Sunday, September 11, 2011


The 10th anniversary of 9/11 has brought an all out blitz on the sensibilities of rational thinking people everywhere.

We won't trivialize the loss of life on that day or the ongoing death and destruction and the sorrow felt by so many.that arose from the lies and myths. Neither will we worship at the alter of the pseudo religion of 9/11.

Our own personal tribute goes out to those who have refused to be silent. Those who have faced the ridicule, scorn, name calling and alienation from friends and family and strangers by speaking truth in a world of deception. It is those who have the courage of conviction against the onslaught of lies that continue to give us strength. We realize we are not alone.

All that is left to say at this moment is ..... Thank You. 


  1. Thank you Kenny for your continuing valuable contribution - this blog. Thank you also to all Sideshow commenters.

    Sincerely, Mouser

  2. Kenny,

    Football today is going to be a pain the ass to watch.

    Keep up the great work.



    As hard as it may be at first to come to terms with, the most solid evidence left from 9/11 is to be found on film : a thorough analysis of the 9/11 TV archives and every single so-called "amateur" video clip betrays that the 'airplanes' we saw on TV were entirely fabricated with digitally-generated imagery. This of course implies that the big TV networks' were complicit in this massive hoax - their role forming an integral part of this false-flag operation aimed at creating a fictitious enemy of the Western World - whose gigantic military machine would otherwise rot in a hangar.

    Today, TV is the enemy : no mainstream media can be trusted as they serve the vested interests of a handful of bandits who dominate the World economy. This is not hard to understand, nor is it difficult to see how the newsmedia relentlessly pushes the fake 'War on Terror' agenda aimed at subduing hapless nations, plunder their resources and enrich the few.

    Predictably, a growing effort is under way to stir up utter confusion around the TV FAKERY research. A typical tactic is to call this research "government sponsored disinformation"... I ask all level-headed people to keep their spirits balanced and understand that this is a 'natural' development which should be of no surprise to anyone : as this research leads to the hottest smoking gun of 9/11 (along with many more who, alas, have all failed to launch a real inquiry), we can only expect major efforts will be deployed to discredit the TV fakery research. They will not succeed - for the evidence available today is simply beyond debate.

    Enormously popular films like Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Loosechange" have hit the mainstream scene to give the common man the feeling that we live in a free speech society. I used to believe in them myself - not anymore - as it is evident they promote only attractive theories but no proof : the only verifiable, repeatable and thus court-admissible proof we have is the video fabrications aired by the newsmedia on 9/11. Of course the towers were demolished with powerful explosives, yet this is nothing that can be demonstrated in any scientific way as all the rubble has long been disposed with. In fact, a total of 9 buildings were wiped off the map as a result of the demolition job. What? NINE buildings? Yes - but most people are simply not aware of this fact.

    It is now emerging that the twin towers were most probably empty as they collapsed. The alleged victims have been found to be fictitious identities generated with a computer database. A crew of actors are, still today, impersonating "angry family members who push for a new investigation" and get extensive press coverage to uphold the all-important myth of "the 9/11 victims". Once again, this sounds like a crazy conjecture to most people. However, the evidence now at hand is as massive as the hoax itself.

    Simon Shack

  4. Simon I agree with almost everything you say except about the towers being empty at the time of demolition.

    The people waving for help from upper floors in many photos, the people jumping, the people Barry Jennings stepped over in building 7, the Jersey girls' husbands, Bob McIlvain's son - all these people I believe died in the buildings on 9/11, 2001.

    I will concede the number who perished may have been inflated to 3000 perhaps by ten fold.

    Alan Hart gave a fantastic speech about his new book in Freiburg, Germany today (9/11, 2011) discussing the difference between Zionism and Judaism.



    This story smells bad.

    Are we supposed to believe a corpse just happened to turn up in freezer - holding over three thousand?

    Let me guess the freezer was found in zionist rebel owned territory

    No Libyan believes Qaddafi is pro-zionist.

    This story is a Mossad propaganda piece against Qaddafi.


  6. We now have 9/11 "celebrations".

    I call it victimology - strong nations - USA, Israel - use past tragedies to justify inflicting new ones.


  7. that, ten years after the fact, there are still people promoting planes flying into steel towers.

    The impossible physics, the fake videos and the great risk of using real planes should at least make them seriously doubt.

    Also tv/news-fakery is totally ignored by them, while it should be promoted as a great danger to humanity. Far more that a million dead and counting, all innocent, all because of a hoax.

    What an anti-human lowlife these media scumbags are...

    Also sad that the litmus-test guy failed the real test.

    But who knows what the future will bring eh...
    Never too late to learn.

    Thanks from the EUSSR.

  8. Hey Kenny,...Bravissimo! I see they are talking up the "now traditional" reading of the names of the victims on 911. I will attend the next 911 "celebration" if they announce they are to read the names of the real perpetraitors!

    "A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."
    Malcolm X


  9. Official 9/11 Fairy Tale
    Posted on September 11, 2011 by Barbara Peterson

    Barb’s note: This was originally sent to me via e-mail by Eric. It was tracked down to a comment on Telegraph Article “Charlie Sheen urges Barack Obama to reopen 9/11 investigation in video message,” with the ending paragraph added by LiveLeak.

    The Official Version of 9/11 goes something like this…

    Directed by a beardy-guy from a cave in Afghanistan, nineteen hard-drinking, coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances before their mission to meet Allah…

    Using nothing more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew, passengers and pilots on four planes…

    And hangover or not, they manage to give the world’s most sophisticated air defense system the slip…

    Unphased by leaving their “How to Fly a Passenger Jet” guide in the car at the airport, they master the controls in no-time and score direct hits on two towers, causing THREE to collapse completely…

    Our masterminds even manage to overpower the odd law of physics or two… and the world watches in awe as steel-framed buildings fall symmetrically – through their own mass – at free-fall speed, for the first time in history.

    Despite all their dastardly cunning, they stupidly give their identity away by using explosion-proof passports, which survive the fireball undamaged and fall to the ground… only to be discovered by the incredible crime-fighting sleuths at the FBI…

    …Meanwhile down in Washington…

    Hani Hanjour, having previously flunked 2-man Cessna flying school, gets carried away with all the success of the day and suddenly finds incredible abilities behind the controls of a Boeing…

    Instead of flying straight down into the large roof area of the Pentagon, he decides to show off a little…

    Executing an incredible 270 degree downward spiral, he levels off to hit the low facade of the world’s most heavily defended building…

    …all without a single shot being fired…. or ruining the nicely mowed lawn… and all at a speed just too fast to capture on video…

    …Later, in the skies above Pennsylvania…

    So desperate to talk to loved ones before their death, some passengers use sheer willpower to connect mobile calls that otherwise would not be possible until several years later…

    And following a heroic attempt by some to retake control of Flight 93, it crashes into a Shankesville field leaving no trace of engines, fuselage or occupants… except for the standard issue Muslim terrorists bandana…

    …Further south in Florida…

    President Bush, our brave Commander-in-Chief continues to read “My Pet Goat” to a class full of primary school children… shrugging off the obvious possibility that his life could be in imminent danger…

    …In New York…

    World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein blesses his own foresight in insuring the buildings against terrorist attack only six weeks previously…

    While back in Washington, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz shake their heads in disbelief at their own luck in getting the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ catalyzing event they so desired to pursue their agenda of world domination…

    And finally, not to be disturbed too much by reports of their own deaths, at least seven of our nineteen suicide hijackers turn up alive and kicking in mainstream media reports…

  10. Israel Did 9/11 – All The Proof

  11. My first inkling that something was wrong with the official 9/11 story came a few days after the attacks.

    I kept waiting for the alleged terrorists to make a public statement explaining their motives but, instead, all I heard was that obviously phony bit of rubbish about hating us for our freedom from Bush & Co.

    Why the fuck would a terrorist group go to all that trouble and then leave it up to a bunch of scummy politicians to tell us what their motives were?

    The usual purpose of terrorism is to send a message, is it not?

    So why did they shy away from sending one once the world spotlight was on them?

    It made no sense to me then and it makes no sense to me now.

    My suspicion is that the plotters (the Mossad and their American helpers) originally planned to release a dramatic announcement revealing the motives of the terrorists complete with a declaration of war on the US, but they realized at the last moment that it sounded too silly and too hokey so they decided to let Bush tell us why they did what they did.

