jungle-feverish girls. Jews also want to remake the black community. Jews want blacks as moral allies–Jews, victims of Holocaust, linked with blacks, victims of slavery(both victims of white racial oppression). But, too many blacks resent Jewish success and blame Jews for a lot of black problems. Many blacks also side with Palestinians against Israel. So, it was in the interest of Jews to prop up a clean-cut black guy who would challenge the crazy styles of Al Sharpton and his ilk who are hostile to Jews. But, Jews were careful to make sure that Obama didn’t appear totally pro-Jewish as that would make Obama seem like a puppet of Jews. So, Obama has been allowed to associate with some Palestinian-Americans and dilly-dally with the likes of Wright and Nation of Islam followers. This would give cover to Obama’s dependence on the Jews.

Obama is useful to the Jews because it gives the false impression that US is no longer presided by a Jewish puppet–Bush. Many idiots actually think Obama is his own man when he’s really beholden to Jews even more than Bush ever was. Bush was beholden only to neocon Jews whereas Obama is beholden to both neocon and liberal Jews. And, record amount of Jewish money went to supporting Obama. And the Jew-run media gave Obama favorable cult-like coverage like you wouldn’t believe. Now, some people will say that many Obama supporters in the media are non-Jews, but as Jews own all those media outlets, Jews have hired mostly liberal pro-Jewish gentiles over the yrs. So, even gentiles in the media were handpicked by the Jews. (And, as a disproportionate number of "conservatives" on TV and radio are Jews, even they will never ever criticize Jewish power. Jewish conservatives will rail against the Left, but never against the Jewish Left–despite the fact that Jews pretty much define and control the Left. Jewish conservatives will specifically go after Mexican power, Chinese power, Saudi power, or Muslim power, but they’ll never attack Jewish power–despite the fact that Left in this country is largely Jewish, especially at the top.)

Obama is also useful to Jews because Bush’s aggressive Zionism has failed. Bush ended up destabilizing the Middle East and only increased the ire of many Muslims who came to see US as a totally Jew-controlled nation. Though Bush was 200% pro-Israel, this backfired on the Jews. It made it seem as though Bush was doing EVERYTHING for Israel. So, the cunning Jews decided to go with Obama, supposedly a fair-minded person because of his multi-racial and multi-religious background. But, it is all a sham. The only thing about Obama that isn’t pro-Jewish is his ideology of black identity. There is indeed an element of Black Power-ism in Obama, but Obama the sly fox is as cunning as the Jews. He knows that Jews have all the money and power in the US. He always knew that he had to play along to Jewish interests and power. So, Obama has suppressed his black power side of his ideology.
Other than black power ideology, Obama’s influences are all Jewish. He came under the influence of Marxism, a Jewish theory. He went to Ivy League schools and hung around radicals, a good many of them Jews. And, his spiritual mentor was Saul Alinsky, another dirty left-wing Jew. His professors were Jewish. His associates were Jewish. His big money men have been Jewish.

But, Jews don’t want Obama to act totally beholden to the Jews. Bush did that, and it actually made it worse for the Jews because world came to see who has the real power in America. So, Obama is supposed to act like he is independent, is his own man, a brilliant thinker of staggering intellect(though Jews do all the thinking for him), and fairminded to all peoples. And, so many people have fallen for this crap, which goes to show how stupid the world is.
But, even foreign people who see through this charade like the fact that Obama is president because they want US to be humiliated. The idea of a black guy becoming president means, for many people around the world, that the evil whites are losing grip of their country. Whites are now ruled by a black man who belongs to the race that had once served as slaves in America; whites have now become the spiritual and moral slaves of blacks(and financial and political slaves of Jews).

Another reason why Obama doesn’t have to be slavish to Jewish interests(at least publicly) is that he supports the social policies that Jews want. Deep down inside, Obama is for ‘gay marriage’, open borders for illegal invasion, taking guns away from whites, multiculturalism which blames whites for all the problems in the world, global welfare, radical feminism which divides and weakens the white race(as only white males are routinely attacked by feminism while non-white men still qualify as ‘victims’ under the ‘people of color’ banner). Since Obama is for all the social policies that Jews want to push on us, the Law of Compensation doesn’t apply to him. The Law only applies to conservatives because they must make up for angering Jews on social issues. Again, the only way conservatives can make up for pissing off the Jews on issues like ‘gay marriage’ is by supporting Zionism 100%. Bush took this to the logical limit, and Jews got burned because it made Jews look too powerful(which they really are). These are things we must understand if we are to confront Jewish power and see it for what it.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

House Passes Hate Crime Bill - Jewish Groups Rejoice

Would I be breaking this soon to be law by posting this?

The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, HR 1913 has passed the House.

A very partisan and fraudulent Congress bowed to the wishes of Obama and various jewish groups who pushed for passage.

