Wednesday, July 8, 2009

McFadden's Attempts to Abolish the Federal Reserve System

by Richard Cook

Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936): An American Hero - Dr. Ron Paul, the Republican candidate for the 2008 presidential nomination, is not the first U.S. politician to point to the abuses of the Federal Reserve System and call for its abolishment. Similar pleas to get rid of the Fed were made by Reps. Wright Patman (1893-1976) and Henry Gonzales (1916-2000), both Democratic congressmen from Texas and chairmen of the House Banking Committee.

Few recall, however, how controversial the Fed was when it was first proposed and then maneuvered through a recessing Congress just before Christmas 1913. Rep. Charles Lindbergh, Sr., R-MN and father of the future aviator, called the Federal Reserve Act “the worst legislative crime of the ages.”

Louis_T-McFaddenBut the strongest opposition came later, during the Great Depression. The source was Rep. Louis T. McFadden, a Republican representative from Pennsylvania who, as a former bank cashier and president, knew the financial system intimately.

McFadden was born in Granville Center, Bradford County, Pennsylvania, on July 25, 1876, just three weeks after the nation celebrated its centennial at the Philadelphia Exposition. He graduated from Warner's Commercial College in Elmira, New York, and went to work at the First National Bank of Canton, PA, in 1892.

McFadden was elected to Congress in 1914 and served until 1934. Though a Republican, he moved to impeach President Herbert Hoover in 1932 and introduced a resolution to bring conspiracy charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.

He also made a 25-minute speech on the House floor accusing the Federal Reserve of deliberately causing the Depression. At the time, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board was Eugene Meyer, who resigned after Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as president in 1933 and purchased the Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction.

Later in 1933, McFadden introduced House Resolution No. 158, Articles of Impeachment for the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant Secretaries of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the officers and directors of its twelve regional banks. This was McFadden's political swan song. In the election of 1934, he lost his reelection bid to a Democrat by 561 votes.

Let's fast forward to 2008. We are in the early stages of an economic collapse that Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at the NYU Stern School of Business, calls “the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.”

Once again the Federal Reserve is implicated, this time for having enabled the creation of gigantic investment bubbles in home mortgages, commercial real estate, equity funds, hedge funds, and derivatives that are now bursting. Mayhem is now starting to be sown within the producing economy of working men and women after having wreaked devastation on Wall Street and within the banking industry despite massive Federal Reserve bailouts over the past year.

greenspan-smilingThe chief culprit would appear to be Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, who presided not only over the ongoing subprime mortgage fiasco, but previously over the bubble of the 1990s. This blew up when the stock market crashed in 2000-2001, obliterating $6 trillion of investor wealth.

The subprime conflagration of the 2000s was ignited by an orgy of application fraud that commenced just after George W. Bush became president. According to former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, the investigation of this fraud by state attorneys-general was blocked by Bush's Treasury Department.

Perhaps Louis T. McFadden was onto something. After his premature death, his words faded into history as he was derided for being anti-Semitic when he said such things as, “America has to choose between God and the money changers who have unlawfully taken our gold and lawful money into their possession.” Today he is dismissed, sneeringly, as “one of the heroes of the Federal Reserve conspiracy theorists.” (Edward Flaherty,

But maybe McFadden said some things that are still worth listening to. In his June 10, 1932, address on the House floor, he declared, as reported in the Congressional Record:

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.”

Remember, this was a former bank president and member of the Republican Party speaking! McFadden added:

“From the Atlantic to the Pacific our country has been ravaged and laid waste by the evil practices of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks and the interests which control them ... This is an era of economic misery, and for the conditions that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable.”