    Also, there was the Israel angle.

    Real Muslim terrorists would've implicated our pro-Israel foregn policy as the primary reason for their actions but not fake ones because the fakes were afraid it might cause a groundswell of anti-Israel sentiment in the US.

    The plotters didn't want to take any chances in that regard.

  12. Hi Kenny,

    See the real terrorists of 9/11


    Hmmm ...don't they all look familiar?

  13. Hell yeah Kenny!! We've been causing a ruckus out here in San Diego! We had a very successful day at the USS Midway today, and really reached a lot of people. Lots of tourists, international visitors, military folks, and others stopped by to check out what we were presenting. Very good pictures coming real soon! I'll post a link hopefully by tomorrow. We're making progress on a daily basis.

    I am 100% on board with Simon Shack. There are 3 important angles to 9/11:

    1. the obvious Israeli/Zionist angle
    2. the video fakery/media hoax angle
    3. the pysop angle- fake victims, 9/11 actors, and other frauds perpetuating the victim myth

    People did died on 9/11, no doubt. But the entire event is a staged Hollywood production any way you look at it. It's literally all a steaming pile of dog shit, including the planes, videos, and many of the victims. Simon has done extremely valuable work for this movement by helping to expose these facts.

    Simon, what are the sources you're citing to document the building being systematically emptied and prepared for destruction? I've heard Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams talk about this, but never got a source...

  14. No Planers = No BrainersSeptember 12, 2011 at 4:40 AM

    No more "no plane" crap please.

  15. This article is interesting, just not really sure what in the hell he's trying to say.

    That some kind of cosmic force actually caused the WTC to collapse on 9/11?

    Reads like one big psyop article to take the heat off Israel and the Neocon scum behind 9/11.

    Unfiltered History – The Home of Thought Provoking Ideas, Articles and Essays

    Tried to leave a comment, but he's closed the comments down.

    The original story is at this link:

    Pictures of Mini Nukes at PakAlert Prove 9-11 was a Metaphysical Catechism (Test)

    “The events of 9/11 are immensely complex, beyond words really, with so many causes, consequences, and dimensions. But the planetary archetypal situation was dramatically clear. In the last few weeks the planetary alignment that represents the heaviest—the darkest, most weighty, mortally serious, historically grave—of all archetypal combinations, the Saturn-Pluto alignment, reached exactitude, an opposition.

    The first two weeks of this month in particular were critical, as the Sun and Full Moon moved into a rare and extraordinarily precise grand cross (two oppositions--Saturn with Pluto, Sun with Moon--both 90 degree square to each other).” Click here to read ”Notes on World Trade Center attack September 11, 2001” by Richard Tarnas

    The following is the recent chronology leading up to the decision by PakAlert (TPTB) to promote mini-nukes and DEWs instead of the absurd, unproven theory of controlled demolition by Steven Jones.

    His story about 'Lucky Larry' Silverstein losing money on the WTC demolitions is laughable to the point of it being absurd. He conveniently neglects to mention the huge asbestos problem and removal of the same from the 'Twins.'

  16. No plane is the latest disinfo craze meant to protect Dov Zakheim and the zioinists who actually controlled the ACTUAL planes. No planes(at tht WTC) is meant to protect the zionist element involved in 9/11.

  17. WTC Eyewitness "a bomb went off in the lobby first,then a plane hit"

  18. Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy
    By ‘Shadow’ and ‘Pax’ – Conspiracynewsnet

    In a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" published by The American Enterprise's "Project for a New American Century"(1), System Planning Corporation (SPC) International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" being necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region. A respected and established voice in the intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted, and Dov went from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. (2) Perhaps not so coincidentally, it was an SPC subsidiary, TRIDATA CORPORATION, that oversaw the investigation after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.

    SPC, according to their official website, specializes in many areas of defense technology production and manufacture, including a system developed by their Radar Physics Group called the Flight Termination System, or FTS.(3) This is a system used to destroy target drones (craft that would be fired on by test aircraft or weaponry) in the event of malfunction or "misses". This highly sophisticated war-game technology allows the control of several 'drones' from a remote location, on varying frequencies, and has a range of several hundred miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets.


  19. I submitted a comment earlier about Dov Zakheim which didn't post. In case it got lost, here is what I linked to, along with some additional material:

    Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy

    The photos which originally accompanied that article are now not there. Here are some similar ones:

    The Missile Pod of 9/11 and the Cover-Up
    Updated September 8, 2011

    Bollyn quotes Capt. Thomas Deatherage:

    Capt. Thomas Deatherage – Former commercial airline pilot. Aircraft flown: Boeing 737, 747. Certified Flight Instructor (single and multi-engine and instrument). 9,000+ total hours flown.
    Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
    "I am so happy that a professional organization is finally trying to dig up the truth!

    I am a former airline captain with over 9,000 flight hours, Captain on both the Boeing 747-400 and 737- 300.

    After viewing many posted videos on "Youtube" I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft # 2 B-767 - was radio controlled into the building – Tower 2. The "pod" mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by "Martin Marietta" Corporation in Los Angeles.

    The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with tower # 2.

    Also, I would like to find an “insider” “A and P” mechanic at both United and America to cross reference the A/C serial number of flight 77 and 93. I guarantee that they change the “N” issued tail number. However, one could trace and find this original A/C, from an insider employee, at these companies- leading to the smoking gun these aircraft were not destroyed.

    Lastly, I was based at Cincinnati airport-which is where both aircraft flew to, and where: NASA AMES is located, and where all passengers were off-loaded before they where 'eliminated'."

    Why wouldn't the perpetrators of 9/11 have used real aircraft? It appears to me that the only fake video footage has been faked by those who are claiming video fakery.

  20. I'll debate flat earth over planes on 911- there were none, in spite of reLIEable LIE witnesses like Gary Welz and Harley Guy and MSM employees. Plane huggers, direct me to physical evidence please- save your time, there is none |

  21. Red herring. The point of Harley Guiy was to implant the thought of "structural failure due to the intense fire" as he said. This no plane shit is a bad joke.

    Who benefits from their being no actual planes on 9/11? The people controlling them. Gee, I wonder where the no planes bullshit originated?

  22. Toronto hearings are a controlled BS event to push for a never ending investigation. To paraphrase Globalist shill David Ray Griffin .
    'some even think there were no planes, that holograms were used'

    i guess he's trying to explain the eye witnesses. hey Griffin- they are all lying, they're actors.

    of course he doesn't explain what the hell CNN was broadcasting- video of holograms? no, just CGI
    The truth was absent from the Toronto BS session because the truth is that the lie is bigger than the general public can handle

  23. the planes were nearly empty, 75-85% empty. unusual for popular destinations.

    listened to brokaw on msnbc's repeat. he sounded like a right wing loon.

    he also seemed to be emphasizing points to come later, eg, nothing will be the same and american's
    will have to except change.
    tommy b., what did you know and when did you know it?

  24. so many infiltrators.

  25. Anon at 10:57 AM: "Plane huggers, direct me to physical evidence please- save your time, there is none"

    No More Myths: As you well know, there is no physical evidence because it has been destroyed. What evidence is there for video fakery? Altered videos that purportedly prove video fakery. Were all of the videos and still photos taken by many different people from different angles fakes? That would have been quite a feat for the perps.

    Again, why wouldn't the perpetrators of 9/11 have used real aircraft? Dov Zakheim and his fellow tribesmen had the remote control planes at their disposal—why would they resort to CGI? The Israelis certainly used real planes when they attacked the USS Liberty!

  26. "why wouldn't the perpetrators of 9/11 have used real aircraft? "

    answ. :

    because a real plane wouldn't enter the steel tower(s).

    Show me the science that explains how alu sheet constructions, like wingtips and tail, can cut through steel tubes and concrete floors ?

    The perps knew Newtons laws, they knew materials and construction strength.

    And THAT is why they FAKED it.

    The following answers i've seen already, please don't repeat, they won't do :

    -Newton is a disinfo agent.
    -no brainer.
    -( rather new)No planes(at tht WTC) is meant to protect the zionist element involved in 9/11.
    ( the zio-media perps eh...)

    Many thanks for a serious respons...

