Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Julian Assange of Wikileaks is a 9/11 conspiracy denier?

"I believe in facts about conspiracies," he {Julian Assage of Wikileaks} says, choosing his words slowly. "Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news." What about 9/11? "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." {more}

So what's really going on here with Julian? You might think having the scoop of the century about the secrets of 9/11 would be the ultimate Wikileaks goal. Or is there something deeper and possibly sinister in store for whistleblowers who could be ready to talk or release verifiable information? Is Wikileaks a limited hangout or even worse, a trap? Or is Assange just trying to keep himself safe by calling 9/11 a 'false conspiracy?'
He never stays in one place more than two nights. Is that because the CIA wants to kill him? "Is it in the CIA's interest to assassinate me? Maybe. But who would do it?" Isn't he brave to appear in public? "Courage is an intellectual mastery of fear," he says. "It's not that you don't have fear, you just manage your risks intelligently."


  1. WKILEAKS is a covert DOD/CIA operation wall to wall...

  2. I have never been able to figure out why these harbingers of the left deny 9/11 truth. Is it that they don't want to end up like Daniel Pearl or are they affraid of not being taken seriously.

  3. White Beast of WotanJuly 21, 2010 at 11:28 AM

    I leak on kikepedia with a mighty urine stream.

  4. Wikileaks was the one that got out that video showing US troops massacring civilians in Iraq, don't think "60 Minutes" would have, as they have been too busy lately promoting the Afghan war.

    The greatest danger is that we turn against one another, living like scared rabbits in the old USSR, always ready to turn on a friend or relative because we don't like what they said.

    We must not go down that path, because it leads to ultimate destruction.

    If a large majority of the people believed and knew that 9/11 was an inside job, would there even be an internet?

  5. Rufus the Space AgentJuly 21, 2010 at 6:33 PM

    Questioning 911 events will be a crime like questioning the holocaust. Let's enjoy the www while we can. A killswitch won't stop it we'll just go back to BBS and not even have html.

  6. Of course Wikileaks is a limited hangout.

    The whole point of a limited hangout is not to stop dissent or suppress opposition but to permit it, attract it, channel it and control it.

    Obviously, you need to have "scoops" that are sufficiently interesting to qualify as plausible opposition, yet represent no substantive threat.

    The "legitimate press" ensure Wikileaks has sufficient mind share. So GE, National Amusements, Pearson Group, Washington Post Company, Hearst Media, McGraw-Hill, all give plenty of coverage. It's very "Br'er Rabbit and the briar patch".

    The famous recent video of US soldiers doing their job, killing people, is the perfect example. It's visceral but inconsequential.

    Of course, you're not going to present anything of any material importance, but rather appeal to gut emotion in precisely the way that is so carefully studied by PR leviathans like WPP. In fact, a good slice of US military budget goes to PR firms.

    What you will not see, for instance, is perfectly public information on the financial aspects of 9/11: the implausible prescience of the likes of Veritas Capital and the Blackstone Group, and the various investment banks originally funding them (JPM, GS, Deutsche, CS, etc). Or the lack of any investigation into derivatives trades of the day. Or the very open planning in the Center for Strategic and International Studies, or the the Project for the New American Century. Or the execution by USSTRATCOM and various military contractors, in particular Northrop and Lockheed. Not to mention the inexplicable suppression of Washington air defences and laughable lacunae in NSA and NRO SIGINT/ELINT.

    The problem with the whole 911 episode is the utter, abject, blatant lack of any reasonable doubt about who was involved from the Joint Chiefs down, and who executed the operation, and the utter, abject, blatant absence of any credibility of the official cover story.

    The concentration of media made it far simpler to present and reinforce this absurd story. Murdoch, Zuckermann, Hearst, Redstone; they all know precisely what happened because they were closely involved from the outset.

    Competent intel functionaries worldwide are paid to understand reality and ignore PR: there are large amounts of money and power riding on it.

    When the planes hit, probably every single one of them immediately thought, "So they finally implemented Operation Northwoods. I was wondering how they'd get their feet into Iraq."

