Saturday, August 11, 2012

Recalling Revisionist History

Just as poisoned food is sometimes recalled, occasionally a book is recalled from a publisher because it contains a further an agenda. These recalls are not the banning of the books but an attempt at correction.

Evangelical 'historian' David Barton's bookThe Jefferson Lies" is the latest example of one of these recalls. Some details are at the two links.

It's sort of funny to see a book begin recalled because book stores, home shelves and libraries are littered with many fake revisionist histories on all sorts of subjects that publishers continue to stand behind. What percentage of books dealing with politics and war history and written by the 'winners' are filled with downright lies? Who knows but in our Orwellian world the percentage is significant.

Barton's book recall comes on the heels of a couple of others where there is a whole industry set up to perpetuate myths. The holocaust sagas of Herman Rosenblat and Misha Defonseca were exposed and I suppose reluctantly taken out of publication because they were big sellers.  Here's a list of 100 more, some portrayed as fiction based on fact, others said to be fact but are really fiction, but all still being sold when most should be recalled in the interest of correction of false history. David Barton is an amateur compared to Elie Wiesel who even Obama grovels to in order to try and get jewish votes and money while Wiesel dresses him down for not being a better holocaust supporter and for not killing more of the zionist's enemies.

What's also funny is that in some countries to publish a revisionist counter to certain kinds of revisionist history is illegal and can get you thrown in jail. Just talking in public about oddities in official stories and numbers can get you locked up too. In the U.S. it's basically self-censorship for fear of how speaking on 'taboo' subjects may affect one's career. It's a strange controlled world we live in.

Thomas Jefferson was a complex and like us all, an imperfect human. That doesn't mean his history needs to be revised to fit a certain segment of today's social engineers' desires to make him fit their distorted worldview. I guess we should thank Nashville's publishing house Thomas Nelson for pulling Barton's book but in many respects it's too little too late. There won't be many other publishers to follow their lead. Not when there's money to be made and when public indoctrination through the written word is a very useful tool to keep us subservient. 


If anything can clear of the misconceptions of Jeffersonian history, it can come best from the author himself. Although Jefferson had a complex view of religion, too vast for this presentation, the following quotes provide a glimpse of how Thomas Jefferson viewed the corruptions of Christianity and religion.

Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. -Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782

What is it men cannot be made to believe! -Thomas Jefferson to Richard Henry Lee, April 22, 1786. (on the British regarding America, but quoted here for its universal appeal.)

Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787

Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination. -Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Hopkinson, March 13, 1789

They [the clergy] believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly; for I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion. -Thomas Jefferson to Dr. Benjamin Rush, Sept. 23, 1800

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptist Association, CT., Jan. 1, 1802

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes. -Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.

The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814

Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814

If we did a good act merely from love of God and a belief that it is pleasing to Him, whence arises the morality of the Atheist? ...Their virtue, then, must have had some other foundation than the love of God. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Thomas Law, June 13, 1814

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus."

-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Adrian Van der Kemp, 30 July, 1816

My opinion is that there would never have been an infidel, if there had never been a priest. The artificial structures they have built on the purest of all moral systems, for the purpose of deriving from it pence and power, revolts those who think for themselves, and who read in that system only what is really there.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Mrs. Samuel H. Smith, August, 6, 1816

You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Ezra Stiles Ely, June 25, 1819

As you say of yourself, I too am an Epicurian. I consider the genuine (not the imputed) doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome have left us. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, Oct. 31, 1819

Priests...dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight and scowl on the fatal harbinger announcing the subversions of the duperies on which they live. -Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Correa de Serra, April 11, 1820

Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him [Jesus] by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, April 13, 1820

To talk of immaterial existences is to talk of nothings. To say that the human soul, angels, god, are immaterial, is to say they are nothings, or that there is no god, no angels, no soul. I cannot reason otherwise: but I believe I am supported in my creed of materialism by Locke, Tracy, and Stewart. At what age of the Christian church this heresy of immaterialism, this masked atheism, crept in, I do not know. But heresy it certainly is. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, Aug. 15, 1820

Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. -Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822.

I can never join Calvin in addressing his god. He was indeed an Atheist, which I can never be; or rather his religion was Daemonism. If ever man worshipped a false god, he did. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823

And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerve in the brain of Jupiter. But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this most venerated reformer of human errors. -Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823

It is between fifty and sixty years since I read it [the Apocalypse], and I then considered it merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to General Alexander Smyth, Jan. 17, 1825

May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826 (in the last letter he penned)

 Although Jefferson believed in a Creator, his concept of it resembled that of the god of deism (the term "Nature's God" used by deists of the time). With his scientific bent, Jefferson sought to organize his thoughts on religion. He rejected the superstitions and mysticism of Christianity and even went so far as to edit the gospels, removing the miracles and mysticism of Jesus (see The Jefferson Bible) leaving only what he deemed the correct moral philosophy of Jesus.


  1. Man oh man, Jefferson was good, wasn't he? What happened to guys like that? Jefferson always had very profound things to say. Sort of like a certain German guy that came to power back in the 1930s... (sorry kenny, I had to)

    I've heard many of the Founding Fathers were Masons, and that the US was set up as a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy (much like the French Revolution during the same time period). That makes a lot of sense to me, but it seems clear that Jefferson was on our side.

    Check this out:

    "Jonathan Williams recorded in his LEGIONS OF SATAN, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown." Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: "Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry."

    I can't find any other verification for this, but it is right on the money, no?

    1. Holy crap, you just cant stop the Hitler love, not even for one post, can you? Still haent read Men Kampf yet though right? HAHA! You fucking joke. Fuck you and your Prothink handlers you controlled opposition toolbag.

    2. Yeeeah, that's my boy, Lil John! Remember what daddy says - drop Hitler's name at the potential recruitment sites, you make .05¢ and months supply of shamwow!

    3. Seriously, first comment right off the bat, he just cant help himself. Hitler is Jefferson now? LOL! This really speaks volumes. You're showing your hand John. Haven't your handlers taught you more tact than this? Apparently not.

    4. What? You don't love Hitler?

    5. Notice how the Zio-morons, and JIDF douchebags come out of the woodwork, John, and try to use their "Hitler" Hitler" "Nazi" "Nazi" old and tired spiel to try to discredit your statement...

      Time to go back for more training, JIDF agents of IsraHell.... You are dismissed!

    6. John has many daddies obviously, impressive!

    7. "Hitler is Jefferson now?"

      All I said was that they both had profound things to say.

    8. NorthernTruthSeeker, I didnt realize you were so naive. You have a half decent site but you do post some sloppy and ridiculous stuff from time to time so Im not shocked you fall for the Hitler/Friend psy op. Grow up. The only zio-tool here is John Friend. Who brought up HItler first you fucking idiot? Exactly.

    9. Well, the problem is there are too many bloggers are hiding behind the truth exposing facade. Deep down they are just as xenophobic & racist, like their jewish counterparts. There are hardly any differences.

    10. I'd venture to state almost ALL the commenters opposing John Friend are zio trolls.

    11. I'd venture to state almost ALL the sock puppets supporting John Friend are either zioshills. Or John Friend himself. Who is obviously a zioshill or useful idiot being manipulated by one.

    12. Anon@7:46-you are exactly right. The rhetoric they spew is so very similar to that which you hear from jewish extremists. It makes you wonder if thats not what they actually are. They can pretend they are "legit truthers" but in reality are nothing more than standard racist zionist activists on a keyboard playing a part. Anon@10:52 and "Northerntruthseeker" are probably coming to you straight out of Tel Aviv.

    13. John Fiend, ProStink & the rest bray unanimously, wondering why? 'Cause they are all stuck to each other's end human centipede style.

    14. Thanks Anonymous, 10:15 AM.

      Since you mentioned keyboard, time to play off the johnturds!