  27. @ Kenny: Thank you for your blog! I read it every day I get to a computer. Here's an inspiring 5-minute clip about the heros of 9-11 truth:
    9/11 TRUTH CANNOT BE STOPPED! - Sept 11, 2009 New York City

    @ joe anon1: I saw that repeat as well, it was obvious the whole thing was scripted in advance. Brokaw has had more emotion in his voice reporting a political debate. I also noticed one didn't see the towers collapse "live", either. The first to fall was completely obscured by smoke. The second one fell while they were running footage on something else -- I think the Pentagon. Why? So they wouldn't accidently expose any squibs going off, or something? And already Brokaw was talking about Osama bin Laden. Plus they shamelessly kept in that footage of the "dancing Palestinians," footage we now know is a lie (it was stock footage from before 9-11-01). How convenient they rerun that particularly nasty bit of slanderous propaganda just before the question of Palestinian statehood comes up in the UN.

  28. 9/11 was done by Rothschild through Mossad and US secret services for geopolitical gain and introduction of the zionist new world order where the international bankers own and control everything.

    Problem, reaction, solution - by those who created the problem. Hegelian principles.

    Arabs attacking America, fear, the war on terror with the murdering of brown people sitting on desired resources and implementation of a police state domestically.

  29. The following article and the videos linked to therein cover just about everything concerning the subject:

    9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory
    by Anthony Lawson

  30. people in Toronto paid to listen to Griffin's analysis of phone calls that never took place made by non existent people on non existent planes. he calls these things 'anomalies'

    Hey Griffin, I call it bullshit

  31. Lawson? He's a spook.

  32. Personally, I think that until we can get the majority of Americans agree that the "official story" of 9-11 is bullshit, the question of whether or not planes were used is a divide-and-conquer distraction in the movement. There are many more clear-cut examples that prove we have been lied to by government and the media -- like building 7. Everyone, I should hope, can agree that open fire can't melt steel and office fires can't bring down skyscrapers in their own footprint.

  33. We can only truly mourn the many murdered that day and the millions murdered and maimed since when we nail the vampires that planned and carried out the deeds that day. We all know the names and we should now be aware of their power structures.

    The coming times will tell who wins this round of history – the humans or the psychopaths. Well done Greg and thank YOU for keeping the light of enquiry alive with all your hard work.

  34. I saw this comment by "est" at Smoking Mirrors and I hope you don't mind if I repost it here, Kenny, because it kind of dovetails with your salute:

    not sure who wrote this
    but most of you, are in it


    On the surface of the world right now there is
    war and violence and things seem dark.
    But calmly and quietly, at the same time,
    something else is happening underground
    An inner revolution is taking place
    and certain individuals are being called to a higher light.
    It is a silent revolution.
    From the inside out. From the ground up.
    This is a Global operation.
    A Spiritual Conspiracy.
    There are sleeper cells in every nation on the planet.
    You won’t see us on the TV.
    You won’t read about us in the newspaper
    You won’t hear about us on the radio
    We don’t seek any glory
    We don’t wear any uniform
    We come in all shapes and sizes, colors and styles
    Most of us work anonymously
    We are quietly working behind the scenes
    in every country and culture of the world
    Cities big and small, mountains and valleys,
    in farms and villages, tribes and remote islands
    You could pass by one of us on the street
    and not even notice
    We go undercover
    We remain behind the scenes
    It is of no concern to us who takes the final credit
    But simply that the work gets done
    Occasionally we spot each other in the street
    We give a quiet nod and continue on our way
    During the day many of us pretend we have normal jobs
    But behind the false storefront at night
    is where the real work takes a place
    Some call us the Conscious Army
    We are slowly creating a new world
    with the power of our minds and hearts
    We follow, with passion and joy
    Our orders come from the Central Spiritual Intelligence
    We are dropping soft, secret love bombs when no one is looking
    Poems ~ Hugs ~ Music ~ Photography ~ Movies ~ Kind words ~
    Smiles ~ Meditation and prayer ~ Dance ~ Social activism ~ Websites
    Blogs ~ Random acts of kindness…
    We each express ourselves in our own unique ways
    with our own unique gifts and talents
    Be the change you want to see in the world
    That is the motto that fills our hearts
    We know it is the only way real transformation takes place
    We know that quietly and humbly we have the
    power of all the oceans combined
    Our work is slow and meticulous
    Like the formation of mountains
    It is not even visible at first glance
    And yet with it entire tectonic plates
    shall be moved in the centuries to come
    Love is the new religion of the 21st century
    You don’t have to be a highly educated person
    Or have any exceptional knowledge to understand it
    It comes from the intelligence of the heart
    Embedded in the timeless evolutionary pulse of all human beings
    Be the change you want to see in the world
    Nobody else can do it for you
    We are now recruiting
    Perhaps you will join us
    Or already have
    All are welcome
    The door is open………
    Love to you my brothers and sisters

  35. Hey Kenny,...anons, if there were "NO Planes", why did the yiddish khazars send THREE teams out and about NY to set up cameras to record the event?????? Hello? Oh, to implicate israhell, by getting caught monitoring Planes crashing that never were, perhaps??? Go back to your PlayStations and into your own pseudo reality lifestyles: Maybe in your SIMS world the Planes were digital, Trekker fools.


  36. Thanks to all for dropping by and adding to the commentary.

    Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don't but basically we're all heading in the same direction, looking for the truth.

    Jody, I had missed "A SPIRITUAL CONSPIRACY." That was great.

  37. Holy shit I agree with veritas for once. And I'll say it again(and again and again if I have to)-the "no planes" crap IS IN FACT meant to protect the zionists who did 9/11.

    Jody makes a good point about divide and conquer as well, the no planes crap has that effect for sure.

  38. Ironically enough Lawson protects zionists just like the "no planers" do, albeit in different ways. I asked him directly about Israeli involvement in 9/11 and why he doesn't "go there" and he couldn't have been more defensive. I didn't accuse him of anything, just simply asked why he has yet to confront the evidence of Israeli involvement and he basically lost it. You can probably still read the exchange in the comments section of one of his recent youtube videos.

  39. no planes does not let Zionists off the hook, they control MSM, it was a media hoax

  40. They just finished the Toronto Hearings, they avoided media fakery and no planes. The only reason to COMPLETELY avoid something so obvious is that it's the truth. The perps prefer to watch 'truthers' chasing their tails for another decade, because the perps know the truth (media hoax) will bring down the whole system. plane huggers, please tell what kind of planes you saw, where you saw them, and direct me to the PHYSICAL evidence

  41. Plane/no-plane is divide and conquer.

    The zionists control the government and the MSM - so it doesn't let the perpetrators off the hook either way.

    Not as relevant as stopping the zionist NWO by exposing that Arabs had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

    The the US and Israel did 9/11.

  42. The no plane nutters make me sick.

    Every time I see one of them blubbering on in the comments section, it makes me feel like I'm wasting my time.

  43. So the 5 dancing/taping Israelis are innocent? Dominic Suter is innocent? Dov Zakheim is innocent? No, I don't think so. How do you explain their guilt if the planes didn't exist? Instead of actual names like the above that can be tied to other names like Silverstein,Hauer,Lowy etc. in your scenario we have "the whole f'ing media" meaning we really have nobody on the hook. See the point of the no plane disinfo yet?

  44. The goal of the no plane nonsense is not to divide and conquer.

    The goal is to make us all look like DROOLING MORONS.

    Anyone who can't see that is hopeless.

  45. If anyone's interested I just posted some photos from the San Diegans for 9/11 Truth outreach event on 9/11. See them here:

  46. the Toronto hearings had an obligation to debunk no plane theory. they didn't even try.

  47. Do they have an obligation to debunk Judy Woods bullshit too? Mini nukes? What else do they have an "obligation" to debunk?

  48. that the steel, used for the prerimeter walls was astm a36, with a tieldstrength of 36 ksi.


    "Above the 75th floor, more than half of the columns had yield strengths between 55 ksi and 70ksi"

    from :

    Why would he lie ?

    Furthermore he totally ignores the diff. in mass and material thickness.

    Also, Fetzer has an answer...

    So, Lawson is obiously no good.

    And for all the plane-lovers : there were none on 911.
    Please get over it.

  49. divide conquer make to look foolish.

    there were planes.

    dr griffin is a blessing.

    he is attacked to divide. he is the most important.

  50. We are not alone. We are growing in numbers.

    Kenny is immortal.

    - Aangirfan

  51. Beware the CIA-Mossad guys who post comments on blogs like this.

    Their aim is to cause trouble.

    - Aangirfan

  52. Aangirfan, why does your site censor critical comments? I had 3 comments not make it through your censors in the past couple of days. Your aim is clear.

  53. Thats what I thought "C" you fucking coward. I see you are including the Mossad in your hodge podge more often now though. Yeah, better re-build that cred right? Before you go back to blaming the Brits and Americans(bastards no doubt but NOT the head of the snake-that would be Israel) for everything of course.

  54. Anon 7:13;


    A.a.n.g.i.r.f.a.n. is trying to build up its credibility again by including more israel/Mossad material of late.

    Ms."C" and company MUST be coming out of Tel Aviv.

    Their comment: beware of CIA/Mossad types at this kind of blog was a laugh in all our faces.

    Eat shit you zionists! Go fuck yourselves and then burn in hell group "Aangirfan" - you're outed!

  55. Is that anon wanker still declaring he's been censored? God spare us. You said the same thing at my poetry blog even though your stupid fat-head comments were right there. And there you were with the same charge at Aang's the other day and equally as wrong! You're not just disinfo but you're crap at it. You dim-witted incompetent. I guess if they pay peanuts they get monkeys.

    Anyway monkey boy, after I asked you to make a comment, any comment, on a long list of satanist pedophocracy take-your-pick, and you chose to run away, I'm calling you as a paedophile disinfo spook. You got the game, you may as well have the name. You're not stevieb are you? Actually who gives a shit? Either way: Fuck Off Kiddy Raper.

  56. Sorry Kenny, back to the topic which, groan, seems to be no-planes again. Did anyone see those vids of Scott Forbes over at WRH yesterday? I've seen them before but I thought I'd watch them again.

    For those scratching their heads, Forbes is the English IT guy who told of the 'unprecedented' power-down that required him to spend the entire weekend before 911 in at the WTC. As soon as the towers came down he smelt a rat and rang the cops, the media, everyone he could think of to tell them that there was something suspicious about the power-down and it had to be connected. And every single man-jack of them ignored him utterly. He was off message and the bloc-media wouldn't give him the time of day.

    So! Any takers for him as disinfo? Anyone? No?

    Okay, so why did he say that after the first whump, with him standing at his living room window watching WTC1 smoking away, that he saw the second plane fly in? Why did he say that?

    You can't pretend he's some variation of the Harley Guy. The entire media ignored him, remember. He was utterly off-message and they didn't want to know him. Furthermore it was the absolute least of everything he had to say - half a sentence and it's gone. What sort of crummy disinfo meme is that?

    Now, is this the bit where the no-planers switch their attack from saying that "the planes were inserted into the TV footage in real time" to their other eat-their-cake-and-have-it-too standby-argument of 'it was holograms'?

    The problem with a split argument like that is that it has to be one or the other. Either it was holograms which were visible both to witnesses and cameras, or the planes were inserted into the footage of otherwise blue sky with the eye-witnesses having nothing to see. It can't be both.

    So which was it? The only case I've seen made here was for digitally inserted 3D elements. Which would make Scott Forbes, and every other eye-witness a liar. And if you do switch now to holograms it does tend to mean that everything that's been proffered here as evidence of digital insertion is a load of guff with you as credulous gits.

    Go on - start proffering us evidence of holograms. I dare ya. I double dare ya! Do it!

    Here's a thought: imagine I'm a cop (an honest one for the sake of the argument) and you're Mr. Nope Laner, the witness who testifies it couldn't have been the perp because he drives a silver SUV and you clearly saw a red lamborghini. Then when we find there isn't a single red lamborghini in the whole country, you say it was a green Ferrari. At what point do I start to wonder if you weren't in fact in cahoots with the crims? Is it sooner, or later?

    Meanwhile back in the reality-based community (hi boys and girls), we're stuck with a choice. Are you people just credulous, or some variety of bought-and-paid-for bullshit?

    It's not a pretty choice is it? Honest people should pick the former. It's not the end of the world - you just say you were wrong like I did with peak oil and global warming. You fell for it, but who knew? It all seemed quite convincing at the time. No biggie.

    And for the low-rent professionals here's your smart-money bet: Just quietly skulk off like that worthless fucking kiddy raper did at Aang's.

    Seeya arseholes and fingers crossed your bosses don't decide you're not worth the money and have you whacked.

    Ha! Just joking. It's not like you're an incompetent who has three names and spends all his time at conspiracy blogs railing at the government or anything.

    Oh wait... um, never mind, perhaps they'll pick someone else? Repeat after me: I am not worth more dead than alive. I am not worth more dead than alive etc. etc.

  57. Hey nobody, the thing about the eye witness testimony is that it is literally all over the place on 9/11, in NYC, at the Pentagon, and Shanksville. There're so many different stories, they get exaggerated, drug out, spun in the media, ect. It's really not a very reliable source of information anyways, because it's subject to manipulation, lapse of memory, human error, witness intimidation, and even out right planted "witnesses". I hope everyone knows that all the "witnesses" calling into CNN and FOX News on 9/11 were corporate executives connected to the big media companies, i.e. planted "witnesses" with their story all scripted and ready to go. The BBC chick messed up about WTC7, but it was a successful operation. There are multiple instances of outright plants put in front of the camera on 9/11 with the official story coming right out of their mouth once the towers collapsed.

    Have you seen September Clues and read some of their research? Have you read these perspectives:

    Does none of that make sense? I find it quite convincing.

    Either way, there is absolutely no evidence of any Boeing 767s (Flight 11 and 175) or Boeing 757s (Flight 77 and 93) crashing anywhere on 9/11 at any of the sites. Literally, zero evidence. There's planted evidence, and made up stories. I've often said that everything about 9/11 is a complete fraud, including many of the videos, victims, "hijackers", and planes. And it's true.

    I think this is an important aspect of 9/11, and really don't see what's so controversial about it. The planes crashing into the buildings and the people jumping out of the buildings are the biggest PSYOP aspect of 9/11. And it appears to be completely made up.

    Ultimately though, all I care about is arresting these Zionist assholes who did 9/11 ASAP. As a movement we need to move on from all this name calling bullshit. If you want to rationally discuss an aspect of something, it's not "disinfo" because you don't totally agree. I think we're all smart enough to figure out who's pushing bullshit and who's not. For instance, Aangirfan has a great blog. No he/she/them don't talk about the Jews all the time, but they're putting out interesting information for you and others to consider and make their own minds up about. And even if Aangirfan was a "disinfo" agent from Tel Aviv, who gives a fuck? That ain't stoppin' you from doing something about this shitstorm we're in. Half the people talkin' shit here are Anonymous anyways.

    If anyone wants to seriously discuss this, feel free to respond. Simple, "no planers disinfo" will not suffice. And just to clarify: I'm not saying there were no planes on 9/11. I am saying that there is absolutely no evidence of Boeing 757s or 767s crashing ANYWHERE (Pentagon, WTC 1 & 2, Shanksville) on 9/11, and that the contention that these types of airplanes could perform the feats described by the 9/11 Commission and others is psychically impossible. Also, there is absolutely no proof of any Arab Muslim terrorists hijacking any planes on 9/11, and that the entire scenario is simply ridiculous and implausible.

    Did a remote controlled drone or military plane built by Zakheim fly into the buildings? Did a missile strike? Was there simply explosions in the buildings? Could it have been a combination of these scenarios?

    These are the questions we should be asking I think.

  58. nobody, you dumbass, I was not the anon that commented at your blog, Ive never even been to your blog. I WAS the one who was censroed by "aangirfan" numerous times though. I agree about no planes though, its clearly disinfo.

  59. Hey Kenny,..John Friend: "Did a remote controlled drone or military plane built by Zakheim fly into the buildings? Did a missile strike? Was there simply explosions in the buildings? Could it have been a combination of these scenarios?"


    Take your pick, refit it for a remote controlled crash derby and use isolated airfields to wheels-off Plane A to pitch into the target. It's easy John, digitally co-ordinating all those witnesses with the random video-tapes by tourists and the yids video-taping and high-fiving - HIGH-FIVING! WHAT THE FUCK WERE THEY HIGH-FIVING???? If they couldn't see anything, why the fucking pantomime? So, you're saying they got caught video-taping NOTHING?! Possibly exposing the truth of the real culprits, WHY!?

