Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Obligatory Pearl Harbor Posting


Sometimes you feel obligated to pass along, once again, a different side of a story that's not taught in our mainstream classrooms and media.

This is another one of those times.

Wars are always about deceptions and they just keep coming. Wars make the bankers and their various allies smile.



Here's one basic alternative view.
The Myth of Pearl Harbour 

Pearl Harbour posterOn Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, the Japanese launched a sneak attack at Pearl Harbor that decimated the US Pacific Fleet and forced the United States to enter WWII. That's what most of us were taught as school children... But, except for the date, everything you just read is a myth. In reality, there was no sneak attack. The Pacific Fleet was far from destroyed. And, furthermore, the United States took great pains to bring about the assault.

On January 27, 1941, Joseph C. Grew, the U.S. ambassador to Japan, wired Washington that he'd learned of the surprise attack Japan was preparing for Pearl Harbour. On September 24, a dispatch from Japanese naval intelligence to Japan's consul general in Honolulu was deciphered. The transmission was a request for a grid of exact locations of ships in Pearl Harbour. Surprisingly, Washington chose not to share this information with the officers at Pearl Harbour. Then, on November 26, the main body of the Japanese strike force (consisting of six aircraft carriers, two battleships, three cruisers, nine destroyers, eight tankers, 23 fleet submarines, and five midget submarines) departed Japan for Hawaii.
Despite the myth that the strike force maintained strict radio silence, US Naval intelligence intercepted and translated many dispatches. And, there was no shortage of dispatches: Tokyo sent over 1000 transmissions to the attack fleet before it reached Hawaii. Some of these dispatches, in particular this message from Admiral Yamamoto, left no doubt that Pearl Harbour was the target of a Japanese attack: "The task force, keeping its movement strictly secret and maintaining close guard against submarines and aircraft, shall advance into Hawaiian waters, and upon the very opening of hostilities shall attack the main force of the United States fleet and deal it a mortal blow. The first air raid is planned for the dawn of x-day. Exact date to be given by later order."

Even on the night before the attack, US intelligence decoded a message pointing to Sunday morning as a deadline for some kind of Japanese action. The message was delivered to the Washington high command more than four hours before the attack on Pearl Harbour. But, as many messages before, it was withheld from the Pearl Harbour commanders.Although many ships were damaged at Pearl Harbour, they were all old and slow. The main targets of the Japanese attack fleet were the Pacific Fleet's aircraft carriers, but Roosevelt made sure these were safe from the attack: in November, at about the same time as the Japanese attack fleet left Japan, Roosevelt sent the Lexington and Enterprise out to sea. Meanwhile, the Saratoga was in San Diego.

Why did Pearl Harbour happen? Roosevelt wanted a piece of the war pie. Having failed to bait Hitler by giving $50.1 billion in war supplies to Britain, the Soviet Union, France and China as part of the Lend Lease program, Roosevelt switched focus to Japan. Because Japan had signed a mutual defence pact with Germany and Italy, Roosevelt knew war with Japan was a legitimate back door to joining the war in Europe. On October 7, 1940, one of Roosevelt's military advisors, Lieutenant Commander Arthur McCollum, wrote a memo detailing an 8-step plan that would provoke Japan into attacking the United States. Over the next year, Roosevelt implemented all eight of the recommended actions. In the summer of 1941, the US joined England in an oil embargo against Japan. Japan needed oil for its war with China, and had no remaining option but to invade the East Indies and Southeast Asia to get new resources. And that required getting rid of the US Pacific Fleet first.

Although Roosevelt may have got more than he bargained for, he clearly let the attack on Pearl Harbour happen, and even helped Japan by making sure their attack was a surprise. He did this by withholding information from Pearl Harbour's commanders and even by ensuring the attack force wasn't accidentally discovered by commercial shipping traffic. As Rear Admiral Richmond K. Turner stated in 1941: "We were prepared to divert traffic when we believed war was imminent. We sent the traffic down via the Torres Strait, so that the track of the Japanese task force would be clear of any traffic."

 Going a little deeper down the fox hole. The terriers are in pursuit. 
The Pearl Harbor Deception 
Pearl Harbor - Conspiracy!

Old Pearl Harbor, New Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor's to Come 

Pearl Harbor - Mother of All Conspiracies  

Pearl Harbor. FDR KNEW

Pearl Harbor and World War II

Pearl Harbor Conspiracy: FDR & Churchill Betrayal 


None Dare Call It Conspiracy
The ultimate advantage that the creditor has over the government or ruler is the threat that if the borrower steps out of line the banker can finance an enemy or rival and can even create an enemy by such means. 
Therefore, if you want to stay in the king-financing business, it is wise to have an enemy or a rival waiting in the wings to unseat every ruler to whom you lend. If the king does'nt have an enemy, you must create one.

IT HAS BEEN IN THE INTEREST OF THESE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIERS TO ENCOURAGE GOVERNMENT DEBT. The higher the debt, the more the interest on the debt. Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war (in 1935, before the out- break of World War Two, total U.S. public debt was $28 billion 708 million, or $225.55 per capita. In 1940, before the attack on Pearl Harbour, the public debt was $42 billion 968 million, or $325.23 per capita. But, by 1945, with the cessation of hostilities, it was $258 billion 682 million, or $1,848.60 per capita! -ed.); and it has not been an uncommon practice among the international bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts!

But while wars and revolutions have been useful to the international financiers in gaining or increasing control over governments, the key to such control has always been control of money. You can control a government if you have it in your debt; a creditor is in a position to demand the privileges of monopoly from the  overeign. Money-seeking governments have granted monopolies in state banking, natural resources, oil concessions, transportation, medicine, and others. However, the monopoly the international financiers have most coveted is control over a nation's money.   pdf

19 comments:

  1. Tomorrow (Thursday) at 00:04 the Eisenhower will be reported off the coast of Syria by Reuters.

    http://rt.com/usa/news/us-eisenhower-syria-military-369/

    Fuck the NWO
    December 5, 2012 5:03 PM

    "The US government is contemplating significant intervention in the Syria conflict and has discussed employing Patriot Air and Missile Defense Systems in Turkey and directly providing arms to opposition fighters."

    There is no Syria conflict. What there is is USrael/NATO taking over another country for Rothschild where hundreds and thousands of men, women and children will be bombed to death - just like in Libya.

    I hope Rothschild and all the soldiers who participate in this war of aggression are destroyed.


    Welcome to IsraHell on earth
    December 5, 2012 5:19 PM

    Assad killing his own people - BULLSHIT.
    Assad going to use poison gas on his own people - BULLSHIT!
    The only thing Bashar Assad has been doing for 18 months is trying to prevent Syria from being taken over and destroyed by zionism.

    Western and corporate media make me puke.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's the perfect false flag:

      Reuters: Eisenhower bombed and sunk by Irainian launched Russian missile - over 6,000 Americans dead.

      WW3

      Delete
    2. False flag because neither Iran nor Russia was involved - hint: USS Liberty.

      Delete
    3. http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2012/12/its-going-to-take-a-really-big-war-to-create-the-zionist-dream-of-a-greater-israel-2448700.html

      Delete
    4. I couldn't even turn on local news this morning to catch the weather without hearing Sarin Gas over and over. This is really being pushed.

      Dec. 7 might be an apt day for a false flag.

      Delete
    5. I heard the same thing about sarin gas on the NBC network news last night . It was somewhat "shades of Saddam".

      Delete
    6. You would think most everyone would catch on by now. Maybe not.

      Delete
  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6ZsXrzF8Cc

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kenny,
    Excellent post!

    I too can sniff a false-flag attack in the air. All one has to do is listen to NPR - they have a special tone in their voice when they are trying to scare listeners or evoke sympathy for people we are supposed to be mad at. You can also hear it in Obama's voice; he appears to have issued an ultimatum against Syria.

    I wish someone would invoke the Patriot Act to arrest the real terrorists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also have seen what appeared to be NPR tipping their hand. They seen to do it quite often. Public radio my ***.