    15. Definitely anti-zionist and definitely pro-Friend, put that in your zio-pipe and smoke it!

    16. Anon@2:52. You may think you're anti-zionist. You may actually be in practice for the most part. But in falling for Friends guilt by association Prothink led disinfo show you are doing some of the zionists work for them. Seriously, look at how obvious the guy is. Look again at the comment that kicked off this thread. Seriously? You dont see what most others see there? Another thread becomes about Hitler. Because thats so productive and always relevant right? Its certainly helpful to the anti-zionist, anti-war, pro-truth causes to be associated with white supremacist Hitler obsessed race baiters like Friend right? Give me a fucking break. Its obvious who benefits from clowns like Friend. Do I really have to spell it out for you? Starts with a Z. Or J if you please.

    17. Yes, John, you started this. You don't like cluttering up the comments on your site with this kind of 'debate' but you knew what it would trigger here.

      I like unmoderated and uncensored, within reason, comments but this infighting is getting old. Whether hasbara or not, the result is the same.

      Hitler did have some good economic and other ideas but the bottom line is that the jews, the bankers and their allies beat him, Israel was created and the holohoax became an almost mandatory religion. Millions of good people died in vain. Operation Paperclip helped to form the CIA and the long list of psyops springing from that continues. etc. etc.

      Those who look up to Aryan National Socialism I challenge them to read and think about what is in the link below. I don't see this entering into the debate but there are some good points made. Why is it that only parts of Hitler's 'message' are considered relevant and not this one?

      If someone wants to argue why not do it on some of the major alternative sites instead of the minor ones? Have you read this article by Mike Adams at Natural News?

      It's a good one except he feels the need, or it's part of his task, to evoke 'gas chambers' and 'incinerators' to make a point. Call him out on his ignorance or deliberate myth perpetuation. That would be interesting.

      Anyone see the feature story leading into the Olympics on NBC last night, a Brokaw doc about Churchill, Roosevelt and the lead up to World War II? Now that was revisionist history and propaganda for a captive audience but I can't find anyone out there who's talking about that but I found it to be a relevant but minor issue.

      My point is that there are many topics for conversation besides who believes what about Hitler. Most of them more relevant for today's problems.

      In the last post a commenter used a very good word for dealing with hasbara and infighting...ignore. That's a useful technique. We should all try it more often.

    18. john Friend passes two litmus tests - 911 and the so called holocaust, and for that I salute him. I disagre about hitler. Same with zundel, who wrote a book called 'the Hitler we loved and why', a title so over the top that MSM can easily ridicule everything he says about the holocaust. (it reminds me of the charachter 'the playwight' in the movie 'the producers')
      That title even made wonder if Zundel could be contrilled opposition. ie put him through the mill with high profile trials and jail time to deter anyone from even thinking about going down that road.

      re norther truth seeker, he fails the 911 litmus test, same as video rebel without a cause

    19. Yes, kenny, I started this, simply by saying that TJ and AH had profound things to say. They did, after all, both have profound things to say, didn't they? No one even addressed my main point in that comment, of course.

      It was inevitable that this would come up, due to the nature of the trolls we're dealing with. Your last post they went on for like 7 or 8 comments before I came in and set the record straight. You weren't bitching about those clowns, but you sure seem upset with my comment here. That says a lot.

      I don't like people shitting on my blog with their BS, but obviously you do. You let a bunch of clown trolls run the show here man, and you don't take a stand when you should. You just now, finally, said something about this debate, which has been taking place for over a month now. And from what I gather, you are more on my side than the clown trolls you seem to be defending.

      You're link re veganism is quite interesting, and I think it should be discussed for sure. I don't think it's irrelevant by any means, I just haven't focused on it. Deanna Spingola has talked about it a few times on her radio program. If it's such an important topic to you, why haven't you posted about it? Or maybe you have, and I missed it?

      Either way man, I've been following your work from the very beginning, and I love what you do and totally respect you. I'll try my hardest to stay away from the comment section here for the time being. No matter what I have to say the trolls will be here on attack mode.

      Peace bro, keep fightin' the good fight.

    20. John, it's not much of a debate when it sinks into name calling. I've left the comments alone as an example of whatever people may make of them and basically have been ignoring them. Perhaps that's not exactly the best thing to do but how does one stay above the fray without deleting comments and I don't like to do that either.

      Your alliance with prothink does give some pause for concern and I think you should have known there would be fallout from it.

      I used to post things from the vegan and vegetarian point of view quite often. The subject has been deeply embedded in me for over 40 years but became less of a priority in talking about things with so much else going on. Folks either get it or they don't and I found out early on in the 70's that preaching about it doesn't work that well.

    21. Oh I love it. John is crying now because Kenny wont protect him and censor comments like he constantly does. Hilarious. Doesnt it piss you off so much that legit criticism of you is allowed to stand? Obviously it does. Sorry John, you cant control the message on other peoples sites like you do on your own.

    22. What gives you the right to call us "trolls"?

      Since I find your glorifying racial supremacy utterly deplorable and if that makes me a "troll", then I have millions of reasons to celebrate my "trollhood".

    23. "glorifying racial supremacy"

      Gee, now whose really good at that? The people that are likely pulling Johnny boys strings,directly or indirectly. I'll let you guess who.

    24. "John, it's not much of a debate when it sinks into name calling."

      Exactly, and who started the name calling from the very beginning? I have been called "disinfo" ever since I started bringing up issues relating to the planes on 9/11, and it got even worse when I started setting the record straight about Hitler. The name calling has been directed against me, and of course I have responded.

      "Your alliance with prothink does give some pause for concern and I think you should have known there would be fallout from it. "

      What "alliance" are you talking about dude? I told you exactly what happened with that whole situation, and I wasn't making it up. It's a damn good thing I didn't switch my blog over to that site, because his entire operation has been shut down by the ADL.

      Would it give you "pause for concern" if I told you that I have an "alliance" with many other bloggers and fellow truth seekers, like B'Man, Northerntruthseeker, ZCF, Azaziah, and others? What is so suspect about reaching out to like minded individuals privately?

    25. ADL=KKK=SPLC=Prothink=NewBlackPanthers=JohnFriend=Rita Katz=controlled op/useful idiots all on the same team.

      no planes at WTC disinfo=meant to absolve Zakheim and one of the most crucial links to Israel concerning 9/11.

      constant Hitler love OR hate=only helpful to one interest. Figure it out.

      And come on John, dont compare those people(Bman,Azaziah) to Prothink. Thats pretty unfair.

    26. anon @ 8:20 PM, Please do a search on NTS and Video Rebel for 9/11 and get back with us and let us know if you still think they fail the litmus test.

      John, of course B'man and NTS are allies. That goes without saying no matter what some of the anon's say. As I mentioned in another post, my skepticism of prothink goes back from probably before anyone reading here ever heard of him. He is someone I choose to ignore.

      anon @ 10:06 AM, No matter the how's of 9/11, Rabbi Zakheim can never be absolved. He is a main perp and we all know it.

    27. Not to speak for other anon but its possible he is talking about NTS pushing "no planes" and not totally failing the litmus test.

      As far as absolving Zakheim, it may not totally do that considering WHERE the Pentagon got hit(accounting section,newly renovated) and his PNAC ties but taking the SPC remote flight aspect out is taking out a fairly big piece of evidence. It just makes more sense that if there was any tv fakery(and not just after the fact to fool activists into a wild goose chase and into looking like fools) it was to hide plane swaps and/or modifications, not the fact that there is "NO PLANES!!!!!!" as certain people like to loudly proclaim. It also makes sense that if Zakheim is involved(obviously) he and his would have disinfo meant to cover their asses. Enter "No planes!!!". The Pentagon is a whole other thing though. A drone jet would have been shot down. It was either a missile or bomb.

    28. Sure, the pentagon is clearly Zakheim's baby. What was the official story? The plane made an incoming 320 degree turn and hit the rabbi's own accountants who just the day before had been tasked with finding the missing trillions? What a crazy story.