    The no planer stuff is compelling and for about 2 minutes I was scratching my head, then I remembered the fiasco's I was involved in as a soldier, and we were like little automatons, all keen to do the right thing and sometimes things just turn to shit. Nobby is right on the money with his KISS theory Keep It Simple Stupid - it never is and we need to focus on the path of least residence when planning a barbecue here in Oz. No goat's cheese and salmon cavatini, just chops and bangers mate, the odd steak for the meat-lovers and fried onions. Then watch us run out of gas five minutes into the Barby.

    I do agree that we should get over this BS debate and focus on bombing the shit out of israhell! Haaaargh!


    Free Palestine, with every purchase!


  60. Oh and "nobody" you talk about pedophilia almost as much as "aangirfan" does. No wonder you defend him so hard. You are projecting with all that pedo talk obviously. Creepy.

  61. Hey Kenny,..."the path of least residence" WTF? Path of least resistance; I hope everyone saw that and auto delete/obliqued the relevant word.



    Jeannon Kralj says:
    August 13, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    Just discovered all these wonderful videos today. So far have only watched three of them. I am a happy camper. Much video to imbibe here.

    I particularly likeed when you said much of the 9-11 script was taken straight from the War of the Worlds script, showing Mineta testifying “it’s fifty miles out…” etc. compared to a news announcer using almost the exact phrasing narrating the War of the Worlds. I have always thought that that testimony of Norman Minetta was totally bogus, knowing that there really was no plane approaching the Pentagon. Also, ostensibly Minetta’s testimony was devastating to Dick Cheney’s testimony to the 9-11 Commission, and yet Minetta retires from his years of stellar service to Americans and is rewarded with the Mineta Transportation Institute in San Jose, CA. This for the guy whose testimony called Dick Cheney a liar. Something does not compute!

    Also liked the two quick takes of Dr. Steven Jones saying something like…

    “Of course we know that planes hit the World Trade Center Towers.”

    Like how Dr. Reynolds laughed at this and said “What planes?” People need to keep in mind that the whole Steven Jones / Richard Gage / Keven Ryan et al. gang have the underlying solid assumption that there were planes that crashed into buildings and that there were Islamic hijackers and that even though of late they are selling the “controlled demolition” idea, they solidly assume that 9-11 was NOT an inside job


    “We have SOLID evidence of thermite.” (His emphasis was on the word “solid” as if to convey his impeccable scientific study and findings. Hogwash.)

  63. Morgan Reynolds was one of the earliest attempts to hijack the 9/11 truth movement and drive it into the ground. This Bush appointee was all over Fox and other MSM outlets selling his bullshit. That right there should tell you something.

  64. There were planes - on the video overlay.

    Here my 2 cents:

    Of the four planes hijacked by remote control takeover three were landed. The fourth got shot out of the sky by fighter jet pilots not in the loop about the entire 9/11 charade before it could be remote control landed.

    A drone hawk filled with barrels of jetfuel trigged to ignite on impact hit WTC 1 a strike coincidently 'capured' by the Nade brothers.

    A missile hit WTC2. All the Boeing jet 'amateur' videos were computer overlay.

    The 5 dancing Mossad agents were celebrating two physical hits on the WTC - but neither were boeings.

    A missile hit the pentagon.

    The fourth plane shot out of the sky by a airforce defence squad not in the loop was intended for WTC7.

    The zionist PTB dithered all day how to demolish WTC7 because their physical crash cover story lay spread out over 6 miles on the ground. The demolition of WTC7 was rewired from top down dread-lock to bottom up classic.

    WTC7 is unexplainable - so no one in the Rothschild directed PTB mention it at all.

    WTC7 is their Achille's heel.

    So 1500 engineers and architects and about 1% of all Americans are now asking: How in the world did WTC7 come down?

    The answer we get is: Silence.

    The silence will not hold for very much longer. From that one thread comes loose the whole zionist Rothschild plan for a NWO.

    Not many people are okay with the plan. More and more people are in fact waking up.

    When the procent hits 5 there will be a tipping point in the zeitgeist of America.

    I long for that day.

  65. So they were gonna use a plane for WTC7 but nothing else? Huh? I think Flight 93 was clearly meant for WTC7 but the whole rest of your scenario seems needlessly complicated. Dov Zakheim knows how the PLANES were flown. Or you could let him and his zionist scumfuck brethren off the hook by claming there were no planes. No thanks.

  66. veritas, what's up man? Thanks for an intelligent reply!

    First off, I don't know what those scum bags were filming on 9/11. What we need to do is re-arrest those assholes and perform an extraordinary rendition and ship these Israeli spies down under so you can get us some answers mate!! We'll give you 48 hours to do whatever the hell you have to, so they better come clean or it ain't going to be pretty for them!! LOL!

    But seriously, I don't know what they were filming, and I don't think anyone does either (except for these guys and their handlers back in Tel Aviv). I've heard people speculate they may have been assisting the drone hit it's target? Or maybe they were just "documenting the event" just like they said they were? Either way, them filming the attacks does not mean a Boeing 767 crashed into the WTC towers 1 and 2. And that is my primary point: the official conspiracy theory alleges Boeing 767s crashed into the buildings, but there is absolutely no evidence to support this contention, it's physically impossible, and the videos showing this alleged airplane crash have been proven by numerous sources to be fraudulent and faked. This is significant if you ask me.

    Any rational observer of Morgan Reynolds' work understands that the man has been completely smeared and character assassinated (much like Dr. Wood, Dr. Fetzer, and others engaging in these controversial areas of research regarding 9/11). Reynolds has done extremely valuable work for the 9/11 research community.

    As for Flight 93 being shot down en route to hitting WTC 7....well, that's an interesting theory, but like I've said, there is ZERO evidence of any Boeing 757 crashing anywhere in Shanksville, PA on 9/11. Just like there is ZERO evidence of any Boeing 767s crashing into the WTC towers and ZERO evidence of a Boeing 757 crashing into the Pentagon. It's all a made up cover story, which has been proven to be aerodynamically and physically impossible!!

    So bottom line: we don't know exactly what happened on 9/11, but we do know Boeing 767s or 757s were not used in the attacks at any of the sites. At least there is no available evidence to support that contention put forth by the government (and by many hear it seems...). EVERYTHING about 9/11 is a fraud folks.

  67. a couple of months back it was announced on MSM that 911 victims families will be suing some middle east country for allowing hijackers transit prior to 911...

    this is just part of the psyop to 'prove' that the victims, hijackers and planes ever existed

  68. a false flag is not an attack.
    a psyop is not an attack
    a media hoax is not an attack

  69. there are two dominant theories here

    Israel did it with some kind of planes and explosives


    Israel did it with CGI planes on TV and explosives

    we are 50% home

    the second is easier to prove...

    just arrest

    rick leventhal
    aaron brown
    bryant gumble
    the president of CNN, FOX, BBC etc etc etc

    wire them up to polygraphs

    who will do the arresting if cops, FBI etc are in on the crime?

  70. See, this is the point of the no planes/media tv fakery diversion. Arrest Aaron Brown? And Bryant Gumble? No.

    Arrest Silverstein,Jerome Hauer,Dominic Suter,Dov Zakheim,Giuliani,Cheney,5 "documenting the event" Mossad agents and GW bridge agents,Frank Lowy etc.

    "No planes" renders the roles of many of those names above meaningless and/or impossible. Which again is the whole point.

  71. I believe Rothschild did it through Mossad and the direct, full cooperation of US secret services.

    And...the ziocons in power - mostly jewish but also some christians - new about/concocted the plan under the auspicies of Rothschild and his NWO international zionist bankers - again mostly jewish but also some christians.

    1) Zionists are at fault, not jews.
    2) Using support of cast lead as a guide, about 94% of jewish israelis are zionists.
    3) Mossad did a lot of the actual planting and wiring of explosives, but the US secret services effected air stand-downs, and tons of 9/11 background support work. Mossad is equally guilty as the US for carrying out 9/11.

    Rothschild decreed 9/11, Mossad and US secret services did his bidding as a kick off to the beginning of the zionist NWO.

