Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Tinker Tailor Terrorist Spy


Billionaire Hollywood producer and Israeli citizen, Arnon Milchan, who has long tinkered with the American mind and apparently tailored Oliver Stone's "JFK" to divert from Israel's and the jewish role in the assassination has finally admitted that he worked as a terrorist arms dealer and spy for his 'country.'

Arnon Milchan gave a lengthy interview to the Israeli documentary programme Uvda, broadcast on Monday on Channel 2, confirming claims made earlier in an unauthorised biography that he worked for an Israeli agency which neegotiated arms deals and supported Israel's secret nuclear weapons project.

He claimed to have used connections to promote the apartheid regime in South Africa in exchange for it helping Israel acquire uranium.

Milchan, who is part-owner of Israel’s Channel 10 television company, also admitted trying to use an unnamed big star to entice a US nuclear scientist to a private meeting in the actor’s house, although the report didn’t clarify if the rendezvous ever took place.

Notice that in the US, western and Israeli main steam media reports, that while listing a number of films Milchan has produced, "JFK" is conspicuous by its absence.

Shouldn't there be an immediate indictment issued for Milchan's arrest? If he ever sets foot again in this country shouldn't he be taken into custody for high crimes? He should share a cell with Jonathan Pollard.

Of course it won't happen and we all know the reasons why. It does add to the list of why we should boycott all Hollywood films as they so often provide cover for the crimes and myths of Israel. Being a traitor to the country these propagandists work in is just business as usual.

Sunday, November 24, 2013


"Awaiting the Unknown" by Iraqi artist
Muayad Muhsin

The former "Sophia Scholar" has a new trilogy of blogs that you may find interesting.

Boy Down the Lane

Occurrences Domestic Foreign

The Sullen Bell

One of the main things at the top of my list in what I like about certain bloggers is the lack of monetary incentives, those that do what they do out of the love of communicating and trying to make a difference. A big hat tip to all of them.

Excerpt from "Boy".......
Libertarians and the Tea Party to the right of me, Socialists and progressives to the left of me, and Zionists and neo-conservatives dead ahead of me.

Don’t look now, but who’s behind me?

(Or, what’s in me?)

Virtually everyone has an opinion and insists strongly on it, and that he or she alone is correct, and that his or her perception of events, authors, etc. is accurate.  But we’re all human. We come from a specific place, with a specific upbringing and education in a specific culture, and our very humanity, our status as an upright biped with a triune brain and rampant hormones, all under the duress of modern life, the media, family matters, nutrition (or lack of it), erroneous belief structures, a failure to understand our own bodies and minds, all swimming in a tsunami of information, misinformation, and openly deceptive people and practices.

It has been said that our most significant problem and our most significant need is that we don’t know how to talk to one another. This is true among people who can be regarded to be in close contact and intimacy, let alone the additional tasks and burdens of trying to communicate virtually across miles and cultures through this thing called the Internet. So before we blindly dismiss opinions and perspectives, we ought to be sure we have a good reason for doing so.

This isn’t a Kumbaya message of “let’s all learn to get along”.

The message is that we must learn to talk to another for the sole purpose of life, of learning to succeed or thrive on our own terms without interference or control by others.


There has been some sort of agreement on Iran's nuclear program. Iran claims victory. Faux News with dual citizen traitor John Bolton also says 'a huge victory for Iran' but not in the same sense as Iran claims. My own Senator, Bob Corker, made the shill tour of the Sunday morning talking head 'shows' to express doubt and please his zionist handlers. 

Apparently Netanyahu is still in his war mood. He doesn't like the talks outcome one bit but that's to be expected. He still wants the US to fight his wars for him and help expand the Eretz Yisrael concept.

Netanyahu spews his spite...
"What was achieved last night in Geneva is not a historic agreement, it was a historic mistake," Netanyahu told his cabinet. “Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world took a significant step towards obtaining the world's most dangerous weapon.”

"Israel is not committed by this agreement.”  “The regime in Iran is committed to destroying Israel. [But] Israel has the right and obligation to defend itself from any threat, [and] will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability."
From Catherine Shakdam (excerpt):
If anything, the horrors and humiliations which Israel and its foreign agents have imposed on the Palestinian people should act as a living reminder of what the Islamic world could undergo should the Zionists have their way.
And while many experts, politicians and analysts alike, have often labeled such warnings under the conspiracy theory tag, realities on the ground and more importantly recent world developments have come to sustain such theories as universal truth.

As Benjamin Franklin so cleverly put it, “Half a truth is often a great lie.” In the case of Israel, many half-truths have come to weave the biggest deception of all.

Just as surely as a spider weaves its web, Zionists have climbed dizzyingly high on the world power ladder, bent on crushing and discarding whoever and whatever will oppose its world domination agenda and race for ultimate rule.  
Ever since the Zionists fooled a weak and exhausted post-WWII world community into buying into its so-called legitimate religious aspirations for a Jewish state on Palestinian land, Zionists have held the Islamic world hostage, having laid the cornerstone of the next battle to be had. World War III is a work in progress, if only we were to open our eyes.

Is there a break between Obama-Kerry and Israel or is this just grand theater

A senior White House official has said that Israel’s “all-or-nothing” posture demanding a total halt to Iran’s nuclear energy program is a path to war.In a conference call with think tanks and advocacy groups sympathetic to the Obama administration’s strategy with Iran, the official said Israel’s stance would “close the door on diplomacy” and would “essentially lead to war.”


In the midst of all this Iran talk we must not forget about Syria.  The mercenaries of the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia and NATO are still continuing their deadly games. Although the BBC and CNN will tell us it's both sides killing children, we have to question their integrity. Syria is of course another war for Israel and the Saudis have a vested interest but sane people all over the world know this carnage must stop. Once again, just ask "Who Benefits?"

More than 11,000 children have died in Syria's civil war, including 128 killed by chemical weapons and hundreds targeted by snipers, a British think-tank says.
The Oxford Research Group, which specialises in global security, said in a new study that there were 11,420 recorded deaths of children aged 17 years and under.

The report, entitled Stolen Futures: The Hidden Toll of Child Casualties in Syria, analyses data from the beginning of the conflict in March, 2011, until August, 2013

The think-tank said 764 children were summarily executed and 389 were killed by sniper fire in the conflict.
While the US moves towards becoming a third world country that won't even take care of its own, our tax dollars go to the murdering of children in countries that are not our enemy. Somehow, someway, we have to stop this or next it could very well be be our own children, in our own streets. 

Friday, November 22, 2013

A Nation of Lone Gunmen

From John Wilkes Booth (Lincoln), Charles Julius Guiteau (Garfield), Leon Czolgosz (McKinley), Lee Harvey Oswald (JFK), Sirhan Bishara Sirhan (RFK), James Earl Ray (MLK),  Charles Joseph Whitmam (UT Austin), and on up to the more recent, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold (Columbine). Seung-Hui Cho (VA Tech), Nidal Hasan (Ft. Hood), Jared Lee Loughner (Gabby Giffords), James Holmes (Aurora), Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook), Aaron Alexis (Washington Naval Yard) as well as a number of less well known characters, the meme of the lone nut gunman has been ingrained into the consciousness of America.