Further statements by McFadden in his House speeches may be found at: becraft/mcfadden.html As we watch today with dismay while the U.S. dollar shrinks in value and foreign investors continue to buy huge quantities of federal government debt, we might recall McFadden's words from a 1934 speech:

“The Fed Note is essentially unsound. It is the worst currency and the most dangerous that this Country has ever known. When the proponents of the act saw that the Democratic doctrine would not permit them to let the proposed banks issue the new currency as bank notes, they should have stopped at that. They should not have foisted that kind of currency, namely, an asset currency, on the United States Government. They should not have made the Government [liable on the private] debts of individuals and corporations, and, least of all, on the private debts of foreigners.”

Of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, or corporations, McFadden said in words that also prefigured the life-and-death stranglehold the Fed has over every aspect of the U.S. economy today:

“The imperial power of elasticity of the public currency is wielded exclusively by the central Corporations owned by the banks [i.e., the regional Federal Reserve Banks.] This is a life and death power over all local banks and all business. It can be used to create or destroy prosperity, to ward off or cause stringencies and panics. By making money artificially scarce, interest rates throughout the Country can be arbitrarily raised and the bank tax on all business and cost of living increased for the profit of the banks owning these regional central banks, and without the slightest benefit to the people. The twelve Corporations together cover and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency and all public revenue of the United States. Not a dollar can be put into circulation among the people by their Government, without the consent of and on terms fixed by these twelve private money trusts.”

In language that suited the 1930s but is also prophetic of our own disjointed times, McFadden summarized his outrage by saying:

“Are you going to let these thieves get off scot free? Is there one law for the looter who drives up to the door of the United States Treasury in his limousine and another for the United States Veterans who are sleeping on the floor of a dilapidated house on the outskirts of Washington?”

McFadden may have paid with his life for his outspokenness. After he lost his congressional seat in 1934, he remained in the public eye as a vigorous opponent of the financial system; that is, until his sudden death on October 3, 1936, of a “dose” of “intestinal flue” after attending a banquet in New York City.

Reporting his death in its October 14 issue, Pelley's Weekly stated that it had “became known among his intimates that he had suffered two [previous] attacks against his life. The first attack came in the form of two revolver shots fired at him from ambush as he was alighting from a cab in front of one of the Capital hotels. Fortunately both shots missed him, the bullets burying themselves in the structure of the cab.”

Next, 'He became violently ill after partaking of food at a political banquet at Washington. His life was only saved from what was subsequently announced as a poisoning by the presence of a physician friend at the banquet, who at once procured a stomach pump and subjected the congressman to emergency treatment.'

Evidently the third time the assassins succeeded, and the most articulate critic of the Federal Reserve and the financiers' control of the nation was dead. He was 60 years old.

Source: Ziopedia


Auditing the Fed will Audit the State

Mises Daily by

If Ron Paul succeeds in getting the Fed audited, the consequences could be far-reaching. Assuming the audit isn't rigged to protect the guilty, as a similar bill was in 1978, the Fed will need every obfuscating Keynesian to testify and write editorials on its behalf, to reassure the public that monetary matters really are best left to the gods who rule us, such as Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner. Monetarists, too, would likely join the "Save the Fed" crusade, perhaps arguing that even a great free market economist like Milton Friedman considered the Fed useful for preventing and curing recessions.

But the really appetizing part of auditing the Fed is knowing what stands behind it. The Fed is a racket at heart, a con game writ large — what else can you call an organization with the exclusive privilege of printing money in the trillions and handing it over to friends? But if this is true, what does that say about the state, the organization that created and sanctions it? Is the Fed an honest mistake in the state's otherwise undying efforts to preserve our liberty, or might it be a key component of a bigger racket?

Without the power of the state, there would be no proposal to audit the Fed because there would be no Fed to audit. Like any cartel, it exists to protect its members from market retribution, and only the police power of the state can make us shoulder that burden. A bill to audit the Fed could by force of logic become a state audit, much like the investigations of the 1972 Watergate burglary exposed the grinning skull behind the government's public persona. During a Fed audit, for example, would it not be reasonable to ask why the people's elected representatives continue to support a banking system that secretly steals wealth from their countrymen and other dollar holders? Or are we to take the naïve position that most elected officials really are clueless about the Fed's policy of currency debasement and the effects such policies have had in history?

see the entire article at Mises


With treason as standard operating procedure in Congress, the odds of an honest audit of the Fed are slim.