      Dov's ties to System Planning Corporation and their remote-controlled aircraft systems adds fuel to the fire of him being one of the very top perps. And yes, I think there were faked videos that have led a lot of people to chasing phantoms.

    29. Better watch it Kenny, the hasbaRATs will jump all over you if you dont buy into "no planes" in NYC and let Dov and SPC walk.

  2. even curiouser, when Eulogizing Washington, TJ sez....

    "On the whole, his character was, in its mass, perfect, in nothing bad, in few points indifferent; and it may truly be said, that never did nature and fortune combine more perfectly to make a man great, and to place him in the same constellation with whatever worthies have merited from man an everlasting remembrance. For his was the singular destiny and merit, of leading the armies of his country successfully through an arduous war, for the establishment of its independence; of conducting its councils through the birth of a government, new in its forms and principles, until it had settled down into a quiet and orderly train; and of scrupulously obeying the laws through the whole of his career, civil and military, of which the history of the world furnishes no other example...

    These are my opinions of General Washington, which I would vouch at the judgment seat of God, having been formed on an acquaintance of thirty years...

    I felt on his death, with my countrymen, that "verily a great man hath fallen this day in Israel."

    -Thomas Jefferson, January 2, 1814

    maturaity and wisdom emanate from the voice of experience...

    ...go have some fun children...
    go to the library and demand fiction books be put in the fiction section...
    {keep an eye out for 5 star gorillas}

    laugh it up.

    August moments, Kenny

    1. Tupper's reminders are always relevant. I'm glad I got to meet him.

  3. Allow me now to present the testimony of Eustace Mullins, if only for the vivid pictures he presents to the mind of the terrors endured by millions of Russian Christians in Bolshevik Russia when it was under Jewish hegemony. Could this be the fate of American Christians in the not too distant future?

    There are too many well documented massacres in history in which the Jews tortured and murdered their victims with the greatest glee, gloating in such barbaric practices as tearing out the hearts of women and children and smearing the blood on their faces.

    The orgy of murder, torture and pillage which followed the Jewish triumph in Russia [after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917] has never been equaled in the history of the world. The Jews were free to indulge their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims.

    Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain.

    Others were placed in boxes…then hungry rats placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion.

    Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while the mob attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death.

    Mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms….the baby [was] tossed into the air while another member of the mob rushed to catch it on the tip of his bayonet.

    Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies.
    (See here)

    1. "Could this be the fate of American Christians in the not too distant future?"

      Alexander Solzhenitsyn would probably say yes.

    2. Wow Greg Bacon, long time no hear.

      Do you have a blog at this time?

    3. Yes he does and its literally like 1,000,000 times better than your blog "American Goy", you useful(to Israeli warmongers)idiot jackass.

  4. Romney and Ryan. We could call the White House the 'Double R Ranch,' just another farm team for Israel and Wall Street.

    1. Heres a comment I posted on Yahoo:

      Romney and Ryan. So similar. They're like 2 identical corporate owned empty suits with Ken doll hair. Right out of central casting for "typical politicians". Mind you I'm not voting for Obama either but Romney and Ryan(he voted for all of these things) are for endless war,the Patriot Act,NDAA,warrentless domestic spying,bank bailouts,a blank check for Israel(who we already give 3 billion a year to),corporate welfare,tax breaks and loopholes for the very rich and corporations,SOPA and many more damaging things. "Small government" my foot.

    2. Heres another:

      some of Paul Ryans record:

      Ryan voted for the illegal Iraq War.

      Ryan voted with George W. Bush 94% of the time.

      Ryan voted for an emergency $78 billion for war in Iraq & Afghanistan.

      Ryan voted "yea" on most of Obama's stimulus bills.

      Ryan voted "yea" on making the Patriot Act permanent.

      Ryan voted "yea" on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant.

      Ryan voted for No Child Left Behind.

      Ryan voted for TARP(the bank bailouts).

      Ryan voted for the auto industry bailout.

      Ryan voted for NDAA(including indefenite detention of US citizens).

      Ryan was for SOPA, the internet bill that would hand more control of it over to the government.

      Ryan voted for the unconstitutional and illegal United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012.

      "The bill provides Israel with a blank check drawn on the US taxpayer to maintain its 'qualitative military superiority' over all of its neighbors combined."(we already give them over 3 billion a year but thats not enough US tax payer dollars according to Ryan).

      WOW! This Paul Ryan guy is a real "small government" type huh? I guess its all how you look at it. He wants to attack social security and medicaid so he MUST be a "small government" guy right? Yeah right.....

      I actually got 14 thumbs up and 2 thumbs down on that one,surprisingly enough.

    3. I must admit I stole most of that list from a Daily Paul blog. Ryan is a true blue Israel firster though. Check his record. And Mr. Budget Hawk of course wants to INCREASE defense spending.

    4. That summed him up very well.

      Probably most reading here will not vote for either of the candidates in this puppet show. Is Obama the 'lesser of evils' here? What a choice, if there even is one in this world of swing state electronic voting machines.

    5. I told you Paulsterity comes, no matter if its Paul Ryan or Ron Paul (or the brown dude, for that matter, who will not get re-elected).

    6. You are right about that B-man. Even if you're wrong about controlled op useful idiot Friend and his Hitler obsession. Hitler was not the monster we make him to be(at least not any more than our own leaders) but hes also not the hero Friend makes him out to be. Andnyes, he did help the zionist cause by sending jews to Palestine. Of all the fucking palces huh?

    7. Don't worry about B-man. He's from Alabama, where Joann Fabrics & Michaels arts & craft always have white cloths on sale for .66 ¢ a yard.

    8. Team R & R; Less taxes on the rich and the Fortune 500 and gutting Social Securiy; MediCare and MedicAid to pay for the tax loss and to pay for never ending wars for Wall Street and Israel.

      I weep for this nation.

  5. some related entertainment

  6. Jews instigate us into squabbling over the question of whether “more lives were saved than lost?” by dropping the bombs on Japan. That’s how jewry distracts us from discussing the truth. Jewry gives an either-or scenario in which both sides are false and then pits us into arguing for one of the falsities as true. It’s an absurdity, and yet it’s a constant. Democrats and Republicans are another such false pair. Both are jew parties. Their decoy act in regard to the Second Amendment is another one, as if it were a choice between hunters’ rights and gun-less peace. Our right to bear arms is to Defend Ourselves against a corrupted government, as Thomas Jefferson predicted would be necessary. It is necessary now.

    No Ron Paul on ballot = no vote.

  7. With a fascist son like Rand Paul, F^ck No.

    1. Er anon@11:15, who do you want as president?

  8. “Between ten and ten-thirty, four white males who were dressed darkly, dressed in all black clothing, came in and opened fire on our congregation.”

    Although speculation has centered around alleged shooter Wade Michael Page’s ties to white supremacists, a definitive motive for the massacre has yet to be established. After initially claiming Page was killed by a police officer, authorities now assert that he shot himself in the head.


    3 Mossad/CIA gunman, plus a wannabe spook/fallguy/ex-psyop flunky, enter the temple and kill innocent worshippers. Then the Mossad/CIA kill the patsy according to plan and leave the temple.

    = false flag for grabbing guns AGAINST the second amendment.


  10. John, FYI-Im only one "troll" but had you not censored just about every comment Ive made at your site I likely would have never mentioned you and your tactics here or on other sites. You asked for this by suspiciously deleting all negative comments from your site and not allowing a deabte to take place. So it takes place elsewhere. Not just "attack" comments and ad homs get deleted but legitimate questions as well. You brought this on your self with your actions and your reactions to legit criticism.

  11. Email Kevin Ryan and ask him why he is yet again protecting Israel in his analysis of 9/11:

    Gee, what names are missing? Silverstein,Hauer and Zakheim for startes. His contact info is at the bottom of the page.

    1. It wouldn't do any good. He's a limited hangout. I saw his latest article at 911 Blogger. That's a good place for him.