    Isn't the above more important than planes/no planes?

  72. Alan Hart gave a speech on his book;


    on September 1, 2011 in Freiburg, Germany.

    The article and full text of his speech is at Veterens Today:

  73. This is an excellent article on 9/11:

    Israel Did 9/11 - All The Proof


    Figuring out exactly how 9/11 was done is the work of crime investigators or conspiracy hobbyists who will endlessly go on discussing and debating every minuscule and intricate detail of the event to no avail. It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that two 110 story buildings and a 47 story steel skyscraper plummeting to the ground at nearly free-fall speed requires the assistance of explosives. All you need is two eyes that can see and a brain that thinks to come to that sound conclusion. This is why it is of my opinion that more emphasis should be placed on the "who" instead of the "how". It should be obvious to anyone that discovering who did 9/11 is infinitely more important than discovering how they did it.



    Bin Laden had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11.

    The Aangirfan post is disinformation.

  75. Anon@1:03-"The Aangirfan post is disinformation."

    What else is new. And they censor more than Yahoo.

  76. Okay, so there's two anons hitting various blogs with off-topic, shit-slinging, pointless comments claiming they've been censored when in no such thing has happened. Wow you and that guy should hook up.

    "Hey, are you anonymous? Wow, me too! We have so much in common."


    And this is fantastic -

    'Oh and "nobody" you talk about pedophilia almost as much as "aangirfan" does. No wonder you defend him so hard. You are projecting with all that pedo talk obviously. Creepy.'

    That's word perfect mate. You are textbook.

    In the avalanche of evidence Aang provides, you have nothing to say apart from 'it's all in your head'. Pedophocracy disinfo merchants are so fucking predictable. I gave you a list of twenty things, any one of which would, for regular right-thinking people, elicit a single response, that being, 'Holy Shit! I had no idea!'

    Paedophile disinfo merchants on the other hand never bat an eyelid. They been there, done that, got the thousand yard stare to go with it. Mate, you are the walking dead. In your head is a blank space and the only thing that makes you feel alive is fucking children.

    Comment again, I dare ya. You are so zombified and so fucked up that you have no idea how real people think anymore. I lay a trap for you, I even tell you it's a trap and all you can do is walk straight into it.

    One more time: say something, anything that wavers from a paedophile disinfo line. And to make things really crystal clear - This is a trap. Do you get it? Yeah? But guess what? It doesn't matter that I warned you since you cannot stray from the paedophile line. You can only walk on a pre-programmed path even when you know the trap is there.

    You fuckers are so stupid and so predictable it's almost funny. Except for the bit about you raping kids.

    And if punters out there think this is a weird conversation have a read of this. It's longish but regardless you'll see a textbook example of what I'm talking about above. In that case the paedophile disinfo merchant, one stevieb, precisely fulfills the description of zombie who cannot stray from the path.

    Hmm... I'm going to front page this over at my place. And professional kiddy rapers are welcome to come on down. Be warned: you will be on the menu.

  77. Because "nobody" is your real name right you ananoymous as well jackass? Get over yourself "nobody". And again witht he unsolicited talk about raping kids. What is with you? Nobody else brought it up, you did. Do you know what it looks like, you continually bringing up pedophilia out of nowhere? You have to know what this makes you look like.

  78. Sorry Kenny, I know that was off topic but these fuckers (whose disinfo programme is easily as big as hasbara effort) walk around with such impugnity, when truth be known, they're as obvious as Ed Begley Jr playing the invisible man.

    Otherwise, on the topic that no one asked for but we're going to get whether we want it or not, (that would be no-planes) the comments here have been tremendously instructive. That too becomes clear. Thanks John. I'm front-paging that at my place too.

    Which to do first? Hmm... maybe the kiddy rapers.

    Anyway off I go now.

    ciao ciao


  79. Don't forget to take your meds.

  80. As long as the plane-huggers and no-plane-nutters are pointing fingers at each other they won't be pointing fingers at us.

    This is good, very, very good.

    Maybe they'll exhaust themselves fighting each other so we'll never have to admit hthat we did 9/11.

  81. Whew ... I've been off working the last few days and and come back to find so many comments that it's well, overwhelming. So many opinions, so little time.

    I want to especially thank John, Veritas, nobody, no more myths, AnonymousSpeechFree, Jody, musique, Agoy, chuckyman, Suzan, joe anon, aang, etc. for having screen names. It would make it a little easier to keep up if everyone else did the same and not just use anonymous. Seems easy to me. Just asking.

    Anyway, many good points made. Some of the comebacks were justified.

    @ 3:26 PM, that sounds about right.

    @ 7:42 AM and John @ 9:50 AM reflect many of my thoughts. Some kind of aircraft or missiles used, not the official Boeings, but also faked videos used to enhance the official story.

    As far as flight 93 goes I'll repeat my story on that. On Sept. 12, 2001 I listened in on a co-worker's speakerphone while he talked to his brother-in-law who was in the air force. The airman said the word spreading like wildfire throughout the service was that 93 was shot down by a pilot from either North or South Dakota. He was excited about it and said they had done their job and what was being told on TV about 93 was bullshit.

    That doesn't mean that it was actually 93. Probably an RC substitute or possibly a missile fired into the ground.

    I've never been able to confirm that the 'rumor' was as widespread among the air force as the guy said it was because I never talked to anyone else who was in the air force at that time. Still, there were elements of truth to it and an early confirmation that everything we were being told by the media was a lie.

  82. Why does it matter if we have screen names? So bullies like nobody and veritas can hold it against us and act like the assholes they are? No thanks. They are basically just as anonymous as myself, I suppose I could choose an anonymous name like them but don't see the point. Its about the message not the messenger and I find that the names taint the message for some.

  83. Heres a question for the no planers, one that Ive already asked indirectly-what role did Dov Zakheim play in 9/11 if there were no planes? And what role did ICTS airport security play if there were no planes? Thats 2 crucial links to Israel that go up in smoke if we buy into the "no planes at WTC" stuff isnt it? It just looks like a desperate ploy by the perps to shift the blame to "the media"(who do you even start with? Bryant Gumbel? Really?) and away from the names above. We know who did it and it wasn't Matt fucking Lauer.

  84. Hey Kenny,...anon @7:25, it's not about BEING anonymous, it's about recognition, the only reason you can call me a bully is because you recognize the author, yes, I do write a bunch of shyte sometimes, yes I can be overzealous and yes, I am not afraid to be recognized for my errant comments, however, if I or anyone else does get it right, credit where it is due. ( As for some bellicose pre-pubescent wanker from 'Club Mohel' slinging shit my way. I have my PTSD demons to contend with, I don't need your un-informed 2 cents worth).

    Passionate about the way things are, hello? I mean, Libya? Are you kidding me? Paedophiles running the Courts and judiciary, creeping through the halls of Governance, all of them yids or shabbat goyim working for the tribe of bankers and child-molesters - these are the issues. Mum and Dad don't give a fuck about 911, we need to expose the tribe closer to their doorsteps. Freddy Kruger caused them to create a boom in the sales of Home security devices. 911 truthers cause their eyes to glaze over.

    911 is a done thing people. Child-molester (got Talmudic turpitude?) is synonymous with the synagogue and yes the tribe of self-chosen state clearly in their satanic scriptures that they believe they should rule the world and are now and always have been working towards that goal - if you control the world which the yids do, then you are responsible for its management - the world is a fucking mess and I blame the management - the jews, who are not actually Judahites they are yiddish khazars and various other bastard occult identities throughout history, going back to their origination through an unholy congress between wiccans and Nephilim. (and you call me nutz!)

    So, yes the yids are to blame because they fucking own everything of any consequence or influential import - and please, no-one bang on about bilderberg, NWO, neocons, zio-whatevers, jesuits, freemasons - useful idiots, etc. They are smokescreens. It's all the tribe and they fuck everything because they are greedy destructive blood-ritual monsters...

    Oh, welcome home Kenny, yeah, the place is a mess, the goldfish died, sorry mate, we crashed your car and the Police have attended at least twice, maybe more I passed-out sometime back and woke up to find three anons and John Friend standing over me, by the way the neighbors hate you, they pushed a note under the door.
    Fortunately we didn't kill anyone and no-one O-D'd.