Jewish groups are hailing House passage of hate-crimes legislation.

ADL Hails House Approval of Hate Crime Legislation

18 Republicans voted for the bill while 17 Democrats voted against it. The tally was 249 to 175.

There are many opinions on what the negative effects of this law will be to free speech and how it may be twisted to prosecute and censor anyone who may decide to speak about a 'repressed' minority.

One thing is not an opinion. The Feds will be able to step into state and local jurisdictions in violation of the constitution just by crying 'hate.'
Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine said;

"The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act allocates crucial federal resources to assist states and local law enforcement in their efforts to prevent and prosecute hate crimes."

I have no hate in my heart for any group, nor do I advocate violence against anyone. Would this bill give someone outside of myself the authority to decide that I do? In order to 'prevent' a hate crime?

The only minority this bill is intended to protect is the one who is continually screaming 'anti-semitic' to anyone who speaks out about the crimes of Israel and the treasonous actions of dual American/Israeli citizens and their allies who are moving to destroy our society and culture for their profit and power.

Blacks, gays and any other group that thinks this bill is to protect them have been betrayed.

This bill is just another step to complete control of every thing we say or do.

And a certain minority group is behind it all.

It's all about them.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Invasive If Not Controlled
wisteria - middle Tn April 28, 2009

Government in all of its known forms is pretty much like a creeping wisteria. Planted as a baby it grows...and grows...and overwhelms everything in its path.

My 'gift' of a foot tall wisteria 28 years ago soon became a 30 ft. x 15 ft. monster. Faced with a disgruntled partner who didn't like the invasive nature, I was forced to dig and chop and cut to get it to a manageable size, in a predefined area and held up by a strong support in plain sight.

Still, every year I have to go through the ritual of downsizing. The damn thing refuses to stay in place. More work, more cutting.

But you know what. Since I have gotten it under control, it's starting to bloom. It never did that before.

Our invasive government is not blooming.

It's time to cut and chop.

But the blade is dull from use and without the help from family, neighbors and friends in a multiplying effect, the invasiveness is too much to overcome.


Don't take the vaccine.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Bart Gordon Responds to H.R. 1207... sort of "Nancy Pelosi sends a disk every Monday morning containing all the important issues and what my talking points are to be. H.R. 1207 seems to be missing from my list of things to do."

I asked Mr. Gordon, Tennessee's 6th district congressman, to become a sponsor for H.R. 1207. I also asked him why the bill would not be in the best interests of his constituents. His answer was less than encouraging.
Dear Kenneth,

Thank you for sharing your support for H.R. 1207, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act. Hearing from you helps me better represent Middle Tennessee.

I understand your view that auditing the Federal Reserve would provide much needed transparency. As a nation, we must practice fiscally responsible policies to recover from this economic crisis as quickly as possible. The House Committee on Financial Services is reviewing this legislation regarding the role and efficiency of the Federal Reserve. I am not a member of that committee, but will keep your views in mind should a bill come to the House floor for a vote.

Again, thank you for your input on this important issue. As always, if I may be of assistance to you or your family, please do not hesitate to call on me.

Ron Paul still is plugging along and now has 91 sponsors.

Ron Paul on HR 1207: Update 4/27/09

The message has been sent to Congress over and over again. Don't mess with the Fed.

Patrick Lafferty speculates on the cowards in Congress and why they are reluctant to address the Federal Reserve issue.

Not since the assassination of Congressman Larry McDonald--when the International Banking Cartel decided to murder the 290 passengers aboard KAL flight 007 over Soviet airspace and the coverup after as to the reason why--has the issue not escaped Americans.

Just as former Senator John Tower and his daughter were among 23 persons murdered on April 5, 1991 when the twin-engine commuter plane they were aboard crashed while trying to land at an airport in Brunswick, GA--and the death of Senator John Heinz and six other people were killed on the previous day of April 4, 1991.

Heinz's death occurred when a Bell 412 helicopter collided with the Senator's Piper Aerostar plane over Merion Elementary School in Lower Merion Township, Pennsylvania. All aboard the two aircraft and two first-grade girls playing outside the school were killed. The helicopter had been dispatched to check out a problem with the landing gear of Heinz's plane. While moving in for a closer look, the helicopter's rotor blades struck the bottom of the plane, causing both aircraft to lose control and crash.

These two Senators, who had seats on the Senate banking and Finance Committees, were involved with the Council on Foreign Relations.

Their deaths coincide with the efforts of McDonald and during June, 1989, the battle, waged at the state level, had once again reached Congress. Representative Henry Gonzalez of Texas, introduced House Resolution 1469, calling for the abolition of the Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System. He also introduced House Resolution 1470, calling for the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

During the same session, Representative Phil Crane of Illinois, introduced H.R. 70, calling for an annual audit of the Federal Reserve, none of which ever made it to daylight.

Along with the death of Charles Lindbergh's son, the poisoning of Louis McFadden, JKF and RFK and several other IBC assassinations, efforts to get to the heart of the Fed and it's total corruption have been met with resistance.

Today, we can without hesitation make a stand to force our pathetic legislators to sponsor H. Res 1207 and get the accountability and action we have been denied for too many years.

Ron Paul's legislation HR 1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, is gaining support. HR 1207 has 91 co-sponsors and real potential to pass - BUT only if we educate and rally the people to support it and get our Congresspeople to put it to vote and pass it. {source - OpEdNews}

Mr. Gordon needs to represent his constituents, not special interests and the elite bankers of the Federal Reserve. Failure to do so could mean the Bye Bye Bart chorus becomes reality.

Tripping on Tamiflu

The Obama administration has released 12.5 million of the nation's stockpile of 50 million courses of Tamiflu, a drug that has shown itself at least initially to be effective against the flu virus. The Pentagon has readied 7 million courses for military personnel. {more}

I'm not one to tell anyone what to do but my one experience with Tamiflu taught me 'never again.' Would I encourage loved ones to take it? Not a chance.

Having long enjoyed a good altered state of consciousness, I learned that tripping on Tamiflu may not be for everyone.

The story is from 1999 when I had what I found out later was pneumonia. I went to a doctor three times, who later had his license taken away for drug addiction . The second time he said "I know what to do." It was a script for Tamiflu, a newly approved 'miracle' drug.

The second night of taking it was the most unusual state of mind I have ever experienced.
Words really can't describe it. I was in a place where humans can't function. A realization that we are just a combination of cells held together in the most fragile way imaginable. A sense that we are always on the edge of death in a body that defies explanation. A place where words have little meaning. I actually thought it was my last night on earth and was seeing the never never land between life and death. After several hours, I finally came 'down.'

I recovered after being sent to an oncologist with the referral doctor's words that I probably had leukemia. After an x-ray, a correct diagnosis and 7 days of intravenous antibiotics I was fine.

Tamiflu has been linked to convulsions, delirium and bizarre deaths. From what I experienced, I'll have to err on the side of caution and take my chances without it.

As with all big pharma drugs and the profiteers who push them, it's let the buyer beware.


Dress Rehearsal

Tamiflu drug made with cocktail of chemical ingredients, linked with bizarre behavior

More on Tamiflu from Natural News

"Alternative" media and sycophant "truthers" run amok with swine flue propaganda

(Al Gore's) Venture capital firm set to reap rewards on swine flu (along with Donald Rumsfeld)

Government Flu

Surfing the Swine Flu Wave

Swine Flu Psy Op

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Treason Fest™ 2009

The excitement is surely building. Only a week to go until the annual AIPAC Policy conference when several US elected officials and associated shills will remind the world who they really work for.

Even Tel Aviv Jane Harman is scheduled to give opening remarks and to discuss "an insider's look at the Middle East," if she is not deemed too radioactive.

Over 300 members of Congress reportedly attended in 2008 but the guest list for this year has been hidden at the organizer's request. I suppose that's to keep constituents from publicly questioning their representatives about where their loyalties lie and ruining a good time.

A big private conversation piece this year will most likely be whether the AIPAC's own spies, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, both former lobbyists, will finally get their day in court or the charges be dismissed in the name of 'national security.'

Other whispered topics may include whether or when to bomb Iran and how to derail a 'one-state' or 'two-state' solution for the Palestinians.

A gala kosher banquet is scheduled where Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-IL), Republican Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ), House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) join hundreds of their congressional colleagues, foreign dignitaries and activists from across the country in celebrating the U.S.-Israel alliance. Other 'notable' speakers at the conference will include Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, James Woolsey, former CIA director and Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Maj. Gen. Ido Nechustan, commander of the Israeli Air Force, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and of course Senator John Kerry (D-MA), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

This list of 'dignitary' speakers show that being bought and blackmailed by Israel is truly a bi-partisan effort. The list of Pro-Israel PAC contributions to congressional candidates is extensive, a 'leave no congressperson behind' money trail.

A Shabbaton is also scheduled, including both Jews and Shabbat goys. Only $150 per person. Tax deductible.

The last but not least thing on the agenda is Lobbying (At the Convention Center and on Capitol Hill). The untold billions given to Israel each year must be reinforced.

No word of any protests against the AIPAC crowd this year. I wonder why Glenn Beck and Hannity haven't organized anything? I thought eliminating wasteful spending was what they were all about.

NSA wiretapping of the event is said to be optional, but all is fair in love, war and Israeli control of Congress.

Treason Fest™..... a uniquely American affair.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Gore lies to Congress about personal finances

Al Gore once again exposed as disingenuous fraud

From Green Hell Blog

When Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn confronted Al Gore with his profiteering from global warming legislation at today’s House Energy and Environment Subcommittee hearing on the Waxman-Markey climate bill, Al Gore said that every penny he ever made from his business activities went into non-profit efforts. [See transcript below.]

That is a flat-out lie, according to this March 6, 2008 Bloomberg report that indicates that Al Gore invested $35 million of his own money in various for-profit endeavors.

Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore left the White House seven years ago with less than $2 million in assets, including a Virginia home and the family farm in Tennessee. Now he’s making enough to put $35 million in hedge funds and other private partnerships.

Gore invested the money with Capricorn Investment Group LLC, a Palo Alto, California, firm that selects the private funds for clients and invests in makers of environmentally friendly products, according to a Feb. 1 securities filing. Capricorn was founded by billionaire Jeffrey Skoll, former president of EBay Inc. and an executive producer of Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary film on global warming.

Kudos to Rep. Blackburn for asking one of the “10 Questions for Al Gore” and exposing Gore as the fundamentally dishonest operator that he is.

Here’s the transcript from the April 24, 2009 exchange between Al Gore and Rep. Blackburn. Note that not only does Al Gore lie to Rep. Blackburn, he tries to turn the tables by implicitly accusing her of being anti-business.

Rep. Blackburn: …You talked a little about [that] people have to have trust in what you’re doing and I think you know that this bill is going to fundamentally change the way America works and it’s going to effect families. We’ve all talked about how it affects individuals and what it’s going to do to their budgets and… ah… what it’s going to do to jobs in this country. And given the magnitude of those changes, I think it’s really important that no suspicion or shadow fall on the foremost advocates of climate change legislation. So I wanted to give you the opportunity to kind of clear the air about your motives and to set the record straight about your motives for some of your former constituents. And I’ve got an article from [the] October 8 [2008] New York Times Magazine about a firm called Kleiner Perkins… a capital firm called Kleiner Perkins. Are you aware of that company?

Al Gore: Well, yes. I’m a partner at Kleiner Perkins.

Rep. Blackburn: So you’re a partner in Kleiner Perkins. OK. Now they have invested about a billion dollars in 40 companies that are going to benefit from cap-and-trade legislation. So is the legislation that we are discussing here today, is that something that you are going to personally benefit from?

Al Gore: [Sigh]… I believe that the transition to a green economy is good for our economy and good for all of us. And I have invested in it. But every penny that I have made, I have put right into a nonprofit, the Alliance for Climate Protection, to spread awareness of why we have to take on this challenge. And, Congresswoman, if you’re… if you believe that the reason I have been working on this issue for 30 years is because of greed, you don’t know me.

Rep. Blackburn: No, sir, I’m not making accusations. I’m asking questions that have been asked of me. And individuals… constituents… that were seeking a point of clarity. So I am asking…

Al Gore: I understand exactly what you’re doing Congresswoman. Everybody here does.

Rep. Blackburn: Well, are you willing to divest yourself of any profit. Does all of it go to a not-for-profit. Is it an education not-for-profit?

Al Gore: Every penny that I have made has gone to it. Every penny from the movie, the book… uh… from any investments from renewable energy. I’ve been willing to put my money where my mouth is. Do you think there is something wrong with being active in business in this country?

Rep. Blackburn: I am simply asking for clarification on the relationship.

Al Gore: I’m proud of it. I’m proud of it.

Rep. Blackburn: Thank you and I appreciate the answer…


Also see: Report: Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing

& The Green Agenda


Steve Dore

84 Cosponsors for HR 1207!!

Text of HR 1207

Stop Inflation: Participate in "End the Fed"!

Who Owns The Federal Reserve

Chart of who "owns" the Federal Reserve

Friday, April 24, 2009

I can hardly wait

Here comes another diversion.

Pentagon To release New Images Of Prisoner Abuse

Friday, 24 April 2009

RL) -- The Obama administration has agreed to release dozens of photographs depicting alleged past abuses of detainees at U.S. prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The agreement follows a legal suit filed in 2004 by a prominent human rights group, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), requesting the government release 42 photos or demonstrate reasons for not doing so.

The ACLU said on April 23 that the court considering the case has received a letter from the Justice Department agreeing to the request.

According to the ACLU, the photos will be made available by May 28 and include not just the original 42 requested but a "substantial number" of other images.

The photos, taken between 2001 and 2006, are reported not to be as shocking as those taken of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in 2003. Leaks of those photos to the media created public outrage around the world and brought widespread criticism of Washington's handling of the war on terror.

But some of the new photos -- which show alleged abuses at prisons other than Abu Ghraib -- are reported to depict U.S. service members intimidating or threatening detainees by pointing weapons at them.

