One problem is that there are too many stuck with the propagandized mentality that there is such a thing as 'the good war' as World War II was and is portrayed. Just as the current wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are portrayed by many non-critical thinking Americans as necessary, it is all a lie.
Rethinking the Good War.
On September 1, 1939 – 70 years ago – Germany attacked Poland and officially began World War II. Although over 50 million people died in the war – including 405,000 Americans – it is considered to be the Good War. The fact that most of deaths were on the Allied side (the "good" side), the majority of those killed were civilians, hundreds of millions were wounded – including 671,000 Americans – and/or made refugees, homeless, widows, or orphans, hundreds of billions of dollars worth of property was destroyed, hundreds of billions of dollars more were wasted on armaments, and untold millions underwent an incomprehensible amount of suffering, misery, and loss doesn’t seem to matter either. World War II is still universally recognized as the Good War.
How is it possible to make such a description of such carnage on a grand scale?
{read the rest by Laurence M. Vance}
Even the 'heroes' of World War II need to be reevaluated and their war crimes brought to light.
The War Crimes of Eisenhower and ZOG/USA
We could move a long way towards peace in the middle east just by doing one thing. Getting that done is difficult if not impossible in the current political climate.
"YES WE CAN" End US Aid to Israel
Some tend to think that the left is a sleeping giant that just needs to be nudged a little but many have their doubts including Cindy Sheehan.
The “restive anti-war movement” is planning “teach-ins” and “memorials” but not planning on surrounding the White House and demanding that their leader bring the troops home from all theaters of war and then threatening to withhold support if he doesn't. The “restive anti-war movement” will not do anything it thinks will compromise Democratic chances in the 2010 midterms.
I have two questions to ask of the “restive anti-war movement.”
1) How did the people of Iraq/Afghanistan lose value as human beings when the Democrats took over power in 2007?
2) How did the people of Pakistan lose their value as humans when Obama became president at the beginning of the year? {more}
The GOP has never met a war that they can't profit from and exploit and the Dems refuse to stand up to their war criminal 'messiah.'
Once again...if we can't stop these insane wars run by the psychopathic/sociopathic ruling elite, there will never be any social progress of any type worth mentioning.
Got that or has your spine been removed in a stealth body parts theft? A theft that's only to make money for a few.

The problem with Obama, as is the case with any other US president since Ike perhaps, is that he's been co-opted by the powers that be.
ReplyDeleteSure, the myth that anyone can be president in the US is nice, but the fact remains, if you want to become president, you had better join the beltway insiders' club and scratch some backs in the process.
There's a memorable scene in the movie Robbin Hood: Men in Tights.
Prince John: Such an unusual name, "Latrine." How did your family come by it?
Latrine: We changed it in the 9th century.
Prince John: You mean you changed it TO "Latrine"?
Latrine: Yeah. Used to be "Shithouse."
Prince John: It's a good change. That's a good change!
The Left/Democratic anti-war movement will come back with a fury after the 2010 mid-terms that put Republicans back in charge of the House.
ReplyDeleteI can almost hear the hufffing and puffing that will start erupting in January 2011.
That's over a year from now. A lot more will die in the meantime.
ReplyDeleteYou're not suggesting that the democrats only cry anti-war when it suit their purposes in these power plays, are you?
Why...if they did that, you might even call it treason...
"Treason never prospers. For if it prosper . . . none dare call it treason."
ReplyDelete