    What we are witnessing is an undeclared hot war by US/NATO forces against their greatest geostrategic competitors, Russia militarily and China economically.

    The 911 lie is the keystone that supports this whole ediface of lies.

    Destroy that and the rest fails catastrophically.

  7. anon @ 7:00pm, good take on this. Your last two lines sum it up for me and I would say for many others.

  8. Assange is a khazar "jew".
    If the C.I.A. were so concerned with apprehending him, how was he able to enter the U.S.A., the most overly security concious nation on Earth, outside occupied Palestine, and North Korea, without incident?
    He's not exactly nondescript!
    C'mon people.
    He's a jew!
    There's your clue!

    I see they chopped Incogman.

    May'be it's all a hologram.

    No comments???

    Cannibal Rabbi

  9. In case that link didn't work.
    Eight articles, scrolling down.

    Cannibal Rabbi.

  10. adventures of tech the wizardJuly 22, 2010 at 12:34 AM

    G.B. if it wasn't for port 80 and TCP/IP protocols would there even be an internet? Nope.

  11. Here's a for instance. Assange, the khazar "jew",poses as a crusader for the truth.Get's hold of some grisly footage of Americans killing, wherever they are killing people these days. Puts it on the net. It gets picked up by the American media, and given the old,"oh my God, what have we become?", treatment. The all-jew media, get to tut tut, and feign concern. This is the same jew media that cheer-led you into the war, the one before that, and the next one. They step back from it and judge Americans, for what in effect, was the result of their nefarious machinations, and plotting. You're left holding the bag, looking like a nation of psychopaths, while they point the finger saying,"look what bad things those terrible people have done".

    Would he do you think, have put the same sort of footage up from occupied Palestine? Do you think the all-jew msm would have? God knows there must be a fucking sea of it. We know how jews like to record their malevolent scams, like the five mossadniks on 9.1.1., to replay at a later date, and congratulate themselves on how clever they've been.
    Do you think that foppish ponce gives a crap about how the goyim suffer and die?

    Supposing the C.I.A. did arrest him? The tribe would be out in force in the media, decrying the authorities as big bullies trying to stop freedom of speech, and the free flow of info. A Pulitzer and a reputation as a martyr to the "man".
    That's all you need to know! Oh and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!

    Here's what he did to his own.

    Just looking and listening to him, it's clear he is a chancer.

    Jews aint American's, they're not French, they're not English.

    They are jews, all the time!
    Given what's come to light in recent years, only a babe in arms could put any trust in these scurrilous, ham actors.
    Don't say you haven't been warned.
    To jews, you and yours are less than the shit on their shoes!

    Internalise that FACT, and you'll be halfway to solving all of your problems as a nation!

    Cannibal Rabbi.

  12. the funky walrusJuly 22, 2010 at 6:50 AM

    K.S. a heads up, the Incogman blog is suspended by wordpress. I remember the great what happened to K.S. controversy at Inconman blog. That was funny.

  13. It is most interesting that Amy Goodman of Democracy Now and Greg Palast of the Guardian of London both stay as far away as possible from 9/11 Truth. Clearly everyone who is anyone has been warned that if you touch this topic you are subject to instant termination with prejudice.

    Alex Jones of PrisonPlanet seems to be the only exception and he is treated as a pariah by the corporate media. Alex Jones simply gets no corporate media coverage.

    Please note: the Anti-Semitic remarks are destructive.

  14. Anonymous.

    Alex jones is a jew joke.

    "Please note: the Anti-Semitic remarks are destructive."

    I see no anti- semitic remarks.

    If you mean Anti-khazar/jew remarks, i disagree.

    You wont cure a disease, without identifying the disease.

    The only anti-semitic remarks i see, are paraded in the msm,
    lauded and fetishized, resulting in over three million Arab corpses, counting the deaths from sanctions, preceding the second Gulf war.

    Jews aren't human.

    If they are, they display none of the qualities humanity requires, to qualify for inclusion. I see no indicators that they are overly troubled by this.
    So be it.

    So either way, who cares.

    Look at this and call me a liar!

    Cannibal Rabbi.