In the 1973 film Executive Action there's the line "The Plan is perfectly plain, two terms for JFK, two for Bobby and two for Ted."
That idea would be the culmination of Joe Kennedy Sr.'s dream. Joe Jr., the first born who was groomed to lead the Kennedy political dynasty didn't make it back from WWII so it was left to the less well prepared JFK and the younger ones. Future generations would be encouraged to continue the tradition as time went on.
But a funny thing happened on the way to Camelot. Other families, and many of them, wanted a dynasty too. It was a covert war and the Kennedy's physically lost.
The most sinister money hungry families took control and became the puppet front for the US part in the world wide crime syndicate of theft and war. The Bush's and Clinton's, et al, beat the Kennedy's. Two down dead and Ted junks his chance in drink or he is sabotaged or both. The handlers are fairly happy but there's much more they want to do.
In the fading thoughts of our mythology is that the Kennedy's would at least have had a much smaller body count, both at home and overseas.
The Kennedy last stand was John-John. In the ungodly scenario of Hillary Clinton becoming president in 2016, the assassination of John Jr. is a most significant factor.
John F. Kennedy Jr. was killed on July 16, 1999. The last Kennedy who possibly could have made a difference died in an accidental plane crash according to the official reports. Official reports seldom tell the truth but exist to cover up the crimes. The corporate media, the same then as today, whitewashes the story.
John Jr. was going to run for the New York Senate. He would have won. Hillary Clinton would have been delegated to the dust bin of history and the U.S. political scene could have been much different than it is today. Of course the argument could be made that if he had not died then, other attempts would have been made. The threat against the established order was too great. He had to die.
Essentially, the same cabal that killed his father killed him.
WRH has an account of why the official story is in doubt:
Other accounts also question JFK Jr's death:
Caroline has been so non-controversial she became the Ambassador to Japan, Robert Jr.did have a few good things to say about electronic vote fraud but he stayed within the boundaries.They got to live. The rest of the family has either self destructed or decided to stay low key and be safe.
50 years of getting rid of or keeping in line the Kennedy's has been a success. Maybe we've learned a few things from it, even if we haven't done much about it.....yet.
Just what can we do for our country? That's a question which we still struggle with. JFK gave us a little hint on where we could start on April 27, 1961
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."
"Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations."