Monday, November 15, 2010

Deadly Shanghai skyscraper fire but no collapse

Deadly blaze rips through Shanghai skyscraper

The laws of physics stand. Another steel framed building does not collapse from fire.



  1. Stand back it’s going to go...any minute now... honestly it is.... anyway, what channel’s X factor on?

    How many of these does it take to prove that the 3 NY skyscrapers had more than a little ‘assistance’ in coming down?

  2. It truly amazes me that people really think fire brought down the towers on 9/11. The PYSOP worked great on most people.

  3. Dammit, where are the "dancing Chinese muzzies" with y'hiddy caps?

  4. HuffPost is now allowing 9/11 'troofer' comments. What's the world coming to?

  5. I’m sure if I should be happy of terrified.

  6. Ooops - that should read “happy or terrified”

  7. NIST will come up with an explanation!!!

    Since it was being renovated, woder if any of those 9/11 steel beams that were shipped ASAP to China were being used?

  8. Sorry Arianna, you made your choice a long time ago with your policy of censoring all rational 9/11 comments. History will not forget the media whores who engaged in such deceptions. Mainstream,alternative,online and all other forms of media will have to answer for their silence/mockery of the 9/11 truth movement. In fact, there are many in the so called truth movement who will have a lot to answer for as well-I'm thinking of the LIHOP shills,the Alex Jones/blame "NWO" crowd, 911blogger and those who attack people who lay the blame where it belongs-at the feet of both Israelis and Americans. There will be a reckoning, some people can feel it and are adjusting as such(Geraldo,Huffington etc.)

  9. I wish I could believe it's because the media is getting scared. I think this apparent willingness to discuss 9/11 alternative theories is just a necessary script change to better appease their waning audiences. They'll never allow it to go anywhere or hold individuals accountable. As for NIST, they'll probably just amend their finding to say it was the heat from the fires in combination with the additional heat caused by global warming that brought the buildings down. :)

  10. This is nothing compared to 9/11. It's no where near as tall and didn't have a Boeing 767 fly into it at 100's of mph at the top!!!

  11. World Trade Center 7December 20, 2010 at 10:09 PM

    You're right.

    It looks much closer in size to World Trade Center Building 7, which also "didn't have a Boeing 767 fly into it at 100's of mph at the top!!"

    And yet, strangely(?), the 47 story steel-framed WTC 7 collapsed at Free Fall Speed, into its own footprint, at 5.20 the afternoon of 911, into a neat pile of rubble a few stories high. Due to a few low-grade fires on a few floors?

    Yeah, right.

    WTC 7 was a classic controlled demolition pre-wired long before the day of 911.

    WTC 1 and 2, which were designed and built to withstand multiple airliner accidents, were top down controlled demolitions.

    The same breed of psychos who lied about the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, the USS Liberty, the Gulf of Tonkin, the Babies in Incubators, Saddam's WMD's, etc., also lied about 911.

    They are known for their Big Lies, and we are known for swallowing them (unfortunately).

    Whatever Big Lie they have planned to "justify" their impending Third World War, you will also swallow.