Amrit Singh, a lawyer for the ACLU, told U.S. media that the photos will "constitute visual proof that, unlike the Bush administration's claim, the abuse was not confined to Abu Ghraib and was not aberrational."

After the leak of the Abu Ghraib photos , the Bush administration said that the service members involved in the scandal were acting independently of higher authority. {more}

Let's hear another few weeks of debate in the controlled media about how torture saved Los Angeles. What led us to torture? The false flag of 9/11 and the lies of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Where's the release of the documents related to these crimes?

The sickness of torture can't compare to killing your own and over a million foreigners for profit and land and resource theft. The same psychopaths who ordered torture are still on the loose and using every tool at their disposal to keep the public distracted.

Obama and his minions and masters continue the cover up with feigned indignation.

Obama calls out Holocaust deniers


Obama pledges to confront Holocaust deniers

WASHINGTON (AFP) — At a ceremony Thursday remembering millions of Jews slaughtered in World War II, President Barack Obama reaffirmed the strong US bond with Israel and vowed to confront Holocaust deniers.

"There are those who insist the Holocaust never happened, who perpetrate every form of intolerance -- racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, xenophobia, sexism and more," Obama told a gathering in the Capitol Rotunda organized by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

"We have an opportunity and an obligation to confront these scourges," Obama said.

"We have the opportunity ... to commit ourselves to resisting injustice, intolerance and indifference in whatever forms they may take, whether confronting those who tells lies about history or doing everything we can to prevent and end atrocities like those that took place in Rwanda, those taking place in Darfur," he said.

The US president's speech came just days after a UN conference on racism where Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denounced Israel as "the most cruel and repressive racist regime."

Obama reaffirmed the "strong and enduring" bonds between the United States and Israel.

"The nation of Israel rising from the destruction of the Holocaust" was a source of hope to all those who commit to fighting intolerance, he said.

Among those at the gathering, which was part of the US Holocaust Museum's Days of Remembrance, were five Poles who between them saved the lives of scores of Jews and have been awarded the title of Righteous among the Nations by the Holocaust remembrance organization, Yad Vashem.

Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel, who survived the Nazi death camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald, used his time at the podium in the Rotunda to take on Ahmadinejad.

The Iranian leader was "the number one Holocaust denier in the world," said Wiesel, whose mother and sister died at Auschwitz, his father at Buchenwald.

"He used the solemn setting of a United Nations gathering again to insult the state of Israel in a way that no civilized person should ever do," he said, thanking the United States for boycotting the UN meeting in Geneva. {more AFP}

The players all come together. Did we do good master?

President Obama applauded Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel during the Holocaust remembrance ceremony yesterday.

President Obama applauded Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel during the Holocaust remembrance ceremony yesterday. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (L) listens during the Holocaust Days of Remembrance Ceremony

US Senator Joseph Lieberman (C-rear) looks on as Etta Katz lights a memorial candle

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Re-fighting Gettysburg
"Of course overweight people are a major contributor to 'global warming.' But my carbon credits offset my fat as they go to support some skinny kid in Somalia hand digging holes for toxic waste."

Al Gore Declares War

Al Gore suggests that climate change is akin to one of the bloodier wars in American history:

To drive home his point during Monday’s speech at the War Memorial Opera House in San Francisco, Gore compared 2009 to the Battle of Gettysburg that helped change the course of the Civil War.

“We are radically changing the relationship between the human species and the rest of the Earth,” he said. “This year, 2009, is the Gettysburg for the environment. It is the time we have the opportunity to change.”

Gore uses Earth Day to solicit political fund

(CNN) - Former Vice President Al Gore used Earth Day to criticize congressional Republicans for opposing President Obama's agenda, and he called on donors to give to House Democrats as a way to help expand their majority in the 2010 elections.

Gore, the most high profile spokesperson on the danger of global warming, specifically mentions this issue in the letter sent Wednesday to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) e-mail list.

"I can tell you that President Obama has signaled in the strongest possible terms that he intends to take bold steps and harness innovative resources to solve the climate crisis," Gore wrote in the letter. "Not only that, but Speaker Pelosi has said she will personally shepherd climate legislation through.

Gore is scheduled to {commit perjury...oops} testify Friday before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on "The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009."

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Video exposes ‘all whites are racist’ teachings

In 2007, the University of Delaware's Office of Residence Life used mandatory activities to coerce students to change their thoughts, values, attitudes, beliefs, and habits to conform to a highly specified social, environmental, and political agenda. Following FIRE's campaign, which called the attention of the national media and the blogosphere to the Orwellian program, university President Patrick Harker terminated the program, effective immediately. This video explains the program's invasive thought-reform activities, the horrified reactions of students and the press, and FIRE's response.

