Friday, October 25, 2013

Reinforcing Myths at the World Series

James Taylor sings "God Bless America" alongside Carlos Arredondo, center, and Boston Marathon bombing survivor Jeff Bauman, second from right, during the seventh inning stretch of Game 2 of baseball's World Series between the Boston Red Sox and the St. Louis Cardinals Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013, in Boston. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Well, we all know the various stories of Jeff and Carlos. Just how great is it to have the coincidence of the Red Sox in the World Series and the opportunity to share these heroes with the world? I'll leave it to others to analyze this reinforcement to a myth.

h/t summonthemagic


  1. Hello Kenny....are you kidding me and people fall for this false theater!.......aaaaagggh!


  2. Well, since I got a tip of the cap, I guess it's almost imperative that I chip in here to point out the following:

    1) MLB is deeply connected to the center of power in the USofA in a myriad of ways, starting at least but not alone with the fact that Fay Vincent owns a private home on the privatized estate of John Rockefeller's grand-daughter (the former Mount Hope Farm) whose interim owner was Williams College whose leadership and professorship was deeply connected to the CIA et alia. Go ahead and do the research; I have. I grew up in that town, across from the estate. This club, among many, has been prominent in its promotion of the military with fly-bys and other events (color guards).
    2) The RedSox ownership made much of its cash through TV production and one of its owners just bought the Boston Globe. (He paid more for his second baseman, shades of Babe Ruth and Calvin Coolidge.)
    3) There are interesting coincidences between certain elements of the Greater Boston community and the events of the bombing, aside from the obvious element of the remaining patsy being held in a Federal psychiatric prison hospital on the grounds of the former Army base in Devens, MA. Living in Greater Boston, and having stayed up all night to watch TV the night of the great chase/lockdown, I took immediate notice -- having spent some of my professional time in the EMS/mass casualty incident world in this locale -- of the hospital administrator who stepped forward blatantly, discordantly, obviously, to "horn in" on the press conference for the trauma surgeon who "received" the fellow surreptitiously slipped away from the stated intake point of Mount Auburn Hospital and spirited to "the official hospital of the Boston Red Sox" across the street from the old ball yard, to inform authorities that his institution was quite prepared to handle other casualties should that be necessary. I took notice that one of the ballclub's more notable and frequent advertisers -- the major domo of a chain of furniture stores -- was highlighted -- on the media and alone on the street -- for his role in placing flowers at the scene.
    4) The club was center and central -- along with the Boston Bruins -- as a post team in jumping on the media bandwagon used to keep the focus on the horror and the victims and away from the problems with the facts, evidence, etc.

    Yes, media and sports teams are a major part of social engineering. And part of that process involves "blending" of meaning and focus and the inherent suggestion that to question anything is to be set up for social ostracization. To know that there are serious questions about the veracity of the law enforcement perspective and action is to not be a member of the cheering Red Sox Nation.

    BTW, Kenny, my blog continues not to be updated anywhere despite the fact that I have created new entries almost every 30-36 hours. I am now investigating alternative methods of hosting.

  3. Boston will win the WS, to re-enforce the propaganda that you can't keep America down. Just like the NE 'Patriots' won the Stupid Bowl after 9/11.

    "Go team, go!"

  4. Well Kenny Detroit tried but came up a little bit short. Anyone want to venture a guess as to how many people in the stands had their hands over their hearts for the singing of God bless America?

  5. From the AP article you linked there are only three comments. The one comment that is "with" the story is by boston Stronger. I really have noticed the trolls and govt agents are having trouble keeping up with so many "awakened' comments on stories. Eventually comments being disabled will be the norm, and then fewer page views, then fewer ad dollars. Suppressing blog stats are a tool but that won't stop the truth from getting out.

    Thank you for being a truth teller and not having ads or sponsors BTW.


  6. Thanks to everyone for dropping by and adding their input. I was watching the 7th inning stretch scene and I'm always amazed at the never ending stage shows to prop up the official stories.

    1. Shameless how they fix these games to promote their PsyOps and keep their fear-based conditioning alive in people's psyches and make tons of gambling money from rigged games at the same time.

      Abirato did an interesting broadcast last week on sports fixing

      Brian Tuohy of will talk about his latest book, Larceny Games.

