Thursday, August 26, 2010

Building What? New York TV Ad

This is an interesting concept to try and wake up more New Yorkers to the false flag of 9/11. My question is whether the controlled media will actually repeatedly air this ad if can come up enough money to pay for them.

Statement from BuildingWhat ...
Dear Friends,

We are pleased and tremendously excited to share this groundbreaking TV ad with you for the first time. We hope, with your help, to be able to show it to one million New Yorkers one month from now. Please go to to watch the ad and please donate generously. Every $750 we raise is enough for another spot to reach another 10,000 people. Your donation will be fully tax-deductible. 5% of it will go to the WTC Rescuers Foundation. And 5% of it will be matched by another generous donor.

Our strategy for buying spots is guided by two principles. Firstly, showing it to audiences who will respond productively and influence the public discussion, such as young people, academics, journalists and the political class. And secondly, repetition!

We will be sending off the ad two weeks from now. Between now and then we welcome your comments. We're all in this together! {more}

"Building what?" - Judge Edward Lehner upon hearing the words "Building 7" in a NYC courtroom

9/11: WTC Building 7 "Collapse" video compilation

WTC7, about to blow up, CNN

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE


  1. Shortly after 9/11 found some pics on the web that said 'the new trade center' it was four buildings with a real tall one in the middle so that it looked like a middle finger. They should build that one.

  2. very interesting ad, i will say. it will be even more interesting if it gets aired on M&M coated TV channels.

    not related but i always wonder if the sheeple of our beloved country think that no muslims died when those towers controlled demo'ed on 9/11?
    do they think that muslims were informed to stay at home that day so therefore no muslims died?

    Anyway, here is the list for all the muslim victims of 9/11.

  3. Another Paytriotard ScamAugust 26, 2010 at 10:51 PM

    "...and please donate generously..."


    Keep your hard-earned money folks.

    The mainstream media mofos will never air this ad and these hucksters know it.

  4. Well said Musique. I think in terms of the current manufactured controversy that this article can put some perspective on it.

    I disagree with the Scam comment. What better use for zionist script/federal reserve notes (notice I didn’t say dollars). To proceed with the anticipation of failure is a sure way to ensure that outcome.

  5. With little fanfare, the Pentagon is putting the finishing touches on a new strategy that will treat cyberspace as a domain of potential warfare -- and apply instant "active defense" to counter attacks that, in theory, could shut down the nation's transportation and commerce.

    Even though it deals with a distinctly 21st-century problem, the strategy has echoes of the Cold War: America's closest allies would be drawn into an early-warning network of collective cybersecurity; private industry would be mobilized in a kind of civil defense against attackers; and military commanders would be given authority to respond automatically to electronic invaders.

    In place of "massive retaliation" against attackers whose country of origin may be unclear, the strategy proposes an alternative concept of deterrence based on making America's infrastructure robust and redundant enough to survive any attack. The Department of Homeland Security would oversee this hardening of infrastructure, with help from the National Security Agency.

    William J. Lynn III, the deputy secretary of defense, explained the new approach, known as "Cyberstrategy 3.0" within the Pentagon, in an interview this week and in an article that appears in the new issue of Foreign Affairs. The formal policy should be completed by December, he said; meanwhile, the Pentagon's new "Cyber Command" will have responsibility for "active defense" starting Oct. 1.

  6. That sound about par for the course Greg. Roll out the old ‘evil foreigners’ booga booga so that they can keep us safe. They have a fevered imagination filled with lots of things to fret about – or so they say. We all know them as the naked power grabs that they truly represent.

    This reinforces the desire to see the ad shown to as many people as possible.

  7. Thanks Kenny for this one. I am posting it right now as we speak.

    OMG how could they NOT know about Building 7?

    Some of the biggest bloopers regarding the conspiracy to pull off 911 come from this crime.

    There is the greedy pig saying "So we decided to pull it" knowing he would make multiple millions because he just happened to insure it a few weeks earlier. It was a great way to get rid of a lot of CIA documentation.

    AND then the BBC reporter. FEW will even believe in the validity of this YouTube but I have been flashing it since it first was outed a day or three after 911.

    In it the silly Jane Standley reports on the horror of Bldg 7 collapsing. She even turns to the horizon and discusses how changed the skyline is now, but the bulding stands tall in the background.

    She was 25 minutes early reading and recording her pre written script.

    BBC hid the tape when it aired, but somehow it came back to haunt them.

  8. Yep.

    And I saw it myself, and told my business class the next day that I had seen this strange clip of the future, and they kept asking me for the rest of the year had I heard back from the White House about it (as I said on that day that I was sure plenty of other people had also seen it and reported it to the "authorities.") (Whoever that would be.)

    I didn't have the heart to tell them that the White House was undoubtedly entirely aware of it or actually behind it.

    And then we learned about Marvin Bush's role. And one of my very astute students did a report on the pipeline in Afghanistan being blocked by the recalcitrant Taliban.

    And, yes, this was all in 2001.

    Thanks for your fierce reporting.

    No one seems to be paying attention to mine. I'm currently working on a new piece gathering up lots of the spaghetti stands of that "event" for publishing ASAP.


    an interesting concept to try and wake up more New Yorkers to the false flag of 9/11

  9. Joni Mitchell
    Nice blog Suzan.

    Added to favorites.
    Another brick
    in the wall
    that doubles as a ladder to view the truth and things gone awry.

  10. Thank you, sweetie.

    Love to read your blog too.

    Been a Joni fan since her first album!


  11. If you want proof of demolition, freeze the frames at the :14-:17 second marks. See the vertical line of explosives on the right side of the building? The line of explosives extends from the bottom of the building all the way to the top.

    Remember kids, they hate us for our freedoms! HAHAHA!!!

  12. 911 will never be investigated. it was most likely ordered by Rothschild Organization, `purveyors of mass murder and mayhem for centuries`

  13. Many thanks Chuckyman for the fantastic i4p article link.

    Believe it or not but last night I was watching this weirdo chef named Anthony Bourdain and the show was featuring Lebanon. That was the main reason I watched it ... at least I wanted to see some good quality food! :)

    Show was unwatchable at times as he was making snarky remarks about Hezbollah since his masters trained him to do so in front of the camera.

    As you've guessed it already they chose not to mention rebuilding the Maghden Abraham Synagogue.

  14. I am about 10 years past needing any more proof.

  15. dubs that sums it up neatly. well said.

  16. it was the islamofascists, who fooled the BBC, since they own TV.

  17. Travis said it, in the short sequences in the video, how the smoke and dust comes out (on the right) and as if pressed out the windows, starting from below going quick up vertical - this can be by explosions, it has to be. Also, if it comes by collapsing floors - this is not the consequence of the fire burning on the left side.