Thursday, January 13, 2011

9/11 WTC 7 Demolition - Why The Building Really Fell

video by IranContraScumDid911
 

             



 
 
"Never let a good opportunity to wave a false flag go to waste."

14 comments:

  1. hippie doper maggots use side entranceJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM

    8ball says insurance money for Lucky Larry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IranContraScumDid911 has produced a lot of interesting videos.

    - Aangirfan

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, his name is highly misleading though. I guess there is some overlap but as far as I know Zakheim and Silverstein were not involved in Iran contra.

    ReplyDelete
  4. most agree, 7 was controlled demolition-no plane.
    and penacon was a missile-no plane.
    But then they leave their logic at the door and say 'the twin towers had planes because i saw it on TV'. Friends, remember the moon landing hoax? It was on TV too! Notice that Jones,Rense,Galloway,Avery,Lawson etc all piss on 'no planes' Why? They are all disinfo. 'no planes' means no Arabs and no reason to go to war. The perps want you to blame CIA or Israel, Then their usury central banks and parasitic monarchy can continue. Who are the perps? A satanic death cult called 'The crown' and Rothschild Illuminati bankers, oh yea, they also did 7/7 subway bombs, and Smolensk. General acceptance of 'no planes' will kill the Illuminati and British Monarchy and corporation usa, the fed etc, please spread the word

    ReplyDelete
  5. No planes people are meant to make the 9/11 truth movement look stupid. RED HERRING. But hey, anybody who pushes "illuminati" fiction is likely gullible enough to buy into that stuff. No offense. I agree though, no plane at the Pentagon but that does not automatically mean "no planes" at the towers. I actually do lean towards the planes being used to hit the towers not being the original aircraft though. General acceptance of the facts showing that 9/11 was done by Israelis and Americans is more than enough to enact actual accountability, the "no planes" red herring is meant to slow down the progress of that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The 9/11 flag - it full of holes that have to be covered with......more flags [ aka patriotism, nothing to see ,salute, move along]

    cheers

    ReplyDelete
  7. 'But hey, anybody who pushes "illuminati" fiction is likely gullible enough to buy into that stuff.'

    read:

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/illuminati/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Illuminati is a nice little term meant to shield ACTUAL real people from scrutiny and accountability, in many cases zionists who like nothing more than for people to stay worried about fiction like the "illuminati" and "NWO" while giving them a pass. Alex Jones comes to mind.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anon@9:26,what do you have to say about this?

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/israel/

    See, thats my point. People like you unfortunately let real criminals off the hook and fall for that illuminati/NWO BS. They link to Alan Fucking Keyes, neocon/zionist whore on that site for christ sake. Come on man.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @January 15, 2011 11:29 AM

    you're right, I missed the Israel stuff on that site, otherwise I would have found another link- It's an outrage. I'm not trying to downplay Israel's role in 911, they did it. However, i believe the order 'for something very big' came from Illuminati banker-Rothschild , the creator or Israel. And the bankers are actual people, like Mossad agent Mike Harari, whom Dimitri Khalezov says planted explosives in the the twin tower floors where the missiles (cartoon planes added later) hit

    ReplyDelete
  11. "the bankers" are actual people "the illuminati" are not and thats my point. Dov Zakheim is a real person. Larry Silverstein is a real person. Dick Cheney is a real person. Dominic Suter is a real person etc. When you say "the illuminati" did something you let those real criminals off of the hook which I'm afraid is the whole point of "NWO" rhetoric. Obfuscation.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As far as Khalezov and his allegations go, I would not dismiss anything out of hand but I also would not be surprised if he is just more disinfo meant to throw people off or discredit those who push him. The buildings were "professionally" done for sure though, that much we can be sure of.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello, friends, Thanks you for your continued support.

    ReplyDelete
  14. IC, we all thank you for your work. You've put together one heck of an important historical archive.

    ReplyDelete