      Good write-up on his site:

      "How much of your life have you spent watching televised sports, attending games, talking about sports, listening to sports radio, checking websites for updated scores, and then taking in SportsCenter or another highlight show at the end of the day? How much of your thoughts have been consumed with the upcoming game? How many nights have you stayed awake wondering how your team blew that huge lead? How often have you reminisced about that impossible comeback win as if you played in the game? How much money have you emptied out of your pocket on tickets, DirectTV packages, bets, jerseys, hats, trading cards, autographs and overpriced beers over the course of your lifetime?

      What if all of that time, emotion, and money has been wasted on a lie? What if the action on the field isn’t what it appears to be? What if you, and millions others like you, have been duped – outright lied to – by those franchises you hold so dear to your heart, all in the name of making an easy buck?

      Well, my friend, it has happened. And although your name might not be “Mark”, you have certainly become one to those running the carnival known as professional sports.

      When a win seems too good to be true - it is. When an impossible turn of events changes the course of a game - it is. When the story of an improbable underdog rises to the top like some sort of Hollywood screenplay - it is.

      The leagues, hand-in-hand with the TV networks which pour billions of dollars into professional sports, have fixed their own games to squeeze every ounce of drama they can out of each season and to ensure you remain committed to their sport and glued to your TV.

      This website is dedicated to shining the light into those dark corners and exposing professional sports leagues and their athletes for the money grubbing hypocrites they are. Some may call these sports conspiracy theories. I call them the truth."

      "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." ~ Mark Twain

      "The trouble with the world is not that people know too little but that they know so many things that just ain't so." -- Mark Twain
      Mark Twain in Nikola Tesla's lab

      ~Negentropic MK I

    2. Interesting commentary at The Fix Is In and I'll check out more there as time permits. He seems to admit he speculates a lot but that's not to dismiss that he may be on to some things. My own personal opinion has been that MLB would be the hardest of the sports he mentions to fix outcomes but I don't really know. Steroid use has certainly tainted the game but drugs have been part of the game for over 40 years. One of my favorite stories is Dock Ellis allegedly pitching a no hitter on LSD.

      Another version here..

  7. Is this phenomenon limited to baseball, or to Boston? I think not. It's just that the event in Boston gave license to jump on the bandwagon and steer it. Lot of MLB teams played "Sweet Caroline" (someone should do a riff on the meaning and genesis of that tune) as a tip of the cap to Boston, and the celebration of American military power and exceptionalism is certainly present in pro football. By the way, before the first pitch of the Series, I went on record as predicting the Cards in six. The Cards have three home games starting in a few hours. It'll be interesting to see how they deal with the anthem, the seventh-inning stretch, etc. Few baseball announcers have dared to note the radical decline in paid attendance throughout the year. If they can't acknowledge the obvious in their own house, how does anyone believe they'll broach the serious political issues? And, Kenny, this is right up your alley, no one here in the sports scene in Boston wants to delve into the act of murderous rage by the estranged son of the former Red Sox player/TV announcer who was once employed by the Red Sox as a security officer dealing with PED issues. But even on the street -- I'd guess it's the same in many locations -- you can't touch the topic of hoaxes, false flags, etc. or you will get ostracized quickly, alone again naturally.

    1. I've wondered if there's an esoteric meaning to "Sweet Caroline" and I never cared for the song from when it was new. It's annoying to hear it.

      I like baseball. Played it competitively for 11 years and softball for 18. Fond memories of early days when family and friends gathered together for a big meal and the Series game in the daytime. Usually the hated Yankees were in it. My dad took us to Atlanta several times, saw a lot of big names play but Roberto Clemente one game put on the greatest show I have ever seen live..

      I've always been an NL guy so I'll go with the Cards.

      It's a shame that the great kids game has been co-opted.

      I think the job market is so tight that folks are afraid of getting ostracized so they don't want to talk about all the questions. Because of my job I talked to a lot of materials and metals engineers right after 9/11 and many of them were very curious about the mechanisms of the collapses. They knew it didn't add up but over time the subject was dropped and they didn't want to discuss it. The same kind of thing goes on today.

    2. Forget about the mechanism of the collapses you saw on enemy-propaganda video, concentrate on the faked imagery. It's very easy to prove.

      Try the 3 image test to wake up your friends:

      The easiest thing to prove a complete lie is 'the planes:'

      Three separate images from three separate supposed 'amateur' photographers:

      Below is a screengrab of an "amateur" video credited To Luc Courchesne

      Below is a screengrab of the "amateur" Michael Herzarkhani video given to CNN:

      Below is a screengrab of an "amateur" video credited to Jennifer Spell:

      These images are obvious and very crudely done fakes. Three different fakers of the same supposed "real" event (all the videos are fake but these 3 suffice for all the proof needed) ? Both the buildings and the planes that are half-immersed in them with no holes or bend wings or parts falling off are fakes. Therefore, the videos they are in are pre-manufactured fakes and the video-makers are liars. The TV networks that aired these crude fakes as real can then be only one of two things:

      1) Dupes of the military and intelligence agencies who ran these videos and many more without checking for authenticity or establishing chain-of-custody.

      2) Not only actively engaged with military PsyOps in running faked pre-manufactured films as real in order to condition the public through trauma and fear but THE MAIN MEDIUM and ORGAN of this engagement.

      The evidence beyond just these 3 faked videos points overwhelmingly to conclusion number 2 but, either way, the 9-11 story, the official fabled peddled by the media is a lie even BEFORE examining the absurdity of the fable of "the man-in-the-cave & the 19 hijackers itself," and is finished.

      If you went to a any proper court of law and said 'a plane hit my building' and offered these 3 images as 'evidence,' you would be laughed at ! Not only that but, once established as 3 time liars, your entire case and testimony would be thrown out and the opposing side prosecuting you would win.

      falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

      False in one particular, false in everything.

      This principle of Roman law is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. The concept is that if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says. This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: it discredits the rest of their testimony. The object behind the principle is to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.

      The legal principles of interrogating witnesses have been drawn into the task of evaluating historical sources. Just as a witness in court can be impeached by being shown to have lied, an historical source likewise loses much of its authority if its author can be shown to have deliberately falsified something--how can we trust an author concerning fact X when we know him to have lied about fact Y? Such an author may corroborate something a better witness says, but has forfeited our trust where he speaks without corroboration.

      Print out color versions of those images as hi-res as you can and put it up in your living room and in your office and each person that asks you about them, give them the same rundown ending with "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" until they can't help but repeat the mantra themselves like a song stuck in their heads. Some may bring down "the wrath of ostracism" upon you as programmed but will feel bad doing it over such obvious tripe.

      ~ Negentropic MK II

    3. And yet it is exactly videos containing cartoon images like the above that are supposed to serve as 'proof' of both the official story of 9-11 and the official 'alternative' Loose Change version that the entire plane-hugging faction of the 'truth movement' (more like a bowel movement) subscribes to. The anti-zio movement just takes the deliberately retarded Alex-Jones / Loose Change peddled memes of 'remote controlled planes' and points to a different interpretation of the pre-manufactured "whodunnit" movie. The "smoking gun" is not inside the movie, the "smoking gun" is the movie itself and the ones inside the movie are there to keep you from finding this out.

      The problem is and has always been that there are no proper courts of law left to prosecute the perpetrators of 9-11 based on this very simple principle of law because they were all bought and paid for by the perps themselves ahead of time. Knowing that the courts and judges are bought and paid for, then they were free to let their imaginations run wild with many absurdities without fear of being prosecuted even if they were exposed, in fact, anticipating, laughing at and laying false-trails for the "exposers" to chase, and that is exactly what has happened. They have repeated this many times since 9-11 with other PsyOps to run in the serfs' faces, their total domination of almost every aspect of their lives.

      All sides of the plane-hugging / No-video-fakery debate are engaged in interpretations of a movie made for them by the powers-that-be, pointing to this or that "smoking gun" put in for them in advance such as the supposed "mistake" of building seven being brought down and Silverstein making his "pulled" mistake on PBS and yet another reporter on BBC magically announcing it ahead of time ? 9 buildings were brought down overall but only 3 shown on video; where are all the people complaining about the other 6 buildings that magically disappeared ? There are very few that even realize all 9 buildings of the entire complex were brought down, because enemy-propaganda video from a Zionist-Occupied-Government did not tell them to start yapping away about 9 buildings as part of the PsyOp in a controlled opposition direction, like they did with buildings 1, 2 & 7.

      9-11 was done through the media and with 100% complicity of the media. What most people refer to as 9-11 is nothing but a shock-&-awe pre-manufactured movie of 'an event,' not the event itself. The event itself was nothing but the demolition of 9 empty buildings that were wired for demolition many months, probably many years ahead and definitely planned at least 3 decades ahead. The buildings themselves may have been erected as symbols to be brought down decades later with predictive programming codes put in all over the place, as, for example on Supertramp's 20 million selling "Breakfast in America" album cover, released in 1979:

      ~ Negentropic MK III


    4. Of course, once one of your candidates has enough sense to agree with you that those three images are fake and yes, they would be thrown out of any proper court of law, you can show them this for the checkmate:

      Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career. Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic:

      "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

      The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the (supposed) deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet NOT ONE PIECE of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …"

      "Between the four airplanes which allegedly crashed on 911 there should be
      approximately 9 million parts. 3 million parts each for the 767 and 1.5
      million parts for the 757. In addition to the parts there should be 60 miles
      of wiring for each 757 or 120 miles for both. There is 90 miles of wiring
      on each 767 which makes 180 miles for both 767's. Wiring is stamped every 12
      inches or so with data which includes where it is going, where it is coming
      from and its maximum load capacity. The reason for this is that wiring is
      braided into bundles of up to one hundred wires and when you are tracing
      down a problem you have to know quickly which wire you are looking for and
      identify it."

      and once they have had some time to digest that, the final nails in the coffin (in the coffin of our own civilization and all notions of honorable conduct when you think about it, unless we change it), the actors used in the 9-11 related films :

      9-11 PROPAGANDA - Simon Shack

      After which, the next logical step and the final layer of the onion follows naturally as the most obvious thing in the world:

      "I did an exhaustive check of the list of victims provided on the CNN website. What I found is that out of 2,970 people listed, only 446 appear in the Social Security death index. Of those only 249 have a confirmed death certificate on file. Of those, not a single one has a valid “last address of record” on file."~ Ersun Warncke, Salem News - Independent confirmation of the 'Vicsims Report' - 9/11 Reflections Part 2: Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues

      "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." ~ Arthur Schopenhauer

      ~Negentropic MK IV

    5. Part I, above.....
      So, the multitudes of ppl on the streets (or in their apts) that day.....when they said they saw a plane, they were just watching a film instead? A film projected on the tower?
      Military plane seems logical, as was described by many who were there.

    6. Negen, you make a lot of good points and I appreciate the effort but many of the things you talk about are not for novices with short attention spans and deeply embedded preconceived notions. For what it's worth my standard technique when you only have seconds is to point to videos or photos of the towers exploding and ask if this is a pancake collapse and to 7 and ask if this is anything you have seen before where buildings are controlled demolished. If they show interest one can go from there.

      The aspect of the entire Silverstein complex being destroyed is certainly not as well known as others. The hole in Building 6 is a good example to question.

      You are spot on that without control/complicity of the investigative agencies, judicial systems and media the whole psyops could never have held up Yes, they are laughing in our faces and thinking that after 12 years they will continue this forever or unless they decide that another narrative would be beneficial.

      My skeptical self also has to question whether Shack is playing the same game he exposes. Much truth with a mix of diversion to try and discredit those who have many serious questions? Media fakery is a given but as far as everything he speculates, I'm not that sure about. That's me. Thanks for the contribution.

      Lou Reed died today . It's the top story at this moment at google news. Never a fan but his minimalistic approach was definitely an influence to the punk side of us, but aspects of some of the jewish agenda are apparent in his career.

      I like the lead guitarist in this one.

    7. @Martha said "Part I, above.....
      So, the multitudes of ppl on the streets (or in their apts) that day.....when they said they saw a plane, they were just watching a film instead? A film projected on the tower?
      Military plane seems logical, as was described by many who were there"

      It makes no difference what "multitudes of people" say they saw on a pre-manufactured film you saw on controlled TV and what, undoubtedly, thousands of others, convinced themselves they "saw" to make their reality fall in line with what they were shown by enemy propaganda or your TV. Witness testimony is notoriously unreliable and is NEVER enough to convict a single person of any crime absent hard evidence, never mind entire nations in attacks that were supposed to have killed 2970 people.

      Let me ask you this. If me and 20 of my friends and a hundred of their friends get together and swear we saw you kill someone, would that be enough to convict you minus a murder weapon and being able to connect you to the murder with hard evidence ? Of course not. But somehow you ignored the 100% conclusive 3 different fake images from 3 different fake videos from 3 different "amateur" photographers, the evidence of your own eyes in front of you, as if they didn't matter ? How so ? Instead of saying, well, these 3 images are obviously cartoons and there would be no reason whatsoever that they would fake 3 different films if the planes were real, you somehow jump to the non-sequitur conclusion that no, the videos are real images of "holograms" or projected images because "thousands" say they saw planes.

      Nonsense. None of those videos would be accepted in any proper court of law as "real shots" of holograms or "projections," period. They would be thrown out and the entire testimony behind it, not just the so-called official fable of the 19 hijackers but the fable of the "planes" themselves. End of story. Our problem is not the fake 9-11 story, one of the most easily proven piles of bullcrap in history, but the lack of any honest courts willing to prosecute the case.

      ~Negentropic MK VI

    8. The problem with building seven or for that matter the demolition of 9 buildings altogether using only 2 jet-fuel fires is that you cannot present those as "facts" without pre-supposing the plane-crashes which are false. Just by jumping the gun to the building collapses and ignoring the planes, you have already confirmed the official story of the planes which is the reason given for the fires in the buildings. What you need to do is say is present the impossibility of building demolitions of any kind from fires but then make sure there is no confusion that this then implies that yes, planes were used but they set-up the demo themselves. What you need to do is 1) Proving a single aspect of the fraud 100% false and getting them to agree that BUT WITHOUT presupposing the planes and 2) Immediately after proving your case for the impossibility of the building demos with fire (not jet-fuel fire, any fire of any intensity) jump directly to

      falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

      False in one particular, false in everything.

      and throw the entire story out ON ITS ASS !! The "planes," the "hijackers," the remote-control nonsense, the whole friggin' shebang. Gone. Outta here. No obligation to believe ANY of it at all.

      ~Negentropic MK VII

  8. I also saw the 7th inning stretch, and couldn't believe it when they announced the 'heroes' from the bombing on the field. Lots of military in attendance, very noticeably....seems like every branch represented. Not understanding the connection of the military & playing baseball. Are they keeping us free to play??
    Grew up watching the RSox, and moved away from my home state just last year. You are right about the resistance there. When I tried to mention questions about the bombing, I was very shocked at the hostile response I received.
    And I had thought this was one of the most progressive states. They put the blinders on...most people there are towing the line. The RSox don't need to win....& might not.....the myth is already solidified.

    1. Most people have the blinders on and I don't think it matters what part of the country it is. Not everyone though and that's what keeps us going. Thanks.

    2. MA is different, or was different I should say...growing up there, I would never have expected people to respond as they did....seeing as it is the home of the Revolution. The home of Sam Adams, Revere, etc...

  9. Google combo....

    vogt + dunning + crisis actors + hseep+dunning

  10. Tonight's Series psyops was brought to you by "Stand Up to Cancer." $4 million down, $4 million to go. Break out that Mastercard kids and help keep the lies alive.

    "This is where the end to cancer begins" Who do you stand up for?

    Get the app, fun for all.

    1. The 7th inning stretch "God Bless American" sponsored by.....the military. Bank of America says "Thanks troops."

    2. The shortage of civilian anthem singers continues....
      Did everyone say Thanks to BOA tonight...don't forget before bed.

      There's another $4 mill. down the drain. But they are oh-so-close to a cure! Keep the $ flowin' in.
      Yet, those offering therapies & treatments which worked decades ago were completely squelched & pushed out of biz!

    3. I'm watching it Martha and yes, the same as last night. The merging of sports, the military and big banks is what the empire deems necessary.

    4. It's creeping me out!
      Wonder if the victors will have a military parade instead??

  11. And stay tuned because, right after the MLB portion of bread and circuses is completed on Fox, we get the second edition of Hunger Games. Here's my review of the written trilogy:

  12. Boston Strong!

    Sox are champs. Bump the myths.

    The last time Boston clinched the World Series at home was Sept. 11, 1918.