    And I'm sure those stains will come out of your bed-covers. I'll be back later to help clean up, some chick gave me a yellow note from the local Clinic, apparently I have an appointment.

    Free Palestine!


    P.S. Don't go in the Pool. There's a guy coming round later to drain it and disinfect the sides.

  85. Satan-worshipping child molesters?

    Sounds like an episode of the Geraldo Rivera show.

  86. Good stuff veritas! LMAO! I was trying to hand you another beer!!

    And yes, it is all about the Jews. Kev Boyle said it best in my opinion:

    Yes they did 9/11. We don't know how everything was done, but we know they did it through their outright agents (the fuckers arrested on 9/11!!), in conjunction with their puppets in the U.S. government, media and private sector.

    As for Flight 93 in Shanksville.....interesting story kenny. From the research I've looked into (I'm mostly relying on Killtown, Fetzer, and Pilots for 9/11 Truth here), there is literally no evidence that any Boeing 757 crashed. It seems as if there is no evidence of ANY plane crashing on 9/11 at Shanksville actually. I can't remember who said it exactly, but an investigator there said that it looked like they bulldozed a few areas and dumped a bunch of garbage around in an attempt to make it plausible Flight 93 crashed there. The military shooting it down doesn't jive either to me, but maybe. It's a mystery.

    Sorry we wrecked the place by the way kenny, it wasn't my idea....

  87. Just wanted to add my two (or more) cents on a few things:

    The commemorations had the feel of celebration and sick worship to me, and I avoided coverage. The few images I saw of war criminals walking that ground made me angry.

    The plane/no plane issue is troubling to me in the sense that I have believed that what we saw on TV that day was real. It was live television with witnesses, etc, etc. The thought that the transmissions were altered etc reaches a level of such diabolical evil it is hard to comprehend. Bad enough a false flag based on what we saw. For the video images to be altered is truly horrifying; however, the idea that a power elite would not engage in such deception when they have gotten away with so much doesn't pass the smell test.

    Then I remember that the Zapruder film itself was in the possession of the CIA and may have been altered (something like a pink blob in the front of the head to show an exit wound when the back was blasted out, etc, but that is a different subject).

    And to those who think television wouldn't present doctored or altered scenes:

    "The footage of the landmarks was shot several weeks ago... digitally altered.... superimposing the fireworks over the images."

    If television provides deceptive images for "entertainment," what makes you think they would hesitate over something more important? BBC calling the drop of WTC7 a half-hour before it went down is proof a script was being read.

    I then turn to the videos from that day. The most famous is the Today show tape where the plane appears in the corner (as if out of nowhere) and takes what seems to be diving action at WTC 2. That is contradicted by a lower shot showing what looks like a different plane coming in on a flatter and lower trajectory. The dancing Mossads shot from across the river looks like a big black shape was drawn on the damn thing. And years later an amateur video appeared with the actual collision and explosion mysteriously cut (the Bob and Bri video)appeared.

    In this sense I believe as you do that anon@7:42 has sketched out a very plausible scenario for what really happened. I certainly can see missiles having been used, and even some of the alleged eyewitness testimony is vague regarding planes (certainly regarding the Pentagon). Only one thing gives me pause: What are those holes in WTC 5 and 6, and how were so many cars smashed and burned so far away?

    You have it right, Kenny, and that is we are all searching for the truth and it is the who not the how that is important....

    (continued next comment)

  88. (continued from above comment)

    On Ron Paul no one has been a more vociferous advocate for the guy; however, I am also troubled by some of the same things you are. The minimum wage thing shows a disconnect, and I'm not for a return to the gold standard either. Most Americans couldn't afford much if anything in the way of gold, and the same bandits who stole the paper money own the gold. What we need is a form of colonial scrip or adherence to the constitution where the government coins the money supply at no interest. Of course, we have seen what happens to leaders who do or attempt to do such things (Lincoln, Hitler, JFK). Sadly, at times I feel Ron is just part of the diversion. Where has all that money bomb campaign loot gone? Gets us behind a "savior" and put our energies into that and avoid a true people's revolt? I'm not saying politics and elections are unimportant; however, I've tired of them after five years of switching sides and changing control with nothing changing (things in fact getting worse) as the agenda is endlessly advanced.

    One last thing: I noticed that "CIA-Duh" really blew it this last weekend. They "missed" a golden opportunity! Want to really make Americans mad and get back on board with endless war? Attack football! But then lots of money would be lost for certain parties, huh? Hmmmm.

    This lengthy comment has been a thank you and tribute to you, sir.

  89. Rocker you make a number of extremely astute observations regarding video fakery on 9/11. Thank you!!

    I've often pointed out the fact that the Zapruder film is a hoax, and that the PTB have the capability to alter live video feeds and broadcasts. Further, these sorts of psychological operations are a staple of the intelligence agencies and military. So, put two and two together, and you're left with the conclusion that video fakery was very likely involved on 9/11. It is a very rational conclusion to come to, especially after looking at the videos themselves and September Clues' research (among others). We get distracted by labeling this sort of reasoning as the "no planes" theory, when in fact all I'm saying is that the hijacked Boeing 767 scenario laid out by the PTB is completely ludicrous and fraudulent. And yes, the videos were faked IMO.

    As for Ron Paul, it was funny, the crowd was booing him at the debate the other night because he was criticizing US foreign policy and asking why it's in our interest to spend all our money killing millions of people all over the world. Jeez, everything is staged on the Talmud-vision (good word Greg, wherever you are!). Thank god I don't have a one.

  90. ttp://

    Scott Creighton,

    You all fully correct in your evaluation.

    The new world order is at its base a group of zionist international bankers lead by Rothschild issuing and controlling all money and thus all governments of the world.

    We are now in the end game of this plan. Rothschild and his oligarch bankers own and control 193 private central banks out of 197 countries.

    The present world economic crisis is being fomented to enable TPTB to be asked by all governments to implement a singular one world currecy. Once that is achieved the game will be over. The oligarchs and the serfs will be entrenched ad infinitum.

    The middle class will cease to exist and 0.01% of the world will own and control 100% of the world's wealth.

    "You are not in the club, you and I are not in the club." George Carlin

    If we are not in the club then we are destined in the near future to be serfs. That is the game plan of the zionist internation bankers.


    A warning to internet truthtellers in the form of two murdered people hanging from a bridge in Mexico with a handwritten sign beside them denouncing truthtelling on blogs about drug cartels.

    My spider senses tell me this is actually the zionist establishment getting really rattled by all the internet blog truth coming out about them and their evil work.

    The hanging got MSM (CNN) coverage and looks to be a scare tactic for truthseekers and tellers to stop exposing the truth about zionism, 9/11, etc.

    "A coward dies a thousand deaths - the brave man only one."

  92. Dear Clueless IN THE HIGH DESERT,

    Your Article titles are sounding more and more alternative zionist MSM.

    "...whites girls...daddy..."

    All your propaganda for the NWO global warming shite doesn't help me to go to your blog either.

    Just sayin' you have questionable cred.

  93. I like "homeless in the high desert". I question the cred of someone who uses the Alex Jonesian term "NWO" which is a nice little obfuscation.

  94. I like tasty desserts not clueless deserts.

  95. saw interesting pic in a magazine re pentagon and plane strike at 9-11.

    inside c-ring, a hole similar to original hole on outside e-ring - approximately 16' diameter.

    how could a 757 penetrate through 3 wings of the pentagon? impossible.

    not a 757. not a global hawk as some posit. this was a missile.

  96. Speaking of "tv fakery", if the following video of WTC7 is not in fact faked it is perhaps the single most damning piece of visual evidence of conrolled demolition yet:

    Holy shit. Does anyone know where this video came from? Today was the first time I saw it myself.


    Israeli-Greek defense pact invoked versus Turkish naval and air movements

    DEBKAfile September 15, 2011, 10:51 AM (GMT+02:00)

    Israel and Greece have invoked the mutual defense pact they signed secretly only 12 days ago in the light of heavy Turkish sea and air movements in the eastern Mediterranean...this was decided in a long nocturnal phone conversation Wednesday night Sept. 14 between the Israeli and Greek prime ministers, Binyamin Netanyahu and George Papandreou, and at Israel's expanded cabinet of eight, which was called into session over the Turkish threat to its off-shore oil and gas rigs.

