Sunday, October 4, 2009

Why Are We Unable To Resist?

by Christopher Bollyn

I often wonder why young Americans do nothing to protest the outrageous criminal regime that has taken control of the United States. Where is the resistance? Two illegal wars, a growing police state, and several trillion dollars stolen by criminal bankers from the American people in the past year alone -- why aren't they protesting, resisting - burning tires in the streets?

Having grown up during the Vietnam War, I was immersed in the protest movement and vibrant anti-war music and culture of the 1960s. "Lucky Man" by Emerson, Lake, and Palmer is a good example of the anti-war music of the time. I find it odd that there is no similar anti-war movement or music today. Faced with never-ending wars in the Middle East, today's youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical.During the years that I attended public school, the United States was engaged in an undeclared war of aggression in Southeast Asia that nobody really understood. Every week, the American people saw actual photos from the war in LIFE magazine and could easily see through the deception that we were fighting "communism". After 8 years of war in Afghanistan and 18 years in Iraq, however, there is no similar photo-journalism of comparable quality coming from the "embedded" journalists covering these wars. Likewise, there is virtually no anti-war music or protest movement against the criminal wars being fought in our name. Why?

We have to look at the media to understand the lack of a similar anti-war movement in the United States. Today, there is no mass resistance because the U.S. media is now completely owned and controlled by Zionist Jews who actually support the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the illegal wars being fought by the United States and its allies. These wars are being waged to benefit Israel and strengthen the Zionist hegemony in the Middle East and Central Asia. The Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States now works full time to promote the war agenda - first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran. In the Zionist-controlled media there is no room for any real criticism of the Zionist war agenda.

Paul Wolfowitz, one of the senior U.S. officials who conspired and planned the wars of aggression against both Afghanistan and Iraq, is now pushing for war against Iran in the pages of the Financial Times (U.K.), for example. It needs to be understood that Wolfowitz is guilty of the most serious war crime, "a crime against peace" as defined by the Nuremberg Principles. That his opinion is published in a leading financial paper illustrates my point that the mass media actively promotes the Zionist war agenda. Wolfowitz has strong connections to the state of Israel. He lived in Israel as a teenager when his Polish-born father, Jacob, worked at the Technion, and his sister, Laura, married an Israeli and lives in Jerusalem.

The controlled media today censors and sanitizes the images and information about the wars and the human suffering the aggression has caused to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. The public is kept in the dark about the true costs of the illegal wars, both human and financial. Most importantly, the U.S. media keeps powerful images like these from the Vietnam and Iraq wars off the pages of our newspapers.


The famous photo of Vietnamese children burned with napalm changed U.S. public opinion about the war.


The photo of a summary execution by a South Vietnamese police chief showed the lawlessness of the war.


The U.S. evacuates after the fall of Saigon

After nearly 19 years of fighting and bombing Iraqis, very few images of the human cost of the war have been published. The ones that have been seen are horrible beyond belief and reveal the criminal nature of the war of aggression.


A photo from the "Highway of Death" shows what happened to one of the thousands of retreating Iraqis who were incinerated by a U.S. gas-air MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) in 1991.


A U.S. Marine killing injured Iraqis in a mosque in Fallujah, November 13, 2004 (NBC/AP)

The Vietnam war was being fought, we were told, to keep Southeast Asia from falling to the communists. Thousands of young men, including several of my relatives, went to Vietnam to fight "communism". Many thousands of young Americans died in Viet Nam. An untold number of Vietnamese died.

Vietnam eventually did fall to the communists and the last U.S. personnel had to flee from the roof of the embassy in Saigon with desperate people being pushed off the over-crowded helicopters. Despite the fact that the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam, the world did not come to an end. As a matter of fact, nobody even seemed to notice. Most people were simply glad the 12-year old war was over.

I have often wondered why today's youth seem utterly unable to resist the blatant lies of the criminal government and controlled media, which are clearly extremely harmful to them and their nation. I can't understand why the young people in America and Europe abuse themselves with tattoos and body piercings. Don't they care about themselves? I have seen people with screws coming through their eyebrows that look like construction accidents that should be sent to the nearest emergency room.

Christopher J. Petherick, the former chief editor of the Spotlight and American Free Press, a weekly newspaper I wrote for in Washington, D.C., had an ugly metal stud sticking through his tongue that looked absolutely awful. I had never seen such a thing. He told me that he was a Satanist. I thought he was just an East Coast trendie. I sometimes told him that we were doing the Lord's work by spreading the Truth.


Christopher J. Petherick, a self-avowed Satanist, was the editor of American Free Press and the former Spotlight, publications of the Liberty Lobby of Washington, D.C. It makes no sense that a Satanist would be the chief editor of a newspaper that is purportedly written for patriotic Christian Americans, unless one understands that the Liberty Lobby is actually owned and controlled by a Zionist Jew named Mark Lane. The paper is a controlled opposition outlet that acts like flypaper to create a list of active patriots -- for the Jewish intelligence organization Lane works for.