Fed's Latest Thievery Now Sanctioned by Congress

Whew, that was close. The Fed's latest theft of nearly 13 TRILLION dollars is now officially signed off on by our quisling Congress, there will be NO pesky audit.
Wonder where all that money MADOFF to? Money that has disappeared, with the Fed refusing to disclose who got the money or what is what used for.

While we continue to hear tales of woe in the USA about more people losing their homes and jobs, in Israel, things are going nicely, with corrupt Arab dictators like the King of Saudi Arabia signing off on an Israeli strike against Iran and that pathetic clown Biden acting like a well trained circus monkey, gratefully swallowing massive amounts of Zio-Spooge and giving that Apartheid regime the OK to bomb the hell out of Iran.

Plus, thousands of new illegal settlements have been approved by the Zionists of Israel and their economy is doing nicely.

Must of had some money socked away for a rainy day, eh?

more: Greg Bacon at Goon Squad


  1. Ref:" the King of Saudi Arabia signing off on an Israeli strike against Iran and that pathetic clown Biden acting like a well trained circus monkey, gratefully swallowing massive amounts of Zio-Spooge and giving that Apartheid regime the OK to bomb the hell out of Iran."

    Some of us can recognize when something is out of kilter...
    I say similar stuff here:

  2. It's Simple, But Crucial, Matter Of Word-Choice, Comrades--Avoid Complexity--To Save Our Lives
    (Apollonian, 8 Jul 09)

    Note even kids understand COUNTERFEITING--it's a CONCRETE term easily visualized by the mind. But "banking" immediately mystifies the Fed, automatically making it incomprehensible to--about 95% of people, I'd say. See,, and for expo/ref. on Fed fraud.

    So it's simply this terminology problem we patriots need to work on, comrades.

    Note then CONCRETES are what we can pt. to--like a pencil, or a hat--which people can see, can directly perceive; there's little thinking, hence confusion, involved.

    Abstractions, on the other hand, are far more complicated IDEAS that require definitions--like the word, "capitalism"--imagine trying to give a comprehensive explanation to a little kiddo about such word, "capitalism."

    Remember the "Tower of Babel" story fm Old Testament?--we got it right now, people talking past each other so often. Use the word, "Fed," and very, very few understand it's counterfeiting. U need to be explicit comrades--u MUST BE EMPHATIC. Don't worry about being embarrassed--it just might save our lives.

    For when US Dollar finally collapses--any day now--don't doubt it's going to mean food-shortages and serious hunger, maybe even genuine starvation. People, poor creatures, are going to die.

    Poor people--so taken with big words and ABSTRACTIONS--like "capitalism," "inflation," etc., fascinated and mystified.

    Thus people suffer "information overload"--which keeps them fm stopping to think most seriously--even about the very simple words they use.

    So u see, our leaders and spokesmen MUST quit trying so much to be so intellectual--like Ron Paul ( These "leaders" must make more emphasis upon being concrete and stressing what the Fed really is--A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, pure and simple--COUNTERFEITING.

    Such terminological issue regarding concreteness then is simple part of Christian virtue of HONESTY in spirit of TRUTH against Jew lies, according to Gosp. JOHN. And remember comrades, that old story about the "battle lost for want of a horse-shoe." Same principle applies here regarding the Fed mystery.

    If patriots could only put enough energy and attention into it--it wouldn't take that much--imagine EVEN CHILDREN could then be enlisted for this simple informational process/campaign.

    CONCLUSION: And if and when our dear volk finally let it dawn upon them what Fed really is (counterfeiting, stupid)--THAT'S THE WHOLE BALL-GAME, comrades. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian