Wednesday, May 27, 2009

The Premise

I'm looking at all major decisions, appointments and laws made by the Obama administration and Congress from the premise that anything they do is not in the best interests of the American people. A premise that did not begin with Obama but is a continuation of the ruling bodies and their actions in modern times since at least the formation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 with only a few exceptions. The appointment of Sonia Sotomayor for the supreme court is not an exception, it reinforces the rule.

http://cmsimg.tennessean.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Avis=DN&Dato=20090527&Kategori=NEWS03&Lopenr=905270418&Ref=TS&NewTbl=1&MaxW=280&Border=0
A "court of appeals is where policy is made." {see video}


Would that making of policy include a reinterpretation of the 2nd amendment?
Sonia Sotomayor versus the Second Amendment


from Damon Root

Equally troubling is Sotomayor's record on the Second Amendment. This past January, the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Maloney v. Cuomo, which Sotomayor joined, ruling that the Second Amendment does not apply against state and local governments. At issue was a New York ban on various weapons, including nunchucks. After last year's District of Columbia v. Heller, which struck down DC's handgun ban, attention turned to whether state and local gun control laws might violate the Second Amendment as well.

"It is settled law," Sotomayor and the Second Circuit held, "that the Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal government seeks to impose on this right." But contrast that with the Ninth Circuit's decision last month in Nordyke v. King, which reached a very different conclusion, one that matches the Second Amendment's text, original meaning, and history:

We therefore conclude that the right to keep and bear arms is "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition." Colonial revolutionaries, the Founders, and a host of commentators and lawmakers living during the first one hundred years of the Republic all insisted on the fundamental nature of the right. It has long been regarded as the "true palladium of liberty." Colonists relied on it to assert and to win their independence, and the victorious Union sought to prevent a recalcitrant South from abridging it less than a century later. The crucial role this deeply rooted right has played in our birth and history compels us to recognize that it is indeed fundamental, that it is necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited. We are therefore persuaded that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment and applies it against the states and local governments.

This split between the two circuits means that the Supreme Court is almost certain to take up the question in the near future. What role might soon-to-be Justice Sotomayor play? As gun rights scholar and Independence Institute Research Director Dave Kopel told me via email, Sotomayor's opinions "demonstrate a profound hostility to Second Amendment rights. If we follow Senator Obama's principle that Senators should vote against judges whose views on legal issues are harmful, then it is hard to see how someone who supports Second Amendment rights could vote to confirm Sonia Sotomayor."

As a respected jurist with an impressive legal resume, Sotomayor appears just as qualified to sit on the Supreme Court as any recent nominee. But from the standpoint of individual liberty and limited constitutional government, there are significant reasons to be wary of her nomination. {more}
Any "misinterpretation" of the constitution on 2nd amendment rights shows she is not qualified.


In the forward to "The International Judge," Sotomayor makes another statement on 'interpreting' our constitution.
"The question of how much we have to learn from the international community when interpreting our constitution is not the only one worth posing."

I don't like that 'opinion.' It's not in our best interests.

4 comments:

  1. Anytime someone starts talking about only a militia can keep and bear arms, ask them how the word "people," which is in the 1st Amendment, differs from the word people in the 2nd Amendment... and the 4th.

    Then watch them spit and sputter trying to explain that.

    The Founding Fathers put Free Speech and Freedom of the Press #1, then the right to keep and bear arms at #2.

    I don't think it was a coincidence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sotomayor's Jewish ties By RON KAMPEAS / JTA

    Jewish groups don't endorse US Supreme Court nominees, at least in writing.

    The tears and choked sobs when Sonia Sotomayor accepted President Obama's nomination on Tuesday told another story.
    Packed into the room along with Sotomayor's family, friends and colleagues were representatives of Jewish groups that have consulted with the White House about prospective replacements for David Souter.

    The story of her life - the daughter of a Puerto Rican single mother from the Bronx, NY, whose ambitions knew no bounds - resounded with a community that has made the story of immigrant triumph over struggle a template of Jewish American success.

    "It was impossible not to moved by her personal story," said Mark Pelavin, the associate director of the Reform movement's Religious Action Center. "To see her mother sitting there and think about what this says about her and her country - the combination of someone who grew up in a housing project, who has been on the bench for a long time, but who has been a prosecutor as well, that combination is very powerful."

    "It was thrilling," said Sammie Moshenberg, the Washington director of the National Council of Jewish Women.

    It doesn't hurt that Sotomayor, 54, is a poster child for strong Jewish-Hispanic relations. In 1986, when she was in private legal practice, she joined one of the first young leadership tours of Israel sponsored by Project Interchange, which is affiliated with the American Jewish Committee.

    Sotomayor so enjoyed the country - its immigrant culture, its popular music influenced heavily by Jewish immigrants from Argentina and Brazil - that she made a return visit in 1996 when she was a federal judge, and recently joined a Project Interchange US-Israel forum on immigration. In the process, she formed a lifelong friendship with Project Interchange founder Debbie Berger and her husband, Paul, who attended her swearing-in as a Manhattan appeals court judge in 1998.

    Leaders of the Anti-Defamation League issued a statement calling for a process that is conducted "professionally, and with civility and respect," and praised the pick while stopping short of an official endorsement.

    "We applaud President Obama for having selected this noted jurist to be the Court's first Hispanic and third woman Justice," the ADL leaders stated. "If confirmed, she will undoubtedly bring an important new perspective to the work of the Court."
    -------

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1243346494831&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

    She's liked by the ADL?

    Jesus H. Christ, why do I get a sinking feeling about Sonia?

    ReplyDelete
  3. i knew this had to be 'good for the jews' somehow. it was a little too much to have three jewish sc justices, so it had to be finessed some other way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The American Bar Association is reporting that Sotomayor is a member of La Raza.

    What I thought initially would be an easy confirmation now is getting hot.

    ReplyDelete