One could include those with alleged accomplices, Timothy McVeigh,  the 9/11 'hijackers,' and the 'Boston Bombers' into that general theme.

Add to that the lone 'suicide bombers' in the Middle East and elsewhere plus the very real local thugs and psychopaths who are in most every community, and what you have is a narrative of no matter where you may be, the lone gunman may be just around the corner. It creates the 'need' for security, disarming of citizens and mental evaluations of most everyone which must start in childhood.

This is no way to live. This is not the world of rational people.

Didn't the term 'lone gunman' as we now define it originate during the Warren Commission period? Now during this 50th anniversary of the great coup d'état, we have been inundated by the criminally complicit media with the repetitive meme of the lone gunman. A few token questions of conspiracy are allowed, trying for some little credibility, but not pursued. This has been a mass marketed re-affirmation of the lies of an official story. One of the most well planned and executed media psyops commemorating an 'event' ever. Mind control for the masses. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see a 'lone nut' shooting fairly soon for reinforcement.  

This social engineering doesn't work on everyone. Some just don't march to the tune and now they are portrayed as the enemy, the lone gunman, the threat. 

The psychology of conspiracy theories is a new growth industry paid for by those who actually fear the truth. It's an attempt not just to marginalize but if needed to destroy a loosely defined movement who is tired of the crimes. 

In a nation of lone gunmen, you are a suspect...if you can can think...if you question. Creating enemies, domestic and foreign, is an ongoing project but you know what? Their bullshit is fading, too many have caught on, too many are not amused by deception.

Peace to everyone who comes here.Thanks for remembering.

Hands of Tennesseans eager to grasp the hand of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John F. Kennedy, right, stretch over the roof of a car as he leaves a 150-car motorcade and heads for the speakers platform in front of the War Memorial in Nashville Sept. 21, 1960.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

JFK and His Boy

In the 1973 film Executive Action there's the line "The Plan is perfectly plain, two terms for JFK, two for Bobby and two for Ted."

That idea would be the culmination of Joe Kennedy Sr.'s dream. Joe Jr., the first born who was groomed to lead the Kennedy political dynasty didn't make it back from WWII so it was left to the less well prepared JFK and the younger ones. Future generations would be encouraged to continue the tradition as time went on.

But a funny thing happened on the way to Camelot. Other families, and many of them, wanted a dynasty too. It was a covert war and the Kennedy's physically lost.

The most sinister money hungry families took control and became the puppet front for the US part in the world wide crime syndicate of theft and war. The Bush's and Clinton's, et al, beat the Kennedy's. Two down dead and Ted junks his chance in drink or he is sabotaged or both. The handlers are fairly happy but there's much more they want to do.

In the fading thoughts of our mythology is that the Kennedy's would at least have had a much smaller body count, both at home and overseas. 

The Kennedy last stand was John-John. In the ungodly scenario of Hillary Clinton becoming president in 2016, the assassination of John Jr. is a most significant factor.

A revisit...
John F. Kennedy Jr. was killed on July 16, 1999. The last Kennedy who possibly could have made a difference died in an accidental plane crash according to the official reports. Official reports seldom tell the truth but exist to cover up the crimes. The corporate media, the same then as today, whitewashes the story.

John Jr. was going to run for the New York Senate. He would have won. Hillary Clinton would have been delegated to the dust bin of history and the U.S. political scene could have been much different than it is today. Of course the argument could be made that if he had not died then, other attempts would have been made. The threat against the established order was too great. He had to die.

Essentially, the same cabal that killed his father killed him.

WRH has an account of why the official story is in doubt:
John F. Kennedy Jr. - Evidence of a Cover Up

Other accounts also question JFK Jr's death:
Official Investigative Report - JFK Jr. Murdered!
Was JFK Jr. Murdered?

Caroline has been so non-controversial she became the Ambassador to Japan, Robert Jr.did have a few good things to say about electronic vote fraud but he stayed within the boundaries.They got to live. The rest of the family has either self destructed or decided to stay low key and be safe.

50 years of getting rid of or keeping in line the Kennedy's has been a success. Maybe we've learned a few things from it, even if we haven't done much about it.....yet.

Just what can we do for our country? That's a question which we still struggle with. JFK gave us a little hint on where we could start on April 27, 1961
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."
"Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations."

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

JFK and the Zionists

Golda Meir and John F Kennedy meeting in the US, December 1962.

Before the election in 1960, JFK was careful in his words to the Zionist lobby. I guess he felt he needed to in order to win the jewish vote and money. Aspects of his speech to the Zionists of America are disappointing and contains some of the myths of the creation of Israel but it is part of the history that is not much spoken about during this 50th anniversary.  It was politics of the day and no need to whitewash what JFK said at the time. Things changed over time and Kennedy did push to keep Israel from obtaining nuclear weapons and he continually talked about peace in the Middle East but it was too little and too late. What could have been is the big unknown.

Speech by Senator John F. Kennedy, Zionists of America Convention, Statler Hilton Hotel, New York, NY
August 26, 1960

Prophecy is a Jewish tradition, and the World Zionist movement, in which all of you have played so important a role, has continued this tradition. It has turned the dreams of its leaders into acts of statesmanship. It has converted the hopes of the Jewish people into concrete facts of life.

When the first Zionist conference met in 1897, Palestine was a neglected wasteland. A few scattered Jewish colonies had resettled there, but they had come to die in the Holy Land, rather than to make it live again in greatness. Most of the governments of the world were indifferent.

But now all is changed. Israel became a triumphant and enduring reality exactly 50 years after Theodore Herzl, the prophet of Zionism, had proclaimed the ideal of nationhood. It was the classic case of an ancient dream finding a young leader, for Herzl was then only 37 years of age. Perhaps I may be allowed the observation that the Jewish people - ever since David slew Goliath - have never considered youth as a barrier to leadership, or measured experience and maturity by mere length of days.

I first saw Palestine in 1939. There the neglect and ruin left by centuries of Ottoman misrule were slowly being transformed by miracles of labor and sacrifice. But Palestine was still a land of promise in 1939, rather than a land of fulfillment. I returned in 1951 to see the grandeur of Israel. In 3 years this new state had opened its doors to 600,000 immigrants and refugees. Even while fighting for its own survival, Israel had given new hope to the persecuted and new dignity to the pattern of Jewish life. I left with the conviction that the United Nations may have conferred on Israel the credentials of nationhood; but its own idealism and courage, its own sacrifice and generosity, had earned the credentials of immortality.

Some do not agree. Three weeks ago I said in a public statement: "Israel is here to stay." The next day I was attacked by Cairo radio, rebuking me for my faith in Israel, and quoting this criticism from the Arabic newspaper Al-Gomhouria:

As for the question of the existence and the nonexistence of Israel, Mr. Kennedy says that Israel has been created in order to exist. Time will judge between us, Mr. Kennedy. I agree. Time will judge whether Israel will continue to exist. But I wish I could be as sure of all my prophecies as I am of my flat prediction that Israel is here to stay.