Petherick fired me after a three-man team of heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me in front of my family, but only after collecting many thousands of dollars from readers for the Bollyn "legal defense fund," which were kept by the so-called employee owned newspaper. I later discovered that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane, and have been since the early 1990s when he bought the assets of Liberty Lobby with some of the $5 million he had been paid by Willis A. Carto in legal fees.

I learned this from L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics of Cincinnati. Patterson's newsletter is similar to the publications of the Mark Lane's Liberty Lobby, which is what led Lane to sue Patterson in the mid-1990s for some $10 million. Lane, a Zionist Jew, wanted to have a monopoly in the patriotic newspaper business. During the legal process Patterson learned that Lane had acquired the assets of the nearly bankrupt Liberty Lobby in the early 1990s. Manfred Roeder, a German patriot who has been imprisoned often in occupied Germany, told me that such controlled opposition newspapers like National Zeitung are designed to skim the cream off of the nationalist movement. They also serve as outlets of disinformation and have even more sinister purposes.


Jane Fonda and Mark Lane worked closely together in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War. Lane, who served in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany, owns the assets of Liberty Lobby and American Free Press.

As the U.S. prepared for war in Kuwait and Iraq in the summer of 1990, I began organizing pro-Palestinian students at the University of California at Santa Cruz who were opposed to the war effort. I learned a great deal through my anti-war efforts. I saw how the anti-war movement was taken over by Jewish students from the Hillel organization (B'nai B'rith). The issue of occupied Palestine was pushed to the side. This is what controlled opposition means: controlling both sides of the debate to control the message.

James B. Phillips, a devout Catholic and dear friend from Chicago who served in Vietnam, recently sent me a video from the mid-1980s that explains how Americans have been demoralized and why.


James B. Phillips, (top row, 3rd from left) commanded a U.S. rifle platoon in Viet Nam.

The information comes from a former agent of the Soviet K.G.B. who defected to the United States.

The former K.G.B. agents says: "Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him."

This is exactly the problem we face in 2009. Although Americans have the information that proves that their government has not been elected and is lying to them about 9-11 and everything else, the people do nothing to resist. They have become enslaved to lies. This video explains how this was done.

As the former Soviet journalist Yuri Bezmenov says in the video clip about the KGB's demoralization of American youth through the media, "Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage... in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American [so] that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country."

Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres. They have taken control of the media for one reason - to manipulate public opinion by controlling the message. It is the same with media as with pipelines: He who owns the pipeline controls the product.

Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization of Freemasons, the International Order of B'nai B'rith. Philip Morris Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international president of B'nai B'rith. The Sulzberger family who owns the New York Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B'nai B'rith, which was started in New York City in 1843. It is through this secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people while living among them.

The B'nai B'rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early 1900s. The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes. The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States. The B'nai B'rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States. Through their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of Zion of the B'nai B'rith are able to push their agenda into every community and college campus in America. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is certainly not a "hoary fake", and is most likely the protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B'nai B'rith.

Bezmenov's statement about the KGB being primarily occupied with disinformation and demoralization efforts aimed at Americans through the media is similar to the analysis by the German intelligence expert, Andreas von B├╝low, who told me that 90 percent of the work done by the CIA and other intelligence agencies is disinformation and deception.

It needs to be understood that communism and Zionism are fraternal twins from the same mother -- big Jewish capital of the Rothschild sort. This relationship can be seen in Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, the most senior advisers of President Barack Hussein Obama II. Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, and Axelrod, the son of Jewish communists, were commissioned in 1992 by the daughter of Jewish financier Philip Morris Klutznick of Chicago to make Obama our "first black president." Zionism and communism are two heads of the same evil beast.

Communism and Zionism emerged together in the Russian Empire in the late 1800s. There were six communist parties, two of which were also Zionist. Although the Rothschild family who created the state of Israel is capitalist, the Russian Jews who emigrated to Palestine in the late 1800s and early 1900s were ardent communists and socialists. Most of the Ashkenazi (Khazar and Slavic) Jews who built the Zionist state and who run it to this day come from the communist and Zionist parties that created the kibbutz and moshav settlements in Palestine. The Jews who were forced to emigrate to Palestine (later Israel) and the millions of people who have lived under communism are similar. Zionists and communists are both merely the pawns of the Rothschilds; foot soldiers for international Jewish bankers.

To be continued...

Source: Christopher Bollyn



6 comments:

  1. Re "today's youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical":

    Because they've been brainwashed into thinking "political activism = more sodomy and infanticide"

    ReplyDelete
  2. I bet if there is a draft they will care real quick. The elites know this too. I'd love to see the young marxists have to go and fight like our fathers and uncles and brothers had to in Viet Nam.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Americans Can Accept Nothing Less Than Full-Fledged Jew-Expulsion For Revolutionary Revival
    (Apollonian, 4 Oct 09)

    My own theory, regarding "demoralization," is same as "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler: HUBRIS sets in--people think they're God--they think they create reality, this by means of a PERFECTLY "free" will by which then they achieve "good."

    And this cultural hubris happens at the apex/zenith of a given culture's development and course of existence whence people imagine they've achieved "prosperity" and "happiness."

    Then poor folks begin indulging in guilt, and now it becomes competetive.

    The solution is, aside fm the weaklings dying out, the survivors adopting the correct course of DETERMINISM in accord w. absolute cause-effect, founded upon the objective (Aristotelian) reality--but of course, this doesn't guarantee the culture will survive or revive.

    But if we look at history, we see we have hope by means of Christian "awakening," including then above-noted philosophic adjustments, the culture reviving as Roman Empire in early 4th cent., by means of cleansing, refreshing Jew-expulsion. Anything less than Jew-expulsion presently will be just "business as usual"--which isn't so good for USA at moment. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fucking Bollyn starts writing a decent article and turns it into a scene slag halfway through, using teen piercings as segueway into diatribe against some group no-one has heard of... fuckn Bollyn... if you're going to write a scene slag, write a scene slag, don't fuck up a good article half-way through you idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The article Why Are We Unable To Resist? contains a smattering of truths. However, the author Christopher Bollyn has deceptively mixed in a number of blatant lies.

    Mark Lane is not a "Zionist". He represented the anti-Zionist Neturei Karta in Jerusalem, forcing Menachem Begin to release Rabbi Hirsch's son after he was captured by the IDF. In a 1985 trial, Lane successfully defended the anti-Zionist Liberty Lobby, overturning a $650,000 libel award from a 1981 suit filed by former CIA operative and Watergate burglar E. Howard Hunt.

    When "Holocaust survivor" Mel Mermelstein sued Liberty Lobby, Willis Carto, the Legion for the Survival of Freedom (through which the Institute of Historical Review functioned), and a law firm that had defended Liberty Lobby, for $11 million, Lane served as the defendants' lead attorney. In a 1991 trial, he successfully got the case dismissed.

    Mark Lane was associated with the late Haviv Schieber, former mayor of Ber Sheeba, Israel. Schieber became a well-known anti-Zionist, converted to Christianity, and is listed on the Zundelsite's Victims of Zion page.

    Mark Lane never owned or controlled Liberty Lobby, nor has he ever owned or controlled American Free Press.

    Bollyn contradicted himself on the Hender show when he said he "was told from the very beginning" that Lane "owns the paper, he took over the paper, he controls the paper..." Yet in the article, Bollyn writes that he "later discovered" - i.e., after he was fired by AFP - "that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane". And if Bollyn's talk show version of knowing "from the very beginning" (in 2000) that Lane "controls the paper" were correct, that would render absurd his October 2006 statement "I know very well that all decisions at AFP go through Willis Carto."

    In 2001, the operations of Liberty Lobby ended in Washington, DC. On August 2, 2002, all rights and assets of Liberty Lobby were assigned to the Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (LSF).

    In 1993, Willis Carto was ousted from the LSF and the IHR in an internal coup by Scientologist Thomas J. Marcellus, Mark Weber, Ted O'Keefe and Greg Raven. So in 2002, the Liberty Lobby assets went to the new IHR controllers, not to Mark Lane, who remained loyal to Carto.

    Bollyn's claim that American Free Press is a "flypaper operation" for providing the government and other forces with a list of names of patriots necessarily implies that Willis Carto and Mike Piper of AFP have been willingly serving as Zionist agents and government stooges for years. A look at their long record of publishing anti-Zionist material proves that they are not agents.

    Bollyn cites Lane's being in US army intelligence from 1945-1947 as 'evidence' of his being a bad guy. From 1983-1985, Bollyn was married to a woman who worked for Israeli military intelligence at Herzliya, who wanted to marry an American so she could live in the US. Bollyn had two theft convictions in 1981 out of California, as well as an assault charge. It is Bollyn, not Lane, Carto or Piper who publishes disinformation designed to sabotage 9/11 truth, such as "WTC had thermite disguised as UPS batteries" (to help "debunkers" claim molten iron was merely molten lead).

    Bollyn also lied about AFP having "kept" the money for his "legal defense fund". Some of the money was paid to Bollyn, which evidently was used not for legal defense, but to publish a children's book that Bollyn and his wife Helje had been working on. AFP sent letters to those who had sent in the remaining funds, asking whether they wanted the money returned or merged into the AFP general account. Some asked for the money to be returned, others told AFP to keep it.

    For further information, see:

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynhender.htm

    ...or Google "bollyn spins tall tales".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Poseidon, I suppose I should always add a disclaimer to Bollyn articles as I have in the past. The soap opera with him is continuous.

    I agree that there is a smattering of truths in his writings and that any disinfo needs to be brought out.

    Thanks for the link. I appreciate the feedback.

    ReplyDelete