      Delete
  4. cspan washington journal showed a video of hillary in front of a zionist terrorist flag,
    several times...while callers lambasted her deceitful conniving covinous collusion with the zionist terrorists....there were some koolaid drinking gender nonspecific persons who allegedly "thought" hillary would be a great....you know ass kisser of the jewish terrorists

    http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_waco.htm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVEkQ9mmzLU

    neo-cons...pearl harbors'...mass murder...."Jewish" narrative...

    "Jewish" so-called State...TERRORISTS for profit

    http://www.slideshare.net/AutoSurfRestarter/the-levanter-by-eric-ambler

    hugh sprunt

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was a good video. Bill and Hillary/are a tag team.

      The old blackmailed subservient bitch witch must never be promoted as a potential president in 2016. That's an insult to what little sensibilities we have left. Jeb Bush too. We're going to scream too loud for that to happen.

      Delete
  5. Kenny,
    I really like the way you lay it out...while still being conscientious of other peoples feelings. Makes this post very shareable.
    -switters

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't find the article anymore, but I read years ago that the War Department and the Navy conducted exercises around Pearl Harbor -- well before the attack -- in order to ascertain how Japan could most easily attack Pearl Harbor, and guess what? The scenario they came up with was exactly how Japan attacked, right down to the weather, time of day, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  7. After 21 months of international conspiracy, the American-led propaganda war on Syria seems to be moving towards the endgame of providing the political cover for direct Western military attack on that unfortunate country. This is, of course, outrageously criminal. But it is entirely predictable from the bigger picture strategic agenda of Washington and its allies: to roll over the anti-imperialist Syrian enemy, install a pliable pro-Western regime, and then pave the way for the next round of war in the region - against Iran.

    http://leftwing-christian.net/2012/12/06/west-moves-in-for-syrian-end-game-and-war-on-iran.aspx?ref=rss

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kenny,

    This is kinda interesting....how much does it really cost to buy out someone these days? As you can see, he was totally honest 10 years ago. There was No Justice for Rachel Corrie and same for the 2 dead girls in Korea as well.

    Nationalism is a complicated force, and it might not always mean the same thing within one culture as it does in another. Keep that in mind as you read about how Psy, the South Korean rapper beloved in the United States for his mega-hit Gangnam Style, participated in two anti-American performances a few years before he became a big star here. And keep in mind that this is bigger than just Psy and his performances, particularly as controversy is likely to build over President Obama and his family’s plans to attend a charity concert featuring the Korean pop star.
    In 2002, Psy walked onto the stage at a massive performance meant to protest the large U.S. military presence in South Korea. He wore an outlandish, glittered red costume and gold face paint. As the crowd cheered him on, Psy lifted a large model of a U.S. tank and, to cheers and applause, smashed it against the stage.
    ....
    On June 13, 2002, one of the many U.S. military vehicles in South Korea struck and killed two 14-year-old girls walking along the side of a road outside Seoul. Because of the terms of the U.S.-South Korean treaty that allows for America’s military presence there, the incident was considered a “military operation” and thus outside of Korea’s jurisdiction. A U.S. court martial acquitted the driver and his commander.


    Two years later, Psy joined several other performers in a concert, this one also protesting the United States and its military. He rapped a song titled “Dear American.” The song is not his – the original is by South Korean metal band N.EX.T – but here are the lyrics, in English and in Korean, in case any readers would like to suggest a better translation:

    싸이 rap : 이라크 포로를 고문해 댄 씨발양년놈들과
    고문 하라고 시킨 개 씨발 양년놈들에
    딸래미 애미 며느리 애비 코쟁이 모두 죽여
    아주 천천히 죽여 고통스럽게 죽여
    Kill those —— Yankees who have been torturing Iraqi captives
    Kill those —— Yankees who ordered them to torture
    Kill their daughters, mothers, daughters-in-law, and fathers
    Kill them all slowly and painfully




    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/07/gangnam-nationalism-why-psys-anti-american-rap-shouldnt-surprise-you/




    ReplyDelete
  9. Kenny, Rep. Hamilton Fish III's book, FDR: the other side of the coin, is excellent and exposes FDR for the lying piece of traitorous shit that he was.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Looks llike the hasbara dropped by your siite yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was it the "no one to vote for" creep? Or one of John Friends lackeys? They infest this site like a bad hasbaRASH.

      Delete