For Israel was not created in order to disappear - Israel will endure and flourish. It is the child of hope and the home of the brave. It can neither be broken by adversity nor demoralized by success. It carries the shield of democracy and it honors the sword of freedom; and no area of the world has ever had an overabundance of democracy and freedom.

It is worth remembering, too, that Israel is a cause that stands beyond the ordinary changes and chances of American public life. In our pluralistic society, it has not been a Jewish cause - any more than Irish independence was solely the concern of Americans of Irish descent. The ideals of Zionism have, in the last half century, been repeatedly endorsed by Presidents and Members of Congress from both parties. Friendship for Israel is not a partisan matter. It is a national commitment.

Yet within this tradition of friendship there is a special obligation on the Democratic Party. It was President Woodrow Wilson who forecast with prophetic wisdom the creation of a Jewish homeland. It was President Franklin Roosevelt who kept alive the hopes of Jewish redemption during the Nazi terror. It was President Harry Truman who first recognized the new State of Israel and gave it status in world affairs. And may I add that it would be my hope and my pledge to continue this Democratic tradition - and to be worthy of it.

What is needed now is leadership - impartial but firm, deliberate but bold - leadership instead of rhetoric. There has been enough rhetoric in recent years about free transit through the Suez Canal - but there has been no leadership. Our policy in Washington and in the United Nations has permitted defiance of our pledge with impunity - indeed, with economic reward.

If America's word in the world community is to have meaning - if the mutual security amendment which I cosponsored with Senator Douglas is to have meaning - and if the clear, thoughtful language of the Democratic platform is to have meaning - the influence of this Nation and other maritime powers must be brought to bear on a just solution that removes all discrimination at the Suez Canal for all times. And the White House must take the lead.

We have also had much rhetoric in recent years about opposing an arms race and a solution by force in the Middle East. The rhetoric has not only been empty and negative. Even more fundamental is the premise that if the United States and the United Nations are to reject a solution based on force, then they must accept the task of finding a solution based on reason and justice.

We can no longer shun this task by pleading that the problem is too difficult. The danger is already acute from delay. Russia's position is more entrenched. The Arab States are more divided and restless. The influence of the Western nations has steadily diminished.

When I talked with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion on his most recent visit to this country, he told me of dangerous signs of unrest beneath the deceptive quiet that has fallen over the Middle East. For there is no peace in that region today - only an embittered truce between renewed alarms.

American intervention, on the other hand, will not now be easy for the record is not one to which we can point with pride:  
The humble plea by the George Allen mission to Cairo, to urge Egyptian reconsideration of their acceptance of Soviet arms;

The series of incredible American blunders which led to the Suez crisis of 1956, events in which the role of our Government has never been fully explained;

The so-called Eisenhower doctrine, now repudiated by some of the very nations which accepted our aid, and the cause even at that time of widespread antagonism from Middle Eastern leaders who felt we were cynically trying to use them for our own cold war ends;

And, in general, a deterioration in our relations with all Middle Eastern nations, primarily because neither Israel nor the Arabs knew exactly what to expect from us. At times it must have appeared to many in the area that the shortest route to Washington was through Moscow. At times it must have appeared that champions of democracy and freedom were being punished for their virtues, by being taken for granted by a neglectful administration that suddenly showed concern only when it was displeased by their conduct. 
Peace in the Middle East is not one step nearer reality today than it was 8 years ago - but Russian influence is immeasurably greater.

What can a new President do? More weakness and timidity will not do. More stubborn errors redeemed at the last moment by impulsive action - will not do.

Now we must take the risk of leadership, and use our influence to compose this ugly situation before it breaks out in a new threat to peace. And I know we will not be alone in searching for a peaceful settlement - if our aims are high, and if they are centered solely on the genuine needs of the Middle East, and on an honorable end to these ancient quarrels.

First: I propose that the new President reaffirm our sincere friendship for all the peoples of the Middle East, whatever their religion or race or politics.

Second: I propose that we make it crystal clear that the United States means what it said in the tripartite declaration of 1950 - that we will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab States our guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation. And to complete the effectiveness of this guarantee, I propose that we invite all like-minded nations to join with us in signing, registering, and depositing this declaration with the United Nations.

At present the tripartite declaration is too uncertain of execution and effect to be a useful shield for peace. With countries so close to one another in a sensitive tension-ridden area, a delay of only a few days in international reaction to aggression might well be fatal to a nation's freedom and indeed the peace of the entire world. Once the nations of the Middle East have a firm and precise guarantee, the need for continuing the arms race will disappear, the easing of tensions inevitably will follow, and both sides will be able to devote their energies and talents to peaceful pursuits.

Third: I propose that all the authority and prestige of the White House be used to call into conference the leaders of Israel and the Arab States to consider privately their common problems, assuring them that we support in full their aspirations for peace, unity, independence, and a better life - and that we are prepared to back up this moral support with economic and technical assistance.

The offer would be made with equal frankness to both sides; and all the world would be watching the response of each side. I sincerely believe that an American presidential initiative for peace, honestly intended and resolutely pursued, would not be lightly rejected by either side. And I promise to waste no time in taking this initiative.

For I have always believed that there is no real conflict or contradiction between the genuine aspirations of the Arab nations and the genuine aspirations of Israel. The Arab peoples rose to freedom and independence in the very years which saw the rise of Israel. From the cooperation of these two awakened nationalisms could come a new golden age for the Middle East. But from their destructive vendetta can come nothing but misery and poverty and the risk of war.

The Middle East needs water, not war; tractors, not tanks; bread, not bombs. There is already little enough available in the way of financial and physical resources for either side to be devoting its energies to huge defense budgets. The present state of tensions serves only the worst interests of Arab and Israeli alike. But a new spirit of comity could well serve the highest ideals of both.

For the original Zionist philosophy has always maintained that the people of Israel would use their national genius not for selfish purposes but for the enrichment and glory of the entire Middle East. The earliest leaders of the Zionist movement spoke of a Jewish state which would have no military power and which would be content with victories of the spirit.

The compulsions of a harsh and inescapable necessity have compelled Israel to abandon this hope. But I cannot believe that Israel has any real desire to remain indefinitely a garrison state surrounded by fear and hate. And I cannot believe that the Arab world would not find a better basis for unity in a united attack on all their accumulated social problems - an attack in which they could benefit immensely from a closer cooperation with the people of Israel.

The technical skills and genius of Israel have already brought their blessings to Burma and to Ethiopia. Still other nations in Asia and in Africa are eager to benefit from the special skills available in that bustling land. Why should the Middle East alone be cut off from this partnership? And why should not the people of Israel receive the blessings available to them from association with the Arab world?

When we think of the possibilities of this association, an emotion of soaring hope replaces our somber anxieties about the Middle East. Ancient rivers would give their power to new industries. The desert would yield to civilization. Disease would be eradicated, especially the disease that strikes down helpless children. The blight of poverty would be replaced by the blessings of abundance.

But it is a long and painful step from the era of the boycott to the era of partnership - and that step needs the direct encouragement and help of the White House. The next President of the United States should always be personally available to stimulate every experiment in cooperation, from the joint development of a river, to a reconsideration of the Arab refugee problem, to the crowning mercy of the final reconciliation that can be brought only by a true peace settlement.

Peace is our primary objective in the Middle East - and peace is partly our responsibility. "Seek peace, and pursue it" commands the psalmist. And that we must do. With open minds, open hearts, and the priceless asset of our American heritage, we shall seek peace in the Middle East, as elsewhere. And when history writes its verdict, let it be said that we pursued the peace with all the courage, all the strength, and all the resourcefulness at our command.

In this task, I ask for your assistance, your patience, your wisdom, and your support - until we can say to Jew and Arab alike "Peace be within thy walls and plenteousness within thy palaces. For my brethren and companions' sake, I will wish thee prosperity."\
Citation: John F. Kennedy: "Speech by Senator John F. Kennedy, Zionists of America Convention, Statler Hilton Hotel, New York, NY," August 26, 1960. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=74217.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Diversion of the Day - Dave McGowan's New Laurel Canyon Book Coming Soon

Finally Dave's "Inside the LC" series is coming to book form. Since Dave has disabled many of the chapters at his site (aren't you glad you saved them all as PDFs) I guess that means he's giving us a little push to buy Weird Scenes with its new additions.

Unfortunately it won't be available for Christmas. It's due to be released April 30, 2014 (Walpurgis Night), from Headpress.

Whether you agree or disagree with McGowan on his conclusions, questions and speculations, all of his writings, to me at least, are entertaining when you need a little diversion.

Excerpt from a sample chapter at Dave's facebook.....
Gram Parsons & Emmylou Harris
Working once again with Emmylou, Gram began working on tracks for what would be his posthumously-released second solo album, Grievous Angel. But as July of 1973 rolled around, a series of tragedies befell Parsons and the people around him. In July of the previous year, Gram’s friend Brandon DeWilde – who had introduced Gram to Peter Fonda, Dennis Hopper, Bruce Dern and Jack Nicholson, resulting in Gram’s involvement in The Trip – had been killed in a traffic accident. A year later, on July 15, 1973, Gram’s friend and fellow musician, Clarence White, was hit by a car and killed. According to Fong-Torres, “Around the same time that Clarence White was killed, Sid Kaiser, a familiar face in the Los Angeles rock scene, a close friend of Gram’s and, not so incidentally, a source of high-quality drugs, died of a heart attack.” Just after those two deaths, “In late July 1973 … [Gram’s] house in Laurel Canyon burned down.”

Other sources, for the record, have placed that house in Topanga Canyon rather than Laurel Canyon. Whatever the case, Gram was home when the house caught fire and he was briefly hospitalized for smoke inhalation. Having lost their home and all their possessions, Gram and Gretchen “moved into Gretchen’s father’s spacious home on Mulholland Drive in Laurel Canyon.” Gram wouldn’t live in the Burrell estate long though; on September 19, 1973, Ingram Cecil Connor III died in a nondescript room at the Joshua Tree Inn. His death is usually attributed to a drug overdose, but toxicology reports suggest otherwise. Parsons’ death received minimal press coverage, partly because, as fate would have it, singer/songwriter Jim Croce went down in a blaze of glory the very next day, on September 20, 1973. But though the media had moved on, the Gram Parsons story wasn’t quite over yet.

Parsons had been a regular visitor to Joshua Tree National Park, where one of his favorite pastimes was said to be ingesting hallucinogenic drugs and then searching for UFOs. Sometimes he would take friends like Keith Richards of the Rolling Stones along with him to help with the search. In September of 1973, Gram was accompanied to Joshua Tree by his personal assistant, Michael Martin, Martin’s girlfriend, Dale McElroy, and Parson’s former high school sweetheart, Margaret Fisher. As the story goes, the group soon ran out of pot and quickly dispatched Martin back to LA to pick up a fresh supply. He was, therefore, officially not there at the time of Gram’s death, though why he hadn’t returned has never been explained, especially given that his job was, specifically, to keep an eye on Gram and monitor his drug intake.

How Gram Parsons died is anyone’s guess. There are as many versions of the event as there were witnesses to it. Actually, that’s not quite true – there are more versions than there were witnesses, because some of those witnesses have told more than one story. Officially, Parsons died of an overdose, but forensic testing revealed no morphine or barbiturates in his blood. Morphine showed up in his liver and urine, but as experts have noted, those toxicology results indicate chronic, but not recent, use. Police seem to have had little interest in getting at the truth and made no apparent effort to reconcile the various conflicting accounts. Details of the incident – such as how long Gram had been left alone, whether he was still alive when discovered, who made that discovery, etc. – were wildly inconsistent in the accounts of Fisher, McElroy, and Frank and Alan Barbary, who were the Inn’s owner and his son. Their accounts conflicted both with each other and with the girls’ accounts.

At the hospital, police spoke briefly with the two girls and then released them. Within two hours, Phil Kaufman was on the scene to pick up Fisher and McElroy. Bypassing the police and the hospital, Kaufman went directly to the Inn, which the girls had returned to, and quickly hustled them straight back to LA. Police never spoke to either of the women again, despite the conflicting accounts and the open question of what exactly it was that killed Gram.

On the autumnal equinox of 1973, Kaufman and Martin, driving a dilapidated hearse provided by McElroy, arrived at LAX to claim the body of Gram Parsons. If this story is to be believed, then nobody, including the police officer who was nearby, found it at all unusual that two drunken, disheveled men in an obviously out-of-service hearse (it had no license plates and several broken windows) had arrived without any paperwork to claim the body of a deceased celebrity. In fact, according to Kaufman’s dubious account, the cop even helped the pair load the casket into the hearse – and then looked the other way when Martin slammed the hearse into a wall on the way out of the hangar.

Kaufman and Martin then drove the body back out to Joshua Tree, doused it with gasoline and set it ablaze. Local police initially speculated that the cremation was “ritualistic,” which indeed it was, but such reports were, and continue to be, scoffed at.

On September 26, LAPD detectives, led by anchorman Larry Burrell, came knocking on Kaufman’s door with warrants to serve. Bizarrely enough, director Arthur Penn was there with a full crew shooting scenes for the film Night Moves with star Gene Hackman. When you are a friend of Charlie Manson’s, it would appear, everyone in Hollywood wants to hang out with you. While the crew continued working, Kaufman was taken in but he was back just a few hours later. In the end, he and Martin were fined $300 each plus reimbursement for the cost of the coffin.

In January 1974, four months after Parson’s death, Grievous Angel was released to critical acclaim and public indifference. Later that year, Gram’s adoptive father, Bob Parsons, died from complications of an alcohol-related illness. He had apparently been making moves aimed at gaining control of the deceased musician’s estate. By sheer coincidence, no doubt, the deaths of Gram and Bob Parsons were followed by the 1974 bankruptcy of much of the Snively family business. Around that same time, Little Avis gave birth to daughter Flora. Sixteen years later, both were killed in a boating accident in Virginia. Avis had made it all the way to age forty.

You might also want to take a look at McGowan's "The Boston Marathon Bombings: Fully Exposed."

Sunday, November 17, 2013

The JFK Assassination Still Matters

The mainstream totally controlled media is making an all out attack on the sensibilities of the American people during this 50th anniversary of the assassination. I have the feeling that they want this to be the end of the discussion, the climax and then the letdown.

There's not much need in playing the 'what if?' game even if that's what has been on our minds for so long. We can't know if the steamroller would have crushed onward anyway and which 'events' of the last five decades would have or have not happened had JFK lived. History matters lest we repeat the same things over and over again as we so often have. But keeping the history in the back of our minds is useful only if it leads to solutions in our current situation. Our crisis is now and that's the way it has always been. There's no time like the present if we are to find a way to an honest and just future.

I found this short article to very well sum it up... Why Does It Still Matter?
There is no doubt now that there was a conspiracy, yet most of us are not very angry about it. The conspiracy to kill the president of the United States was also a conspiracy against the democratic system --and thus a conspiracy against you. I think you should get very angry about that." - Gaeton Fonzi, Investigator HSCA

It matters because the murder of President Kennedy was not only a conspiracy but a true Coup d' Etat. The powers behind it, did not only come away with it, but took control over the new government and orchestrated the cover-up. These powers included some of the highest elected officials like president Lyndon Johnson and later presidents, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, former CIA director Allen Dulles, John McCloy and Arlen Specter.

It matters because a coup d'etat that was successfully kept secret in a democratic country means, by default, that the succeeding government was illegitimate.

It matters because the American government continues to LIE about the Kennedy assassination. The vast majority of the American people does not believe the official version because of a preponderance of evidence to the contrary, evidence that was uncovered not by the government but by private concerned citizens. The majority of the American people KNOWS their government is still lying. How can Americans honestly export their democratic values and principles with the knowledge that their government is lying?

It matters because if the government is still lying about the Kennedy assassination, it essentially means that the powers that killed John F. Kennedy are still in charge this very day. Therefore the Kennedy assassination is NOT just an historical event of a distant past. It is an event that has changed the course of history and has set the stage for the political situation of today. In short, it has affected all our lives to some extent, but we do not know exactly how or why.

It matters because the mainstream media continues to support, and even endorse, the official version of the Kennedy assassination. We must, therefore, seriously question if there is indeed freedom of speech and freedom of press in America.

It matters because the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald, his denial of a fair legal representation and trial, and the systematic distortion of his legacy, is one of the great injustices in American history, not only to him, but for his family and the American people as a whole.

It matters because John F. Kennedy was not the only one that was killed. The path to the truth is littered with dead bodies of mostly innocent and patriotic people killed just because they knew something, just because they had seen something, or because they tried to expose a level of corruption that, at the time, was unequaled in American history. And some of these cases are in a much less distant past than the death of John F. Kennedy.

If the citizens of a democratic society are not able to uncover the truth about the assassination of their own elected president, they effectively have no control over their destiny. They may want, and indeed need, to believe differently but that does not make it less of a lie. In short: Wake up, get angry and take your country back!

We can scream "Wake Up" to the wind and to the world until our voices are raw but without solutions, no matter how small, our lives will pass on without resolving the problems we not only inherited but also have allowed to continue. Unresolved, that's a helluva legacy for those we leave behind and they won't be too happy about it. Small unwavering steps towards truth may be all we can do.

Here's one thought. Perhaps some of you have others?

Thursday, November 14, 2013

JFK, Oswald, Ruby, the CIA and the Mossad

The JFK assassination and subsequent cover-up is filled with speculation but connecting the dots some say leads to Israeli involvement. They were not the only ones involved but could they have played an intricate part? You bet they could. They helped develop the modern science of assassination in the late 1940's and it continues to today.

Of course the CIA with George H.W. Bush and others were also involved.

So far the preeminent research on Israeli involvement is Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgement.
This may be the most unusual cover of any book—and there have been many—published about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. But then, again, Final Judgment—like its cover—is extraordinary. The figures shown (left to right) are Meyer Lansky, the head of the global organized crime syndicate, David Ben-Gurion, the Israeli Prime Minister who resigned his post in 1963, disgusted with President John Kennedy's refusal to support Israel's drive to build a nuclear arsenal, and James J. Angleton who—in 1963—was the CIA's director of counterintelligence and head of the CIA's liaison desk for Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad. Over Angleton's shoulder is the logo of the Central Intelligence Agency. In the background, of course, is a nuclear explosion. Israel achieved its nuclear weapons capabilities precisely because of the assassination of President Kennedy. And so did Red China. All of the frightening details appear in the pages of Final Judgment.

For ten years Israeli propagandists called Final Judgment author Michael Collins Piper a "liar" and an "anti-Semite" for charging that Israeli intelligence played a role in the JFK assassination conspiracy because of JFK's bitter secret conflict with Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion over Israel's efforts to build nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Certain self-styled “JFK assassination researchers" scoffed at Piper and refused to address the thesis of his book.

However, on July 25, 2004, many of Piper's critics were red-faced and silent when Israel's respected Jerusalem Post carried a story headlined: "Vanunu: Israel behind JFK Assassination." The newspaper reported that famed Jewish-born nuclear physicist, Dr. Mordechai Vanunu, recently released after spending 18 years in prison for exposing Israel's covert atomic weapons program—had charged that supporters of Israel's drive for nuclear weapons were involved in the JFK assassination precisely because of JFK's interference with their ambitions.

The Israeli government dismissed Vanunu's allegations, but what he said received attention in newspapers worldwide, with the notable exception of the United States where one and only one newspaper, mentioned Vanunu's charges and that was American Free Press, the Washington-based weekly that published Final Judgment. {more at WikiSpooks}

Former Illinois Congressman Paul Findley March 1992
In Kennedy Assassination, Anyone But Mossad is Fair Game for U.S. Media
It is interesting-but not surprising-to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned.

And yet a Mossad motive is obvious. Israeli leaders never trusted the Kennedys. They were aware that when President Kennedy's father, Joseph Kennedy, was ambassador to Great Britain, he frequently praised Nazi Germany.

During John Kennedy's campaign for the presidency, a group of New York Jews had privately offered to meet his campaign expenses if he would let them set his Middle East policy. He did not agree.

The Journal of History
All other Kennedys who even thought about running for President had to be eliminated, because they would find out the truth about Israel when in the presidency, and in control of the CIA. The elimination of Ted Kennedy, by an arranged accident, and the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and John Kennedy Jr. were a necessity for Israel to keep the lid on the JFK assassination by the Mossad and their operatives.

Lee Harvey Oswald was setup to be the "patsy" by his connections to Clay Shaw and Permindex which was a Mossad front organization and also by CIA agent E. Howard Hunt who wanted a "fake" assassination attempt to implicate Cuba. The real assassins were French Corsicans set up by Yitzhak Shamir a Mossad assassin himself. The fatal shots were fired from the Grassy Knoll. Oswald was arrested and charged with 2 murders. Enter Jack Ruby to seal the plot.

The 1st attempt to kill Oswald. Jack Ruby was tied into the Jewish mob by dealings with Meyer Lansky, the "King of Crime." It was intended that Lee Harvey Oswald would die in the assassination plot. According to the Warren Report Mark Lane testimony, a meeting took place between Ruby, Officer Tippit, and a "phoney carpet salesman" possible Mossad-agent Bernie Weissman* at Ruby's Carousel Club on the 14th, eight days before the JFK assassination. It is likely plans were made for the execution of Oswald by Officer Tippit at the pre-arranged meeting site known ahead of time. Oswald by then, may have realized he was being set up as the patsy and shot Officer Tippit instead at 1:15 PM, 45 minutes after the assassination of JFK. (Oswald was seen running away). However, other reports indicate that Ruby was on the scene also intending to shoot Oswald but instead shot Officer Tippet. Descriptions of the "other man" favored Ruby. The weapon used was an automatic, not Oswald's gun. When Oswald unexpectedly survived, and was captured and arrested, he had to be killed by the Jewish mob to keep the real truth-of-the-matter from interrogators and the U.S. public. (*Weissman arrived Nov 4th in Dallas and departed on the 27th. He denied the meeting allegation, but his strange testimony could only be believed with a stretch of the political imagination. We think he was lying.-ed. )

Below are some of the strange statements made by Jack Ruby.

The day before the JFK assassination, November 21st at noontime in Assistant District Attorney Ben Ellis' office in front of 6 others, Ruby introduced himself to Ben Ellis and told Mr. Ellis, "You probably don't know me now, but you will." ( quoting report to Chief Curry from Lt W.F. Dyson - Dallas archives )

Ruby paid off a colored employee and said: "You had better get it all tonight, because I won't be around." Ruby then went to the Police station on Friday night, the 22nd, posed as a writer or interpreter for Jewish newspaper people, and on the 3rd floor of the police department tried to kill Oswald but could not get the opportunity.(Verified by HUDKINS, reporter of the Houston Post.) The wife of Yitzhak Rabin, Leah Rabin, revealed in a biography, that Rabin was in Dallas when Kennedy was assassinated. There is little doubt that Ruby was connected to Rabin and Israel during those moments he was seeking to kill Oswald. "Yes, Rabin could have been one of the "journalists," writes Jewish author BARRY CHAMISH.

According to the Houston Post, and/or Houston Chronicle, after Ruby had finally seized the opportunity to kill Oswald at 11:21 AM on Sunday morning, the 24th, shortly after, he blurted out that he and others were going to be "the cause of the death of 25 million Jews," meaning ...if the investigators could figure it out.

Ruby's phoney story: he was "relieving Jackie Kennedy to have to come to Dallas to testify." But later he said: "the world will never know - nor would they believe - what took place here" and "take me to Washington DC and I will tell you all that I know. I cannot say anything here, I am the only one left that can tell you everything." Then Ruby conveniently died of "Lung Cancer". - Maybe.

Ruby was noted for blurting out Incrimnating Statements. Many believed that he could not hold a secret or be trusted. Ruby was convinced that all the Jews of the world would be slaughtered. ( Yes, he had already tipped his mit about the Jews - ed.)

"When they brought in the death penalty, he cracked. Ten days later he rammed his head into a cell wall. Then he tried to kill himself with an electric light socket. Then he tried to hang himself with sheets." (Then they just helped him do it with "lung cancer", at age 55. Ruby told his family that he was injected with cancer cells. He had to go, just like Oswald, to conceal the truth. -ed.).

Did Ruby meet Oswald at 2:15 AM Friday, in the early morning hours before the JFK assassination? Read the testimony of Mary Lawrence, waitress at the B&B Cafe in Mesquite, Texas, just east of Dallas.

The Strange Case of Marine Oswald Porter. Was she a Mossad mole?

Dorothy Kilgallen and Jack Jacob Ruby Rubenstein
Whatever information Kilgallen learned and from whatever source, many researchers believe it brought about her strange death. She told attorney Mark Lane: "They've killed the President, [and] the government is not prepared to tell us the truth . . . " and that she planned to "break the case." To other friends she said: "This has to be a conspiracy! . . . I'm going to break the real story and have the biggest scoop of the century." And in her last column item regarding the assassination, published on September 3, 1965, Kilgallen wrote: "This story isn't going to die as long as there's a real reporter alive - and there are a lot of them."

But on November 8, 1965, there was one less reporter. That day Dorothy Kilgallen was found dead in her home. It was initially reported that she died of a heart attack, but quickly this was changed to an overdose of alcohol and pills. (Crossfire, p. 425)
Kilgallen's reporting brought her into contact with Mark Lane who had himself received an amazing story from the journalist Thayer Waldo. He had discovered that Jack Ruby, J. D. Tippet and Bernard Weismann had a meeting at the Carousel Club eight days before the assassination. Waldo, who worked for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, was too scared to publish the story. He had other information about the assassination. However, he believed that if he told Lane or Kilgallen he would be killed. Kilgallen's article on the Tippit, Ruby and Weissman meeting appeared on the front page of the Journal American. Later she was to reveal that the Warren Commission were also tipped off about this gathering. However, their informant added that there was a fourth man at the meeting, an important figure in the Texas oil industry.

 Kilgallen published several articles about how important witnesses had been threatened by the Dallas Police or the FBI. On 25th September, 1964, Kilgallen published an interview with Acquilla Clemons, one of the witnesses to the shooting of J. D. Tippet. In the interview Clemons told Kilgallen that she saw two men running from the scene, neither of whom fitted Oswald's description. Clemons added: "I'm not supposed to be talking to anybody, might get killed on the way to work."

Kilgallen was keen to interview Jack Ruby. She went to see Ruby's lawyer Joe Tonahill and claimed she had a message for his client from a mutual friend. It was only after this message was delivered that Ruby agreed to be interviewed by Kilgallen. Tonahill remembers that the mutual friend was from San Francisco and that he was involved in the music industry. Kennedy researcher, Greg Parker, has suggested that the man was Mike Shore, co-founder of Reprise Records.

The interview with Ruby lasted eight minutes. No one else was there. Even the guards agreed to wait outside. Officially, Kilgallen never told anyone about what Ruby said to her during this interview. Nor did she publish any information she obtained from the interview. There is a reason for this. Kilgallen was in financial difficulties in 1964. This was partly due to some poor business decisions made by her husband, Richard Kollmar. The couple had also lost the lucrative contract for their radio show Breakfast with Dorothy and Dick.. Kilgallen also was facing an expensive libel case concerning an article she wrote about Elaine Shepard. Her financial situation was so bad she fully expected to lose her beloved house in New York City.

Kilgallen was a staff member of Journal American. Any article about the Jack Ruby interview in her newspaper would not have helped her serious financial situation. Therefore she decided to include what she knew about the assassination of John F. Kennedy in Murder One. She fully expected that this book would earn her a fortune. This is why she refused to tell anyone, including Mark Lane, about what Ruby told her in the interview arranged by Tonahill. In October, 1965, told Lane that she had a new important informant in New Orleans.

Kilgallen began to tell friends that she was close to discovering who assassinated Kennedy. According to David Welsh of Ramparts Magazine Kilgallen "vowed she would 'crack this case.' And another New York show biz friend said Dorothy told him in the last days of her life: "In five more days I'm going to bust this case wide open." Aware of what had happened to Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe, Kilgallen handed a draft copy of her chapter on the assassination to her friend, Florence Smith.

On 8th November, 1965, Kilgallen, was found dead in her New York apartment. She was fully dressed and sitting upright in her bed. The police reported that she had died from taking a cocktail of alcohol and barbiturates. The notes for the chapter she was writing on the case had disappeared. Her friend, Florence Smith, died two days later. The copy of Kilgallen's article were never found. 
Did Jack Jacob Ruby Rubenstein inform Dorothy Kilgallen that he had orders to kill Lee Harvey Oswald from Mayer Lansky the Israeli Mossad Jewish Mafia gangster?

Mae Brussell via Paul Krassner
"After Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald, I found it very interesting that one of the first things Ruby said was: 'I wanted to show them that a Jew had guts.'"

Ruby and Mayer Lansky
Lansky in Israel 1971
Few hours after the assassination, the official version of the event is broadcast, asserting that Lee Harvey Oswald alone killed John Kennedy. Oswald strenuously denies these charges. Oswald says to Capt. Will Fritz on Nov. 24, 1963 at 11:15 A.M., 'I did not kill President Kennedy or officer Tippit'

Then several minutes later (11:21 A.M.) Oswald is assassinated by Jacob Rubenstein an Orthodox member of the Jewish faith, who dies of cancer 37 months later in a Dallas jail. Jack Ruby (born Jacob Rubenstein) maintains that he had murdered Oswald. Ruby says 'out of patriotism to avenge President Kennedy and to spare his widow, Jacqueline Kennedy, the ordeal of appearing at Oswald's court trial.'

Later Ruby says to his defense lawyer William M. Kunstler that he killed Oswald "for the Jews." On each of the occasions Kunstler talked to him, Jack Ruby repeated that 'I did this that they wouldn't implicate Jews.' (See: Kunstler, My Life as a Radical Lawyer, 1994, p. 158 and during Kunstler's last visit Ruby handed him a note in which he reiterated that his motive was to 'Protect American Jews from a pogrom that could occur because of anger over the assassination.' Jack Ruby had a long-standing relationship with the major crime syndicates. On his prison death bed, when a friend asked him to tell the truth before he dies, Ruby said: 'Listen, you know me well, and you know that I am a reasonable businessman. I wouldn't have done it if I did not have to.'

Who, then, made Jack Ruby to kill Lee Harvey Oswald? The most likely suspect is Meyer Lansky.

The Lansky Syndicate
Meyer Lansky - Chief executive officer and de facto "treasurer" of the international crime syndicate; active in gun-running on behalf of the Israeli underground; collaborated closely with American intelligence on a number of fronts; later settled in Israel. Researchers who have claimed that "the Mafia Killed JFK" have pointedly refused to acknowledge Lansky's preeminent positioning in the underworld.

Jack Ruby - A long-time functionary for the Lansky syndicate, Ruby was the Lansky connection man in Dallas and also engaged in CIA-linked gunrunning to the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. Evidence suggests there is more to Ruby's sudden "death" than meets the eye.

All of Dallas, with back-up all over the country, was infested with Zionist moles and Sayanim agents, acting as agents of the assassination, back-up moles, and cover-up artists to create the necessary elements to force this fraud through.

Zionist Mole Zapruder and the Mossad Connection to JFK Assassination
His whole purpose was to give substance to the official, in fact, Israeli version of the shooting and to cause dispute against any alternative view.

Did Mossad Film Conclude Oswald Was Innocent? Downtown 6/10/92 {diversion}
The Israeli government's intelligence agency--The Mossad--apparently produced "a movie called A President On The Crosshairs, a detailed study of the November 22, 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy," which it screened during its training course for newly hired Mossad agents, according to former Mossad Case Officer Victor Ostrovsky's book, By Way of Deception. Ostrovsky worked for the Israeli intelligence agency for four years before concluding that it was engaged in immoral activities, resigning and moving to Canada. According to By Way Of Deception:
"The Mossad believed that the official version of the assassination was pure, unadulterated hokum. To test their theory, they did a simulation exercise of the presidential cavalcade to see if expert marksmen with far better equipment than Oswald could hit a moving target from the recorded distance of 88 years. They couldn't...

"The Mossad had every film taken of the Dallas assassination, pictures of the area, the topography, aerial photographs, everything. Using mannequins, they duplicated the presidential cavalcade over and over again...

"It was just an exercise. But it showed that it was impossible to do what Oswald was supposed to have done...The official versiion just isn't believable..."

It's not too likely, however, that the U.S. Establishment's CBS, NBC, ABC, Murdoch-Fox Television, CNN or PBS plans to televise The Mossad's A President On The Crosshairs movie for an audience of U.S. citizens on the 50th anniversary of the JFK Assassination, since the film's conclusion conflicts with the Warren Commission's conclusion.

JFK Murder Propagandists at Work - DC Dave
There’s also serious reason to be concerned about the purpose behind Oliver Stone's JFK because its executive producer was Israeli arms merchant and intelligence operative Arnon Milchan. One might readily jump to the conclusion from that fact that the movie’s purpose is to steer people away from the evidence suggesting an Israeli connection to the assassination such as is argued by Michael Collins Piper in Final Judgment, Craig Newman in The Assassination of JFK – Who Really Did It and Why and Salvador Astucia in Opium Lords: Israel, the Golden Triangle, and the Kennedy Assassination.

De-Classified Document Admits Lee Harvey Oswald Was CIA

Who Killed JFK by Dean Henderson

Did George H.W. Bush Coordinate a JFK Hit Team?
George H.W. Bush was working for the CIA at least as early as 1961; more than likely he was recruited in his college days, at Yale, when he was in the Skull and Bones Society. He and his wife Barbara moved to Houston where he ran an offshore oil drilling business, Zapata Offshore Co., which was a CIA front company with rigs located all over the world, making it very convenient for him to vanish for weeks at a time on CIA business where one would suspect what he was doing. 
Poppy was friends with Lee Harvey Oswald's friend, George De Mohrenschildt.

Meet Oswald’s CIA Handler, Mr. B

 The Making of a Patsy

The JFK Murder Is A Continuing Operation

Jim Garrison said that there were witnesses who saw Oswald and Ruby together.
Clay Shaw was CIA.
Gerald Ford just had a supercarrier named after him. The most expensive warship ever built.


Tuesday, November 12, 2013


JFK and Mary Pinchot Meyer

Did John Kennedy use LSD during his short time in the White House? Was his source for the acid his lover and confidant Mary Pinchot Meyer who was a protege of Timothy Leary?

Could his hallucinogenic experiences have triggered a paradigm shift in his thinking where he moved towards ending the Cold War, bringing all military back from Vietnam and working towards world peace and equality, which would have solidified his legacy?

Can LSD actually be that transforming? Make one realize that problems can't be solved on the same level they exist and our thinking must move to another higher level? Remember that JFK was not really known as a passivist during his WWII 'adventures' and political career. 

Keep in mind that during this period, LSD was legal. It was most likely Sandoz pure. The set and setting of the White House would have been exciting. I bet a good dose may have totally alleviated the back pain that John suffered from.

If there's any truth in that it certainly would make a lot of people mad; bankers, the CIA, Pentagon, war contractors and pick pocket politician to name a few.With plenty of money and insider help, the killing of the President had to happen to maintain the golden road of hot and cold wars and several other crime syndicate endeavors. Lyndon Johnson was waiting in the wings to fulfill the evil dream.

It's possible that JFK could have undergone a transformation in part because of LSD. It may just be a good story but we can look at some of the facts and speculations.

So who was Mary Pinchot Meyer?

From Belle News
A book claims that socialite Mary Pinchot Meyer, a beautiful divorcee who was close friends with the Kennedys and is widely known for having a lengthy affair with the playboy President, was shot in a cover-up operation by the CIA.
Mary’s Mosaic: The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy. Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Their Vision of World Peace by Peter Janney alleges that, in her preoccupation with her lover’s assassination and ensuing personal investigation, Mary Pinchot Meyer may have gotten so close to the “truth” that the CIA found her to be a threat.

As a result, CIA operatives staged a shooting to make it look like Mary Pinchot Meyer died due to a sexual assault that turned violent.

Whether or not the theory is true, there are a number of questionable components to the story of the months leading up to Mary Pinchot Meyer’s death on October 12, 1964.
Her ex-husband, Cord Meyer, was a CIA agent himself and the couple were card-carrying members of Georgetown’s starry social set, which included then-Senator John F. Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline.
The couples became close friends, along with Mary Pinchot Meyer’s sister Antoinette (who went by Tony) and her husband Ben Bradlee, who was a bureau chief for Newsweek but later went on to be the managing editor of The Washington Post.
Another couple that they spent time with was Mary Pinchot Meyer’s Vassar classmate Cicely d’Autremont and her husband James Angleton, who was the chief of the counter surveillance for the CIA.
In the book, the author claims that Mary Pinchot Meyer would often bring marijuana and LSD to her trysts with the President.
During their conversations while on these hallucinogens, Mary Pinchot Meyer reportedly tried to appeal to JFK’s pacifist nature and urged him to seek peaceful solutions to such worldwide crises like the Cold War and the Cuban missile crisis.
At the time, LSD was not illegal, and many, including Harvard professor Timothy Leary, advocated its use because they believed it helped people expand their knowledge base.
Peter Janney’s book is not the first to draw conclusions between Mary Pinchot Meyer’s friendship with Timothy Leary and her intentions with her relationship with JFK.
He goes on to say that Mary Pinchot Meyer was later murdered by the CIA, who he believes organized JFK’s assassination in an effort to stop him from preventing violent escalation that they wanted in the Cold War.
One question lies in the existence- and retrieval- of Mary Pinchot Meyer’s diary that included writings about her affair with JFK.
Within a day of her murder, Ben Bradlee went over to her home to find the diary and, though the door was locked, he found James Angleton.
The CIA spymaster said that he also was looking for the diary but claimed that it was because his wife – Mary Pinchot Meyer’s friend – had asked him to.
The whereabouts of the diary today are uncertain.  more

From Peter Janney's Mary's Mosaic...
In 1975, Senator Richard Schweiker of Pennsylvania, half of a two-man subcommittee within the Senate Church Committee, authorized to investigate the Kennedy assassination, had reviewed yet unseen classified documents at the National Archives and came to this conclusion: “We don’t know what happened [in Dallas], but we do know Oswald had intelligence connections. Everywhere you look with him, there are the fingerprints of intelligence.” In 2007, referring to Oswald’s 1959 phony “defection” to Russia, Schweiker told author David Talbot that the ex- Marine Oswald “was the product of a fake defector program run by the CIA.” Schweiker was never convinced the CIA at any time came clean with what it knew. “I certainly don’t believe the CIA gave us the whole story,” said the former Senator. 
A ‘shadow government,’ what Cold War intelligence historian L. Fletcher Prouty once called “The Secret Team,” (and what Winston Churchill once referred to as the “High Cabal” that ruled the United States), has eviscerated America’s fledgling experiment in democracy. “On top of this,” wrote Prouty in 1992, “we have now begun to realize that one of the greatest causalities of the Cold War has been the truth. At no time in the history of mankind has the general public been so misled and so betrayed as it has been by the work of the propaganda merchants of this century and their ‘historians.’”  more

"The Murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer" written by Timothy Leary. The article, which was taken from Leary's autobiography, Flashbacks, appeared in the premier issue of Larry Flynt's "The Rebel" magazine. Narrated by Clifton Shack


From Flashback 1964: Murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer
Immediately after Kennedy's assassination, Meyer telephoned famed LSD guru Timothy Leary, with whom she had consulted regarding the use of LSD, not only for herself but also for unidentified important men in Washington to whom she wanted to expose the drug. Highly emotional, she exclaimed to Leary, "They couldn't control him anymore. He was changing too fast. They've covered everything up. I gotta come see you. I'm afraid. Be careful."

After the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy began moving America in a dramatically different direction; he intended to end the Cold War through personal negotiations with Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev, who desired to do the same thing. The idea was that the United States and the Soviet Union would peacefully coexist, much as communist China and the United States do today. Kennedy's dramatic shift was exemplified by his "Peace Speech" at American University, a speech that Soviet officials permitted to be broadcast all across the Soviet Union.
That was followed by the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which in turn was followed by an executive order signed by Kennedy that began the withdrawal of troops from Vietnam. (JFK also issued an executive order requiring the Treasury to print and circulate currency backed by silver. (silver certificates).
Honest Money!!!! This was a direct attack on the money power as represented by the Federal Reserve System.)
Perhaps most significant, however, were Kennedy's secret personal communications with Khrushchev and Kennedy's secret personal outreach to Cuban president Fidel Castro, with the aim of ending the Cold War and normalizing relations with Cuba. Those personal communications were kept secret from the American people, but, more significantly, Kennedy also tried to keep them secret from the U.S. military and the CIA.
Why would the president do that?
Because by that time, Kennedy had lost confidence in both the Pentagon and the CIA. He didn't trust them, and he had no confidence in their counsel or judgment. He believed that they would do whatever was necessary to obstruct his attempts to end the Cold War and normalize relations with Cuba - which of course could have spelled the end of the U.S. national-security state, including both the enormous military-industrial complex and the CIA. Don't forget, after all, that after the disaster at the Bay of Pigs and after Kennedy had fired CIA director Alan Dulles and two other high CIA officials, he had also promised to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds."  more

MONDO 2000 Issue #6

C.S. Lewis, Aldous Huxley and JFK all died the same day