Saturday, August 21, 2010

Wikileaks Psyops Takes a New Twist



'Honey trap' ensnares Assange? Time for Julian to cash it that 'insurance' policy?

Are these charges to discredit Wikileaks or to enhance the perception that Assange is not a part of the intelligence services?

Deception is the way of war .....



Wikileaks Founder 'wanted for rape'

Julian Assange, the founder of the whistleblowing WikiLeaks website, is reportedly wanted for rape in Sweden.

The prosecutor's office in Stockholm was said to have issued an arrest warrant late on Friday against Assange for two offences.

"Julian Assange is wanted for two different issues, one of them is that he's suspected of rape in Sweden," Karin Rosande, the director of communications, told the AFP news agency.

The other charge against the 39-year-old Australian national was said to be molestation.

Assange denied the charges on Saturday, stating on his Twitter account that the accusations were "without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing"

"No one here has been contacted by Swedish police. Needless to say this will prove hugely distracting."


Al Jazeera's Paul Brennan, in London, said: "The two alleged victims in this are in their twenties.
"One is supposed to have happened last weekend in Stockholm and another last Tuesday in Sweden but in a separate town." {more}



Additional reports:

Sweden's The Local

Guardian


Telegraph

UPDATE:

Sweden drops arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder
Aug 21 (Reuters) - Sweden has withdrawn an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who had been wanted on suspicion of rape and molestation, the National Prosecutor's Office said on Saturday. 
It said in a statement on its website that Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne had determined there were not enough grounds for the warrant.

A spokeswoman for the prosecutor's office said Assange, whose whistle-blowing website last month published secret U.S. military files on Afghanistan, was no longer wanted by Swedish authorities. 
"She (Finne) has come to the decision that he is no longer suspected of rape. All the charges concerning rape have been lifted," she told Reuters.

A police investigation will continue.

31 comments:

  1. Good call. The first thing I thought when I saw this story break was-"cred building in action".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not that a rape charge is "credibility" but obviously the idea that "the feds" are going after Assange creates the illusion that they fear him. BS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the confirmation that I'm not the only one who saw it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My conclusion exactly. Boy don't they play all sides of the illusion. They just keep it spin, spin spinning, where it stops,nobody knows.

    The average unsuspecting joe on the street doesn't have a chance to figure it out, which is why they probably don't even try.

    Besides remaining cannon fodder for IED's and flying remote killing machines, I don't think the conspiracy requires anything else from American citizens, other than to stay confused, keep their mouths shut, fat asses in their lazy boys, and watch the circus on TV.

    The sad part is that its really not that complicated. A return to natural self-interests, loyalty to family, extended family, kin, folk and race, makes the picture come into focus immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Im not sure what all this is about, but the rape charge is clearly a fraud...
    and the word 'psyops' is bandied about far to much, make me wonder if the attacks on Assange by some bloggers isnt an eg of psyop!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just asking questions anon. If the term 'psyops' is overused, have a suggestion for something else to take its place?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Roman Polanski got every break and support from the walking sacks of shit in Hollywood let's see if Assmange gets the same treatment and support (probably not).

    ReplyDelete
  8. News just broke that the authorities have "withdrawn" their warrant. More confirmation that this(and Assange/Wikileaks) is a total fraud. They even said on CNN-"one of his associates thinks this is some sort of smear campaign". More like an exercise in cred building. So obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  9. thanks, I'll add an update to the post.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A smooth operator like Assange who doesn't realize it is not wise to seek female companionship during the middle of being anointed truth teller of the ages casts doubt on his competency at best.

    I mean if you are breaking the story of a decade would you take off to two different towns in Sweden to hammer 20 year olds? Sorry Julian no sale!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I should have added this and there is always room for personal bias but Julian doesn't look like he would be up for the challenge of two 20 year old Swedish women.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tor (Plan 9 from Outer Space)August 21, 2010 at 4:07 PM

    Bwahaha Dublin! I want to go to Sweden and have some of their famous meatballs and see some D-beat crustcore and death metal bands live! Read on innernett tubes that a congresstitute said PFC Manning should be executed, I wonder if he feels the same way about Assmange.

    ReplyDelete
  13. There really is a war being fought for your mind.

    http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/wikipedia-editing-for-zionists/

    ReplyDelete
  14. QB, There are actually some decent comments at that Times article. :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. my fellow anon says:'More confirmation that this(and Assange/Wikileaks) is a total fraud. They even said on CNN-"one of his associates thinks this is some sort of smear campaign". More like an exercise in cred building. So obvious.'

    wow...what mental penetration! BUT is it so obvious? Maybe for once thngs are as they seem...that your habit of seeing fraud has muddied your judgement.
    And yes it has all the ear marks of a smear campaign. I knew that when i read the initial stories. And im someone who believes on basis of the evidence, that certain israelis along with the Neocons did 9-11!~

    ReplyDelete
  16. The jewish establishment has once again exposed itself.
    The media is a 5th colum used by the zionist jews in power.
    One thing they dont understand is the people are not as stupid as them.

    BTW: looks like the hasbra punk (cannibal rabbi) has moved on to greener pastures.
    He serves us well. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  17. Pathetic Cred-Building ExerciseAugust 22, 2010 at 2:32 AM

    Julian Assange is a 9/11 truth denier.

    That's all you need to know about him.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sorry, guys, but I'm not buying your take on Assange. I think he is what he appears, a loner with a penchant for computers and a strong sense of attacking authority, a consequence of his upbringing in an oppressive cult. I never have figured out what would motivate this guy to act as a mouthpiece for US authorities: money? sex? blackmail? Not buying it.

    How about this scenario: US authorities get some young women to make rape claims to Swedish authorities hoping for at least an interim detention. Then they immediately seek his extradition on bunkum charges such as supporting terrorism. The Swedish government is obliged to hold Assange while they process the claim and US authorities crank up the charges with a public propaganda campaign. I don't know for sure but I think the aim here was just to get him into custody and then go from there. I also think the Swedish authorities had a quick look at the rape charges and decided they didn't want to run the risk of being used to get at Assange.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wouldnt put that past the zionists. This is big power and jew communism may have figured out his weakness and exploited it.
    Does this frame up resemble Russian communist tactics to anyone here?
    It just shows how devious the power struture is.
    Speaking the truth is now threatened by smear tactics and somtimes death.
    This is a police/mafia world we live in, the freedom of men has been comprimised.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Wikileaks, Wikipedia, Wikithis, Wikithat.....WTF?

    Why do all these gatekeeper websites have the word "wiki" in their name?

    What does "wiki" mean anyway?

    Is it some sort of Zio-Masonic code word?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hey Anonymous, I'm the Anonymous you responded to. Good for you, you know neocons and zionists did 9/11. Yet you still trust an OBVIOUS fraud in Assange.

    Lets see-Assange denies 9/11 truth. RED FLAG. Assange and Wikileaks have been covered extensively by the media ever since its inception. RED FLAG. Wikileaks so called "Afghan leaks" made it clear that "we have to stay in AfPak! Pakistan is working with the Taliban!!!!(according to the media that has championed wikileaks). RED FLAG. Oh, and Wikileaks even managed to slip in that Osama Bin Laden is still alive and kicking, thus preserving the boogeyman for those dumb enough to still think he was involved in 911 and is still alive. Obvious RED FLAG. Sorry buddy, wikileaks is obviously a fraud and you just don't seem to have the "mental penetration" to realize it.

    I agree with the guy above about cannibal rabbi though, glad that hasbarat is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Of course the hasbarat is back. He has a job to do. "No jews,har har". Too transparent.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Cannibal Rabbi shows up, making yet another link unusable. His likely purpose it would seem.

    I usually email links like this story to many people and drop them all over the web on various political/news blogs but I pretty much cant do that when this obvious ADL troll shows up with his "jew jew jew, little boys,faggots,I'm afraid and oppressed,blah blah" turd in the punch bowl schtick.

    Mission accomplished hasbarat, you have the intended effect of suppressing valuable information that comes from this and other sites that you megaphone types infect. Don't worry kenny, I won't go tit for tat with this hasbarat assclown again, just putting the warning about his type out there.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The following came in my email comment notification but is not showing up here so I'm manually adding it. This has happened several times lately, supposedly a google glitch. ???

    -----

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Wikileaks Psyops Takes a New Twist":

    You need to stop your propeller from working overtime, anon(7:48am).

    Lets see-Assange denies 9/11 truth. RED FLAG. So people either publicly espouse that 911 was an inside job or they must be either working for the Pentagon, or be Jewish, or both, is that it? Perhaps he has simply steered clear of the issue, regarding it as containing too many divisive proponents? Perhaps he wants to focus on verifiable leaks from primary sources close to the US government? Ask yourself what would happen to his public credibility on leaked government documents if he came out as a 911 "truther"? -- however unreasonable it might be, he would be publicly lumped with "faked the moon landings" crowd. He does what he does: expose government insider documents.

    Assange and Wikileaks have been covered extensively by the media ever since its inception. RED FLAG. Hello? The leaks have been a major negative for US propaganda. Read the newspaper articles. Most of them are saying that the leaks reveal Afghanistan as a US policy mess: corrupt partners, US war crimes, a losing war. If that's a deep and devious exercise by the Pentagon or the US State Dept to garner support for their efforts in Afghanistan then it's a stupid one, an "own goal" in soccer parlance.