    The Greek Prime Minister added to the information recorded so far on Turkish fleet movements in the Aegean and Mediterranean Seas. He was particularly concerned by the observation flights suddenly increased in the past 48 hours over the Greek island of Kastelorizo in the southeast Mediterranean just two kilometers from the Turkish coast. Those flights are escorted by Turkish combat jets.

    Athens fears a Turkish attack on the island, whose population is fewer than 1,000, and an attempt to damage or seize it. Israel suspects that a Turkish attack on the Greek island will be the signal for Turkish military aggression against its oil and gas platforms located in the Mediterranean between Israel and Cyprus. Papandreou said the Turks are capable of surprise attacks on additional Greek islands near the Turkish coast.

    Ankara would be acting on the pretext that Israel and Cyprus have no right to mark out and exploit the gas and oil zones of the eastern Mediterranean – a fuel-rich region known as Block 12 – without the consent of Turkish Cyprus (the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus – TRNC).

    Turkey also backs Lebanon's complaint that Israel is robbing it of its natural resources. Talks between Lebanon and Cyprus to resolve this issue broke down. Beirut refuses any discussion with Israel.

    Neither Jerusalem nor Athens has disclosed in what way they have invoked the new defense pact.

  98. in the first stage, Israeli navy and air forces are to be posted at Greek Mediterranean bases. The two intelligence agencies are already sharing input.

    Up until now, Israel could only respond to a Turkish threat from its own borders. With a presence at Greek military bases, Israel will be able to operate from the rear of Turkish forces in the event of an attack by those forces in the Mediterranean.

    Monday, Sept. 12, Ankara dictated conditions for Israel to obey in order to keep its navy afloat free of Turkish aggression:

    1. Israel vessels are prohibited from taking action against Turkish ships heading for the Gaza Strip. Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan has declared "null and void" the UN report confirming the legality of Israel's blockade of Gaza.

    2. Israeli warships crossing the 12-mile line bounding its territorial waters will be challenged by Turkish warships, which are instructed to approach them to within 100 meters and "disable their weapons."

    This threat covers not only shipping bound for Gaza but also Israel's oil and gas drilling platforms which are more than 60 miles out to sea.

    Israel's political and military spokesmen have been trying hard to downplay the Turkish menace. On Wednesday, Sept. 14, they brushed aside reports of Turkish naval and air movements in the eastern Mediterranean. After the cabinet of eight's meeting, the official line was that Israel is practicing "restraint in contrast to Turkish wildness" and they should be given time to cool down.

    In any case, the US and NATO were closely monitoring the crisis Ankara is generating with Israel, Greece and Cyprus, and won't let it degenerate into Turkish military action.

    But both Israel and Greece appear to know better: They decided to invoke their mutual defense pact – not before obtaining a green light from Washington – because they believe the Turkish threats indicated by its military movements are real and tangible.


    Either this is 100% made-up sympathy attempt disinformation by Israel because Turkey has said the truth about Israel's disgusting behaviour toward Turkish nationals and Palestinians,

    or, if the report is genuine Israel is going to try to get Greeks to fight the Turks. Perish the thought that Israel's famous IDF would ever actually have to battle indiviuals with guns (grin).

  99. well...if all is true, and it was all made transparent on purpose and they monitor the web to find groups of people that, for any reason, will not believe the official story, for purpose of rounding them up and put them in camps or worse...

    then this might very well be the end-time, the point of no return, the point in time when only the non thinking, the media controlled and the plain fools will inherit the Earth, to live on and reproduce, to be and raise slaves to serve the power elite for ever and ever...


    in case of camps btw. some questions arise that make me worry; for sure i hope to be put in a camp with like minded i.e. the no-plane camp and in the latter case ...who's going to share the bunk with Jim Fetzer ?

    Might as well discuss that one now, just for peace of mind.

  100. Prospective passengers for Simon Shack's CGI planes should, before getting on board—

    Watch this:

    Simon Shack Lies 101

    And read this:



    The internet video series “September Clues” offers many apparent anomalies in the 9/11 television coverage which could be perceived to be evidence of ‘TV Fakery’. None of these alleged ‘proofs’ has been proven conclusively to be an artefact of ‘TV Fakery’. That quite a number of possible artefacts of ‘TV Fakery’ are presented together, does not mean that they add up to any kind of certain proof. Each alleged ‘proof’ has a far more rational and likely explanation.
    In order to declare that the steel building is being sliced by aluminium, one must first rule out that there is nothing assisting
    the planes’ entry into the Towers. Obvious possibilities include:
    1. The planes were “rigged” in some way to assist their entry into the Towers.
    2. The Towers were “rigged” in some way to assist the entries of the planes.
    3. Both the Towers and the planes were “rigged” in order to assist the entry of the planes.
    One cannot jump from the apparent physical impossibility of aluminium slicing steel, to the conclusion that this event did not take place as depicted in the videos and photographs, and that therefore this is evidence that the videos and photographs were faked. You can't draw the conclusion of No Planes/’TV Fakery’ on the grounds of physical impossibility without first ruling out that the planes or the towers - or both - were rigged in some way.

    Also of interest:

    9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts

  101. Dear No More Myths,

    The Simon Shack Lies 101 video was WEAK SAUCE. Whoever made that video rebutted one tiny bit of what's presented in September Clues (the helicopter 'PAT'), and rather unconvincingly at that.

    Your second source is much better. I agree with this:

    "One cannot jump from the apparent physical impossibility of aluminium slicing steel, to the conclusion that this event did not take place as depicted in the videos and photographs, and that therefore this is evidence that the videos and photographs were faked. You can't draw the conclusion of No Planes/’TV Fakery’ on the grounds of physical impossibility without first ruling out that the planes or the towers - or both - were rigged in some way."

    I agree with that, which is why I always try to clarify that what I'm specifically saying is that there is NO EVIDENCE AT ALL OF ANY BOEING 757 (PENTAGON & SHANKSVILLE) OR 767 (WTC 1 & 2) CRASHING ANYWHERE ON 9/11.

    And that's where this whole "no planes" theory gets us off track. I'm not saying there were "no planes"; I am saying there were no Boeing 757s (Flight 77/93) or 767s (Flight 11/175) involved in 9/11. At least there has been no real evidence put forth to verify that contention.

    If you want to really pursue this subject you really need to listen to Dr. Jim Fetzer's radio programs:

  102. The following Orwellian double-speak is as good a text book example as one can get.

    To summarise, the reason the US will veto the Palestian bid for statehood is to help the Palestinians to achieve statehood.

    George Orwell must be laughing his ass off where ever he is. This has got to be the most dumb-assed comment to come out of the USA ever.

    "We have taken the position we've taken because we do not believe it is ultimately in the interests of Middle East peace, of the process," said White House spokesman Jay Carney.

    "It doesn't bring the two sides closer together. It would not bring the Palestinians any closer to statehood, and we believe that it would be counterproductive to that goal."

    Again, granting the Palestinians statehood would not bring them closer to their goal of statehood.


  103. Here's what happens when one defies Israel:
    It's as easy as 1, 2, 3!
    (cue M.Jackson soundtrack)

    1. Belize recognizes Palestine Borders
    (September 9, 2011)

    2. El Salvador recognizes Palestine as independent state
    (August 25, 2011)

    3. US adds Belize, El Salvador to ‘major’ drug producing, transit countries
    (September 15, 2011)

    WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has added Belize and El Salvador to the U.S. list of “major” drug producing and transit countries.
    Wayne Madsen Report
    (September September 16, 2011)

    Israel is the Grand Patron/ Rothschild boardgame/ street gang. The CFR runs election coverage in the U.S. and the Rothschild City of London controls IT...Break free and take a 8 lb. sledge hammer to your TV as soon as possible. Feel the freedom.

  104. I believe people who say they are looking for the truth. When people say they know the truth I have to see proof. So far I have seen nothing except specutlation, sophistry, ipse dixits and eye witness testimony. If eye witness testimony was reliable then there is such a thing as bigfoot and the loch ness monster. More people are on record seeing bigfoot than there are people who saw planes crash into buildings. I saw planes crash into buildings on 911 on my tv screen. Any video producer could have faked those shots.

    I do not know what happened and I don't advocate any theory. However if it turns out there were no planes I would not be surprised.

    Planer or no planer we all look crazy. And maybe we all are. One can hope!