    2. Boy is he ever. He actually tried to blame Saudia Arabia before so I guess I was just suggesting we make his job a little tougher more than expecting any real results. Heres part of the exchange I had with him after asking why Hauer and Zakheim were not on his list:

      Hello (unimportant name),

      I agree that there are reasons to suspect them but others made my first list due to reasons that can be seen or found in the links at the website. I'd be glad to see your write-up on Hauer and Zakheim.

      It's important that people have these discussions when evidence can be cited and compared, so thanks for the message.


      To which I reply:

      How did Larry Silverstein not make the cut? I certainly disagree with you on the power of the evidence linking Zakheim,Silverstein and Hauer to 9/11. Have you read Jerry Mazza's work on Dov Zakheim? Here are a couple of links that touch on both Zakheim and Hauer as I'm assuming you already know plenty about Larry Silverstein:

      And more broadly on Israels role: ­ck-therapy-and-the-birth-of-the-lie/?utm_source=feedburner&u ­tm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+EmpireStrikesBlack+%28Em ­pireStrikesBlack%29 ­-flag.html

      I still havent heard back from Kevin and dont anticipate it. The evidence is irrefutable and Kevin Ryan knows it. His task is not to fight the truth directly but to plant disinformation.

    3. Good for you and you did it straight up and without being hateful. That's what we need to do. Expose the more major players in the disinfo and let them know we're on to them.

      Somehow I had missed seeing your last link until now. Maybe I should repost it here just to have it in the archives. It's a good overview.

      A quote from it:

      "Lost in the endless debates of how (nano-thermite, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes, TV fakery) is the far more important, who and why."

  12. I've often written about the detailed and vivid account of A. Hitler's meeting with top German industrialists --Krupp, Thysen, I.G. Farben et al. It was in that meeting that German fascism was made real in terms of an agreement between the Reich and its 'fascist' sponsors, the huge corporations who would benefit from aggression, death and destruction.
    The meeting may not have defined the word 'fascism' but it most certainly birthed a Nazi regime in which corporations were given and promised not only privileges but, most importantly, big juicy contracts.;id=8;url=http%3A%2F%2Fexistentialistcowboy%2Eblogspot%2Ecom%2F2012%2F08%2Fhow%2Dcitizens%2Dunited%2Dsubverted%2Drights%2Dof%2Ehtml

    1. That's what I call a nice addition to the debate. And no name calling! yeah

  13. Replies
    1. So News Corp owns Thomas Nelson by way of HarperCollins. That explains a lot. A protocol attack on Christianity? I guess I should take back anything nice I said about Thomas Nelson.

      For the moment I'm still sticking with the idea that Jefferson was not a standard Christian according to the modern evangelical definition and that Barton was working from his own agenda. Any thoughts on that?

      I also still prefer the stripped down Jefferson Bible.

      One more thing from your link...

      "Messianic Rabbi Michael Wolf charges that Barton also minimizes Jefferson’s unorthodox views of Christ, his negative views of the Jewish people, and his contempt for the God of Abraham."

      Score one for Jefferson in my opinion.

    2. Fake debate. Fuck Fox, the Rabbi and the zealot with the Jefferson book.

    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    4. kenny, August 13, 2012 7:51 PM

      'For the moment I'm still sticking with the idea that Jefferson was not a standard Christian... '

      Hi Kenny,

      What if he was a Muslim?

      I believe Jefferson was a Muslim based on these 3 factors:

      - Carrying the Qur'an (Doesn't make him a Muslim of course but)
      - Taking his oath on the Quran (Does definitely make him a Muslim)
      -His DNA shows his ancestors were Muslim (No reason to doubt)

      Above can be searched online. But only God Knows


  15. another one bites the dust....August 14, 2012 at 8:23 AM

    Its working-

    Congratulations JohnFriend!

  16. Seriously, with "friends" like them around, yuck.

  17. Kenny:

    I don't know if you knew Piglipstick

    but there is a note on the last post comments section from his wife saying he passed away on August 4th. I, for one, will really miss this blogger who also went by the name nolocontendre.