My Comments:

Believe it or not, this Marxist, racist ideology is being taught on campuses all across the United States. No longer are colleges and universities places of learning, but centers of social engineering and mass indoctrination aimed at breaking individuals of their traditional beliefs and instilling the state-mandated beliefs deemed acceptable by the elite. It's all about getting people to accept a socialist one world government, where the only opinions one will be allowed to have are those deemed "politically correct," which are pre-approved by the state. It's a form a training that derives directly from the Soviet system of government. The war that is being waged is, more than anything, being waged against free and individual thought.


Think What We Think...Or Else: Thought Control on the American Campus

Source: Matthew Jarvie

"It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude."

-- Aldous Huxley (1962 speech at Berkeley)

The 9/11 Card Trumps Everything "Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 - it's the threat against Israel."

Philip Zelikow, Director of the 9/11 Commission and Bush administration official.


by Scott Creighton

Prosecution for torture? Is that what you think is going to happen? A real investigation? What, like the 9/11 Commission or the NIST report maybe? Grow up. You may in fact get Jay Bybee impeached after distracting the accountability movement for a year or two till the next election cycle but what is the overall end result of that? Is that going to keep future presidents in line? Restore our shared respect for the trampled constitution? Hell no. After much ado about nothing and way to much wasted distracted time, the leaders of the “accountability movement” will pat themselves on the back like they accomplished something, Bybee will be removed from the bench, and then he will take a cushy seat as a director on a couple of well financed boards and effectively retire a very wealthy man sipping cocktails at a bar on the beach somewhere, laughing.

Because the prosecution movement is a joke; they can’t even manage to get 6 BushCo underlings brought up on charges in Spain. Spain. (Like anyone is going there anytime soon). It’s just a symbolic gesture like the war crimes prosecution of Kissinger, but they can’t even get that much done after confessing to torturing people, the stories of Cheney’s “death squads”, and the illegal invasion and pilfering of Iraq and Afghanistan. Why? Because Obama™ won’t let them.

And why did I say, more than a year ago when Bugliosi was pushing for prosecution rather than impeachment, that the prosecution tactic would never work? Why? It’s simple really: because 9/11 trumps everything and even the “progressives”/New Dems are starting to parrot that meme now.

Right on cue.

As the call for prosecution grows ever louder in the dusty, underfunded halls of “progressive” blogs and liberal sites everywhere, so too does the obvious answer to all the ills of the Bush/Obama administration: 9/11.

9/11 is the ultimate “get out of jail free card”, the gift that keeps on giving to BushCo/ Obama™ and their supporting cast of greedy corporations and all I have to do is cite 2 examples to prove my case.

Obama’s own intelligence director starts us off showing the previous administration that once again, they can count on Team Obama to carry their water, through thick and thin.

High value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qa’ida organization that was attacking this country,” Adm. Dennis C. Blair, the intelligence director, wrote in a memo to his staff last Thursday. MSNBC

Attacking this country, huh? Well, I guess that is a reference to 9/11 I suppose coming from Obama’s people, not Cheney. But then Blair goes even further;

I like to think I would not have approved those methods in the past,” he wrote, “but I do not fault those who made the decisions at that time, and I will absolutely defend those who carried out the interrogations within the orders they were given.” MSNBC

Yeah, you can’t blame them for what they did, after all, it was right after… 9/11

You see the closer you get to peeling away the veneer of justice in this country, especially around the subject of what happened during that time, the more the apologists are going to start sounding like Rudy Giuliani running for office; “a noun, a verb, and 9/11″.

And it is going to be bipartisan, which means that the DLC/New Dem think-tank mouth-pieces like Think Progress and MoveOn will parrot the same talking points in order to support the Grand Leader’s position.

But it won’t always be so obvious. Not like Cheney coming out there pretending like there was a new terrorist plot every other Tuesday that the torture foiled. Sure there will be those downright lies to justify their actions, but the more dangerous memes will be carefully disguised.

Take for instance this little gem that made it’s way onto one of the “accountability” seeking sites;

Having been the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, I’m aware of what some of these captives did. The Commission wondered how captives were questioned (for details on that, see this previously disclosed report), and the matter is now the subject of a federal criminal investigation by special prosecutor John Durham. Nonetheless, the evidence against most — if not all — of the high-value detainees remains damning. But the issue is not about who or what they are. It is about who or what we are.” ADS

This is Philip Zelikow, a lying scumbag who steered the 9/11 Commission for the Bush administration after George W’s first choice, Henry Kissinger was shamed into resigning by the family members of the victims of 9/11. He personally lead the cover-up of what happened on 9/11. Now, let’s hold that thought for just a second… Philip Zelikow orchestrated what is almost unanimously considered as a massive cover-up of an event that took the lives of nearly 3,000 U.S. citizens in one day on U.S. soil. The biggest “terrorist” event in our history… and Zelikow helped white-wash it so that no-one was to blame, actual eye-witness testimony was omitted, State Department and Pentagon officials actually gave fraudulent testimony, all this and this guy wraps it up in a neat little package to say “the terrorists did it” just like BushCo wanted them to.