    Wikileaks so called "Afghan leaks" made it clear that "we have to stay in AfPak! Pakistan is working with the Taliban!!!!(according to the media that has championed wikileaks). RED FLAG. Assange never said that as far as I can tell. He divulged a truckload of unedited primary intel documents from US military on the ground in Afghanistan. Those documents showed that Pakistan was supporting some Taliban groups all along, an open secret to US policy makers. And "the media that has championed wikileaks" were dragged to the issue because of the participation of major European media agencies.

    Also, Pakistan has had a Western-aligned leadership for quite some time and has had to tread a balancing act between supporting Western aims and protecting its own local geopolitical interests. All of these issues are discussed in detail in an excellent article by Michael Scheuer.

    Oh, and Wikileaks even managed to slip in that Osama Bin Laden is still alive and kicking, thus preserving the boogeyman for those dumb enough to still think he was involved in 911 and is still alive. Obvious RED FLAG. Assange never said that as far as I can tell. In the truckload of unedited primary intel documents from US military on the ground in Afghanistan some of THOSE PEOPLE claimed that Osama was still alive. Where did THEY get this "info" which they uncritically passed on to their bosses? Probably from local Afghan sources wishing to get paid or ingratiate themselves with their foreign bosses. It was only ever rumor even in the original documents.

    What exactly do you expect Assange to do with raw intel documents, edit out the ones he doesn't like according to some preset ideological criteria? He published a truckload of raw US on-the-ground data and has let the public assess it which is all that one could reasonably expect of him.

    Sorry buddy, wikileaks is obviously a fraud and you just don't seem to have the "mental penetration" to realize it. You might try turning your brain on as well. Not everyone who disagrees with you is either CIA or NWO. A bit of nuance wouldn't go astray. Try to get beyond the slogans.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Here is how it happened-Asssange went OUT OF HIS WAY to throw 9/11 truth under the bus while referencing "actual conspiracies". If he was too much of a coward to take on 9/11 truth that would be one thing but the fact that he goes out of his way(so people on "the left" will reject them as well) to reject 9/11 truth is another. And I said nothing about him being a jew.

    Assange has not "exposed" a goddamn thing, what his "leaks" DID do is put more heat on Pakistan and reinforce the phony "war on terror". That is what HAS happened.

    FYI-Michael Scheuer was the head of the CIA "Bin Laden unit' and he spews propaganda ALL THE TIME. Trusting him is at best naive.

    Cryptome(who I also do not trust) at least had the balls to post WTC7 pics and info showing NIST's "investigations" into the WTC were a fraud. Wikileaks could have done that. They didn't, instead Assange throws 9/11 truth under the bus.

    You disagree with me and I don't think you are "CIA or NWO". I think you are simply being gullible.

    You can rationalize the wikileaks docs and rationalize the "Bin Laden is alive" crap as "just a rumor" but guess what? IT HAD THE END RESULT OF REINFORCING THE LIES-this case the BIG lie that Osama is still alive and a "terror mastermind" in most peoples minds.

    As far as the media, you are simply wrong. When wikileaks was first formed, way before they put out literally ANYTHING the media, the US MEDIA was championing them and giving them free press. Yes, that is a huge red flag.

    Wikileaks is about damage control. Support for the "war on terror" is flagging so wikileaks injected it with some much needed support. Most people come away from those docs thinking-"Osama is alive and Pakistan works with terrorists. Guess we gotta stay in AfPak to "be safe".". Just because it does not have that effect on YOU does not mean it doesn't on most people. It does.

    ReplyDelete
  26. MSNBC(owned by defense contractor GE) is now heavily taking up the cause of Julian Assange, one of their rotating stories for the day(the kind they do over and over-heavy rotation) is-"Were the allegations against Assange a smear campaign meant to discredit him?". No, more like the opposite as evidenced by the corporate media coverage. Not enough people bought into wikileaks being genuine so they need to prop them up further. Try again media.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thank you anonymous (6:34 AM). You responded to my views and I appreciate that. I've yet to be convinced but I am certainly open to any evidence you can point to about Assange being a psyops exercise.

    Do you have any web links to his 911 statements?

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sure, heres a link:

    There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news." What about 9/11? "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." [Hmm. Maybe that explains why the CIA hasn't 'found' him. Can you say 'limited hangout?']

    http://www.legitgov.org/Wikileaks-founder-Julian-Assange-annoyed-911-truth

    ReplyDelete
  29. So lets see-exposing standard operating procedure in Afghanistan has NOT slowed down or stopped the wars. Ignoring/belittling 9/11 sure hasn't either. If Assange is not an actual agent working on behalf of the warmongers then he is one piss poor anti-war activist. Only 9/11 truth will set us free.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Jesus Jeans (Hecho en Mexico)August 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM

    Who really funds wikileaks? Would Assmange reveal it? I didn't think so either it was rhetorical.

    ReplyDelete