And now he is making sure to say it all over again. “Nonetheless the evidence against most is damning”. Evidence? You mean the planted last will and testament that the hijacker for some reason wanted to take on the plane with him to blow up and the convenient instruction manual on how to fly jumbo jets… all that stuff they just happened to find in his suit case.. the one and only suitcase that didn’t make the transfer? You mean that evidence? Or does he mean the 6 hijackers that even the FBI says are probably still alive yet they refuse to change the names of the suspected 19? Maybe he is talking about the fact that Building 7 just fell over that day, crumbling just like a perfect example of controlled demolition, yet somehow Zelikow didn’t even mention it in his Commission Report.

Or does he mean the “evidence” that they got from the torture? 183 hours of waterboarding alone in one month. That kind of torture. You know, the evidence that they couldn’t see the video tape of… they couldn’t talk to the people who did the interrogating… they couldn’t watch the interrogation live… what they got was a written transcript of the confession.

Let me repeat that for those of you that are a little slow.

The great “evidence” that Zelikow is talking about (after dismissing eyewitness accounts, key whistle blowers who came forward at the time to testify, and failing to run even rudimentary forensic testing on the materials at ground zero) the “evidence” that Zelikow is talking about… is what SOMEONE SAYS… the suspect said.

No recordings, no videos… just the CIA agents WORD that someone confessed. The same agents, by the way, that committed multiple felonies when they destroyed the tapes of the interrogations; the REAL evidence.

That’s what amounts to solid evidence in Zelikows mind.

Now, though Zelikow seems to be stating that he is opposed to letting these guys off the hook and going forward with prosecution (though he conveniently doesn’t ever come out and actually say that) what he is doing in fact, is setting the precedent for the “9/11 made me do it” excuse. He is attempting to dehumanize the victims of the torture by injecting the crime of 9/11 as to poison the well, so to speak.

But in fact, these aren’t the only two people to have been tortured. I seem to remember a little story about abu Ghraib with bunches of people who turned out to be completely innocent and another one about a taxi driver who got caught up in all this as well, and he was dead within 5 days.

Not to mention Gitmo.

Fact is, Zelikow is doing exactly what I would expect from someone like him. He is taking a position that seems to be on the pro-prosecution side so that his writing will be republished in all the “progressive” sites, while his real message will be to repeatedly instill the connection between torture and 9/11.

And After Downing Street fell for it. I am sure others will as well. Why shouldn’t they? They know about as much about 9/11 as they know about what the Council on Foreign Relations and the Tri-Lateral Group really do. This is the trouble with having ignored the taboo subjects for years on end.

The fact is, nothing will ever be able to stick to any of these people as long as the myth of the official story of 9/11 is allowed to stand unchallenged in the mainstream “progressive” dissent community.

Should that be the case? Of course not; one atrocity does not justify the next. But we have to live in the real world here. Those who protect the gains of the imperialist agenda and feed off the continued ignorance of the masses, will constantly interject the story of 9/11 whenever they feel threatened; whenever someone gets close to holding any of them accountable or when they threaten to start any real investigation into the events surrounding all of this. That includes investigations into illegal wiretaps, graft and embezzlement, and especially 9/11.

And yes, that also includes another very important part of the machinery of imperialism that the new president doesn’t want us looking too closely at; torture.

You would think that people would start to see a pattern developing here.

No, you’re not going to get a legitimate prosecution for torture. Obama rushed right over to the CIA to make sure to tell them that himself. I guess he was worried about ending up like JFK if he didn’t get there fast enough, after all, the Bush’s are still around aren’t they?

What you will probably end up getting is another non-partisan Commission to investigate like Zelikow’s did. You’ll have Jane Harmon or some such “unbiased” forthright congressman take the lead on it and they will, after much more ado about nothing, present some findings some silly hearings with the Code Pink ladies standing behind some guilty looking CIA agent who will never see the inside of a jail cell for one single day before he is given a new face and identity and whisked off to enjoy the rest of his life sitting at a bar on a beach and laughing while the Clinton/Bush/Obama train rolls on it’s merry globalist way.

That’s what you’ll get.

Because in the end, Jane Harmon, or some other such “honorable” congressman will surmise that though we wouldn’t do it the same way now after all this “CHANGE”, all’s fair in love and war… and after all, we didn’t start it, they did, the “terrorists” did… on 9/11.

UPDATE 1 - Philip Zelikow was on the Rachel Maddow show last night** it seems, making the rounds on the “progressive” media just like I said he would with his bullshit little “dissenting memo”. Maddow rightly presses him (not nearly enough though) about the fact that if he did in fact write the memo at that time (hard to prove because as he says, all the official copies of it were “destroyed” so that there are no verifiable copies from White House records… we just have to take his “word” for it. Taking the word of a guy who oversaw the biggest whitewash in U.S. history is a bit of a reach for me) and was attempting to change White House policy on the torture issue, why didn’t he resign and go public then, in 2005. Zelikow kinda stumbled a bit on that one, but then launched into some drivel about how they actually were successful in changing the policy in 2006; as if to say they stopped torturing at that point with the “help” of congress and the Supreme Court (way I remember it, they fought tooth and nail to keep torturing everyone they could).

Zelikow also made a remarkable statement that went unchallenged by Maddow which was very disappointing to me. He said that this was a “unprecedented position” for the CIA and the White House in that they had never considered using torture before.

Zelikow is a hard-core liar.

The CIA has been torturing people all across the globe for decades. Practically since it’s inception; and they have always known it was illegal and immoral which is why they have always done their best to lie about it and cover it up. For God’s sake, the School of the Americas is an institution in Ft. Benning, GA. that teaches torture tactics to right wing “revolutionaries” from all over Latin America.

It’s been there since 1984, for Gods sake. Where I expect Zelikow to lie every time he opens his mouth, I would like to have seen Maddow call him out on that one.

But rather than do that, she told him his “perspective” on the matter was invaluable. “Progressives” really aren’t that gullable, are they?

Source: American Everyman

**Instead of being imprisoned for life for his crimes and cover-ups, Zelikow gets face time in the MSM to continue his lies. Torture is a minor issue compared to the false flag of 9/11 and Zelikow has always been right in the middle the deception.

Philip Zelikow, the Commission’s executive director and its gatekeeper, is rife with conflicts of interest.

An historian, he was a member of the Bush’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. Ret. Gen. Brent Scrowcroft, National Security Advisor in the Ford and Bush 1 administrations and vice chair of Kissinger Associates from 1980-89, chaired the Board.

Zelikow worked with Rice on the National Security Council during Bush 1. After that, they collaborated on a book.

Zelikow was on the Bush-Cheney transition team which helped form the current National Security Council.

The joke going around Washington: "Did he interview himself about his own role in the failures that left us defenseless?"

During the Commission hearings in January, Zelikov reported that the FBI and CIA neglected to tell the airlines to put alleged hijackers who had entered the U.S. on a watch list. He called the situation a “management problem.” When Commissioner Bob Kerrey disagreed with Zelikow, victim families at the hearings applauded. {more}

103 Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators Bush

The Unspeakable Truth About 9/11

9/11 For the Record: Naming Names

American / Israeli Dual Citizens in the US Government

The 2009 Food 'Safety' Bills Harmonize Agribusiness Practices in Service of Corporate Global Governance

Abandoned small farms, total management of the food supply and seed, control of nutrients and further entrenchment of the pharmaceutical and corporate farming industries is the goal of certain elements influencing legislation now before Congress. It's another criminal end around to destroy the rights of individuals and undermine the health of the nation.

Nicole Johnson presents a concise evaluation of the individuals and corporations involved.

Read it here.

Monday, April 20, 2009

Traitor of the Day “This conversation doesn’t exist.”

The Major Scandal Erupts Involving Rep. Jane Harman, Alberto Gonzales and AIPAC story doesn't come as a surprise. What else would you expect from a dual American/Israeli citizen and wealthy Jewish congresswoman? That she would actually put US interests ahead of Israel?

It's just business as usual for the AIPAC crowd.

That the NSA would be legally wiretapping an Israeli agent, catching a member of Congress in a crime and then let it become news over 3 years later has an unusual smell about it. I suspect there is more to the story than this first taste.

Investigation, indictments, trial and punishment are certainly called for in this case. But you know what, if investigations dug deep into the interactions of all of Congress, the Obama and Bush administrations, AIPAC and other Israeli lobbyists, there would be a judicial circus for years to come as most of these people are traitors.
Treason was specifically defined in the United States Constitution, the only crime so defined. Article III Section 3 delineates treason as follows: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

The United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "whoever is guilty of treason shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
To think that Homeland Security is spinning about the common citizen being a 'domestic terrorist' while right in the midst of our capital is a nest of traitors living the big life is a traitorous ploy in itself.

How long will we let foreign interests and criminals control our national policies?

For as long as 'Israel-Firsters' are allowed to be our politicians.

As James Edwards points out.
The story is “radioactive”. Meaning that everyone is afraid to talk about it, because everyone knows that Jews are always doing this kind of stuff to America, and if you point it out, your career will be destroyed. Only idiots accuse American Jews of dual loyalty. They’re loyal to Israel only.